“It was a bright cold twenty-four hours in April. and the redstem storksbills were striking 13. Winston Smith. his mentum nuzzled into his chest in an attempt to get away the vile air current. slipped rapidly through the glass doors of Victory Mansions. though non rapidly plenty to forestall a whirl of farinaceous dust from come ining along with him” . In such a manner “1984” by George Orwell starts. From the really first lines the writer tires to put necessary ambiance. Actually. the chief point of the book is Orwell’s thought of personal freedom and how this freedom is defined throughout the book.

The writer presents the being of doublethink. ultimate power in society and authorities along with absence of free idea and autonomy. It is necessary to acknowledge that the book is celebrated author’s ability to make tenseness and for happening original manner of showing thoughts and ideas. The book is one of the most celebrated dystopias because it illustrates existent life. existent life conditions and chances. George Orwell provides descriptions of future paying particular attending to human face. human predestination and human destiny combat every individual from pessimistic misanthropists to the idealistic optimists.

Orwell tells a narrative of a lone Winston Smith who works in the Ministry of Truth. The chief thought is that everything is working under the force per unit area of totalitarian universe. Smith is a member of a taking party of the province. whereas Orwell underscores that merely one portion exists. In such a manner Orwell shows that the lone party provides counsel and control of all facets of human life including even the most intimate ideas. Smith’s occupation speaks for itself –Winston is assigned to supply alterations to past records to do them fit party wants.

Social civilization is treated as “doublethink” significance that presence of two conflicting facts opposes party’s political orientation. Every citizen should back up general party doctrine enabling English Socialism to subsume the kernel of different thought and to supply full control. Winston Smith thinks about autonomy and freedom of though. though he realizes that he is merely a middle-aged adult male holding no ties. His head is full of unsafe ideas and inside he is willing to fight in order to accommodate events taking topographic point around him.

Actually. he remains the merely unsettled individual being interested in human rights and personal self-respect. He thinks people should contend for what he feels proper and right. Te construct of doublethink must be eliminated. though Winston is personally weak to be able to arise. It is necessary to observe that it is the writer who wants to talk to readers via his chief character. Winston is seeking to warn people of what may come in close hereafter: “For whom. it all of a sudden occurred to him to inquire. was he composing this narrative? For the hereafter. for the unborn.

His head hovered for a minute round the dubious day of the month on the page. and so fetched up with a bump against the Newspeak word doublethink… . either the hereafter would resemble the present. in which instance it would non listen to him: or it would be different from it. and his quandary would be meaningless? ” When Smith makes an elicit contact with a fellow party worker Julia. he feels he is ready to face. Nevertheless. the power of the book is non merely in societal theory provide. but instead in elaborate descriptions of ideas of chief character.

The writer skilfully writes about party’s claims: “But at the same time. true to the rules of doublethink. the Party taught that workers were natural inferiors who must be kept in subjugation. like animate beings. by the application of a few simple regulations ” . When the chief charter is foremost introduced. he is presented a thought felon whose narrative is premised on that spring. Orwell allows following Smith’s life. to portion his occupation. his expostulations to instructions. Besides readers have an first-class chance to detect his love personal businesss and unusual love affair with Julia.

Main hero is hideous with established set of order and he says Julia: “I hatred pureness. I hate goodness! ” Talking about strong points. the book is brightly written. well-structured. The writer writes with a beat vividly showing his thoughts. Development of Winston Smith creates empathy. Possibly. the strongest minute is the last half of the book when Orwell provides replies to the inquiries of involvement. When Smith reads a book about how the taking party remains in power. he is interested why? party provides such discriminatory and unjust policy towards society.

When he asks O’Brien. he is answered every bit bluffly as possible that power should be achieved and retained for the interest of the power. The writer vividly portrays Winston’s letdown saying that society is confronted by absolute power being confident of its ain immortality and catholicity. He thinks of Big Brother recognizing that this plan is confronted because of advancing sex offenses and proliferation. Nevertheless. the weak points are present as good. Actually. the last half of the book. despite being full of sense and accounts. appears non so interesting compared with the beginning.

The writer continues exemplifying new intriguing thoughts and images. though the whole narrative comes to a crashing arrest. Apparently. long descriptions of dry book about political theory makes readers tiring and dull. When Smith appears under anguishs. the writer fails to make intensive atmosphere. Possibly. the book becomes excessively familiar and the fact that Smith fails to face societal order is let downing. The following minute is that the society of Big Brother is excessively idyllically presented to back up man’s opposition.

However. the writer improves the state of affairs after let go ofing Winston. The best piece of the book is re-union of Winston and Julia. The book is relevant to modern society and political doctrine because it aims at spread outing bing cognition of totalitarian political orientations. The writer sheds light on the lives of common people with no ties comparing their chances with that of the absolute power being practiced by party members. The writer provides elaborate overview of totalitarian political orientation researching its deepest corners.