Cloning Essay Research Paper Human Cloning By

Free Articles

Cloning Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Human Cloning

By: Kelly

Electronic mail: cresidalyn @ aol.com

I have observed in my 19 old ages of life that about everyone in this society strives to be the same or like the popular civilization. The mean individual is really mercenary, and strives for an appealing physical visual aspect. Artificiality is common in the popular civilization. For illustration, deceasing of hair colour, infixing colour contacts, acquiring lyposuction, implants or remotion of defects on the organic structure is prevailing. I strongly oppose human cloning chiefly because I believe that worlds already seek to retroflex themselves plenty and holding the same cistrons is non necessary. Plus, merely because there may be two indistinguishable existences doesn t mean that they will act the same. In this essay will explicate how cloning is achieved, the benefits and dangers of human cloning, turn to my positions on familial favoritism, policies that I suggest to forestall maltreatments of familial technology, and why an exact ringer an ne’er be carried out. First, I will discourse how cloning is made possible. After several efforts, Professor Ian Wilmat and his spouses successfully cloned & # 8220 ; Dolly & # 8221 ; . Cloning is a really intricate procedure and it requires particular equipment and modern engineering. To get down, a cell is removed from the being that is traveling to be replicated, besides known as the giver. The cell is extracted by an scratch in the tegument, a sample of blood or even a piece of the existent tegument. Following, the 2nd reproductive cell is taken from the female being. The full deoxyribonucleic acid ( DNA ) is removed from the karyon. ( Deoxyribonucleic acid contains all the information of heredity. ) A little a saddle horse of DNA is besides removed from the givers cell nucleus. At this clip, the givers DNA is forced into the 2nd cells nucleus. This allows the two cells to be synonymous in footings of cistrons and DNA. Fussion is used to unite the two cells. At this point the bearer must be found, if it is non already present. The bearer is the female that wishes or is willing to give birth to the cloned babe. In some instances nevertheless, the animate beings are given no chioce. Genitic applied scientists merely insert the cells into the female animate being and it will later give birth to a babe that was non of course conceived. The cells are inserted by acerate leaf to the womb and take on the natural procedure of dividing into two cells. The combination of the cells through high tech & # 8220 ; surgery & # 8221 ; and injection mimic the uncoerced procedure of making a babe with the same exact cistrons of the giver. Second, I will discourse the pro s and con s of human cloning. I have found really few benefits of cloning, are over ridded by the drawbacks and con s. The good facet of cloning is the construct that an exact reproduction of the giver will be alive and bing in the same mode, physically. If extras of animate beings are conceived than it will mostly profit the scientific discipline universe. Animals will be used in experimentation. Most likely the animate being will be subjected to a disease or a unpleasant province. Cancer, cystic fibrosis, Burnss and neurodegeneration would be applied to the victims and studied. The test of new therapies and interventions would be given to the animate beings, so that it can assist out the worlds. If animate beings were cloned, their organic structure parts or blood could be transplanted into human organic structures if needed. In fact, animate beings could be created to hold extremely sustainable variety meats merely for grafts. Another illustration is, it appears to be great to cognize that you have a ringer. You would hold another you, younger, to utilize for the replacing of variety meats and organic structure parts. Suppose you were in a tragic auto accident, and you lost both of your weaponries, and damaged several critical variety meats. This would be a bad luck on your portion, and it would be difficult to happen a giver or available to provide these parts instantly. Well, if you had a ringer, I would be certain that person had the exact lucifer of everything! The same blood, and physical features. What a convenience! Another positive facet of human cloning would be the construct that a fantastic individual could be replicated! For illustration, why wouldn T we want another Robin Williams, ( the celebrated comedian/actor ) . Everyone seems to bask his screen personality and edifying comments. Or Tom Cruise, he is a great individual to refashion. He is really fine-looking and he has a great build! A individual that is desirable or known for their distinguished endowments is first-class to hold two-base hit of. Next, human cloning is a discovery for twosomes who desire to hold a babe and of course can t reproduce. A babe can be manufactured, in the lab. Plus the parents have an option of who the babe will be a twin of. Imagine the pleasance that a twosome may acquire from this babe they can name their ain. Scientists may believe that they can immediately bring forth a perfect animate being. There is a definite asset to cloning. Salvaging endangered species. In alteration, there are many drawbacks to human cloning. Basically, human cloning costs a batch. It costs a batch of money, lives, and moral and religious December

