Art: Woman Looking Out To Sea Essay, Research Paper

Art:

Woman looking out to Sea-

? Woman looking out at sea? is a beautiful paper-mache theoretical account of a adult female sitting peacefully on a what seems to be a chair of some kind looking out an fanciful window. This piece has three head colour of orange, xanthous, and blue. This piece of art conveys a batch of feelings and emotions. The adult female seems to be waiting for some one possibly a lover or household member. Her face was sad and perplexed yet calm. I think what Paul Harris is seeking to convey here is the sense of hope, yearning, or nostalgia. While making this beautiful art possibly he was believing of his married woman or a love one. Although simple, I felt that this piece pass on a batch through this plainness. It keeps the spectator thinking leting his or her imaginativeness and emotions roam to make full in the spread. Another facet of this work that connotes repose is its name. The word? sea? has ever had a positive intension. It had ever been used synonymously to peacefulness. I consider this piece to be? artisic? because I feel that I was able to? comprehend? Paul Harris? s position. I was able to see it through his eyes and portion the same emotions it purportedly agitates.

Ecstasy-

The 2nd piece of art that drew me to it the minute I entered the museum was this 1. At first I thought it was merely another one of those abstract art that makes no sense at all. However, closer scrutiny of it reveals that it was a batch more than merely an agreement of forms of different colourss. The main colourss used on this? oil-on-canvas? picture are xanthous, orange, and ruddy. All of these are really bright colourss that each exudes its ain emotions. The adult female in the image was painted ruddy which connote red-hot-passion. The adult female seems to be elated and in a province of rapture as she holds a xanthous curiously molded figure that can be interpret as a adult male. In this image it is hard to find what Han? s Hoffman is seeking to convey. I? m non certain if the adult female herself is in the province of rapture or if the piece of art supposes to raise up a sense of ecstasy upon its spectator. I felt that the piece is slightly somewhat sexually implicative. Nonetheless, I could? ve interpret this wrongly because the word? rapture? is frequently used in past literature that I read interchangeably with climax. It could be that my definition of raptures have been distort by legion Sigmund Freud? s reading that I

hold incurred in the past and henceforth doing me to construe this art sexually. There was no profound ground why I considered this piece? artistic. ? I was merely attracted to it. Possibly the? Idaho? in me is at work once more.

Circus Scene

? Circus Scene? by Alexander Calder was one of the simplest pieces of art at the museum. It is simple in that the spectator did non hold to utilize their imaginativeness to see what was being portrayed. It was obvious. The picture was of a circus pealing with elephants and other animate beings making fast ones. As a kid I have ever had a preference for thaumaturgy and circus fast ones hence this piece of art really much appealed to me. One component of this picture that baffled me when I look at it is the use of colourss. The main colourss used was dark ruddy, brown, and black. These colourss have ever been known to transport with it a melancholic temper. This was what confused me the most. Aren? T circuses supposed to be a happy topographic point? A topographic point for kids? A topographic point with colourful balloons, buffoons, cute animate beings? This circus pealing doesn? Ts have any component of a typical circus. In fact, it was glooming and the animate beings seem to be slightly fierce. The ground why I thought this picture was? artistic? was because I felt that it stirs up? a natural wonder? in me. It had? esthetic? qualities that draw viewing audiences to it.

Not Art

Although colourful and ocular satisfying I felt that the undermentioned work should non be considered art in that it conjures no emotions and it seems to be slightly unvarying. Jackson? s Pollock oil-on-canvas ( which has no name ) is a really uneven picture in that it? s non a image of anything. It was excessively abstract. It is merely an gathering of colourful whirls, smudges, defects, and vilifications. Together it does non do up anything and provoke no emotion except for confusion. The 2nd work in the museum that I don? t consider art is Sam Francis? s acrylic-on-canvas. This painting excessively has no name and besides a similar Jacksons Pollock? s work, it made no sense. It doesn? t represent anything that is touchable. When sing these two work I instantly inquire myself is at that place a hidden, esoteric significance behind these plants? Does each say to arouse some sort of emotion of its ain? But I found no reply to these inquiries. Harmonizing to John Dewey? s definition of art, a work is merely artistic if the spectator can? comprehend? what the creative person sees while he is making it. I could non comprehend anything hence excessively me it? s unartistic.