ay. The money that it costs to clone humans is outrageously expensive. Equipment that is necessary in the lab is very high-priced. The amount of money that is dedicated to research and experimentation is phenomenal. The development of the perfect laboratory setting is a great investment as well. I would say that the lives that are lost in the attempts to clone a human being are priceless. Money is not a consideration, when precious life in threat or destroyed. A life that is lost due to experimentation is a tragedy in my eyes. Regardless if you are a mouse, if one dies in the result of a science experiment it is simply horrible. When the cloning is not successful, 95% of the time, mutations and diseases are present in the product of experimentation. The cost of losing moral beliefs is irreplaceable as well. It has been proven that morals are disappearing as the twentieth century rushes to a close. People have lost faith and they do not create personal guidelines and rules as keenly as they may have in the past. It is not morally right to reproduce a life artificially. I believe that god created us, and put us on the earth. Scientists who plan on out doing god, and creating such a divine creature are utterly egotistical. They must feel pretty prestigious! It is disgruntling the amount of decay in morality is at stake in this issue. Nature is superior to all. Creating an artificial copy of a priceless life is not right in any shape or form. All spirituality is lost in this cruel act of diverging two tangible organisms forcibly. It is uncertain when our spirit is connected to our bodies but it seems that a spirit may not be as pure and genuine in a fake representation of a human. Although, there is no passage in the Holy Bible that mentions whether cloning is ethically right or wrong, it doesn t need to be written. It is something that was never intended. Thirdly, I believe that there is possibility in our society for genetic discrimination related to experimentation for “harmful genes” if cloning was a reality. It seems that every thing that ever existed or was created is susceptible to discrimination. Once human cloning is made possible, and genetic engineers can achieve a successful twin, (that is free of mutation etc.) then they will try so hard to make a perfect person. They will avoid harmful genes like those that promote a slight threat in longevity or kinks in the life span. Genetic engineers could definitely find people with a great record of heredity. It is the quest for the perfect, healthy being ever. Fourthly, I have suggestions of policies that would prevent abuses of genetic engineering. Federal money should be not allowed to be spent on the research for cloning humans. Scotland was the first country in the world to oppose spending of federal money on the study of human cloning. Scotland s government set an example for the rest of the world by making such an agreement. They took responsibility in not getting involved with this outlandish scientific experiment. The second country to ban federal spending for these purposes was the United States. I believe that these countries should encourage other nations to join them in the refusal of this sort of education. Limits should be declared on the frequency of cloning. Laws should be made to regulate cloning or simply make it illegal. Lastly, an exact copy of a cloned animal can never be obtained. A life is not a toy or a puzzle that can be put together. Life is not a picture that can be traced or re-copied . Life is highly complex, and undeniably irreplaceable. A cloned person will not have the right to think on it s own. Those who create the clone will severely brain wash the subject and treat it much differently than you and I. The clone will be expected to behave similar to the donor and that is a immense amount of pressure. The clone will virtually have it s life lived already, by the donor. The twin will have an unfair chance at life as anyone as we know it. There is no possible way that a clone could lead a regular life. It s environment will be extremely different than the donors. The environment can not be re-created for the replica no matter how hard one has attempted. The parents would always be acting and not living in reality. Although, some day a human can be reproduced to look exactly the same as someone else physically, behavior is uncertain, and they are not programmed to live the same life. Time is another issue. The events that occur in society are not going to be equivalent from one generation to another (assuming the clone is born a different day, or year that the donor was/did). It is virtually impossible to make an exact duplicate of a person. All in all, I oppose human cloning because it violates moral and ethical codes. I described how cloning is carried out, the pro s and con s with genetic engineering of mammals and humans., the potential for genetic discrimination, policies I suggest to prevent abuses of human cloning, and why cloning a human exactly like it s donor is impossible.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out