There are many cardinal differences that are of import to understand between informations oriented and procedure oriented attacks to planing a new system. The system focal point of the informations positions and procedure positions are wholly different. The procedure position focuses on what the systems supposed to make and when. while the informations position has a focal point on what the system needs to run. Another notable difference that distinguishes the two positions is the design stableness.

The design stableness of a procedure position is a more limited attack because concern procedures and the applications that support them are everlastingly altering. whereas a informations position can stand the trial of clip easier because the informations demands of an organisation do non alter as often. In add-on. in the informations organisation procedure orientation informations files are separately designed for in each application. However. with a information position files are designed for the full organisation.

The last notable feature that one should be able to do a differentiation between informations and procedure positions when planing a new system is with the province of the information. In a procedure there is a broad array of variables that allow for a batch of uncontrolled duplicate in the workplace. On the other manus. from a information orientation. the province of informations would be controlled leting for selective duplicate. All of these factors can assist an HR representative determine which information characteristics and procedures are suited for their organisations demands and civilization.

There are many cardinal differences that are of import to understand between informations oriented and procedure oriented attacks to planing a new system. The system focal point of the informations positions and procedure positions are wholly different. The procedure position focuses on what the systems supposed to make and when. while the informations position has a focal point on what the system needs to run. Another notable difference that distinguishes the two positions is the design stableness.

The design stableness of a procedure position is a more limited attack because concern procedures and the applications that support them are everlastingly altering. whereas a informations position can stand the trial of clip easier because the informations demands of an organisation do non alter as often. In add-on. in the informations organisation procedure orientation informations files are separately designed for in each application. However. with a information position files are designed for the full organisation. The last notable feature that one should be able to do a differentiation between informations and procedure positions when planing a new system is with the province of the informations.

In a procedure there is a broad array of variables that allow for a batch of uncontrolled duplicate in the workplace. On the other manus. from a information orientation. the province of informations would be controlled leting for selective duplicate. All of these factors can assist an HR representative determine which information characteristics and procedures are suited for their organisations demands and civilization. The finding of conditions the physical or logical theoretical account is more utile in planing the HRIS is a affair of sentiment.

In citing the book its my apprehension that organisations must foremost hold a strong logical theoretical account and apprehension of it before they can continue with implementing the physical constituents. For this ground entirely. I think its lone logical for me to reason that the logical theoretical account is most utile when planing the HRIS. The logical theoretical account represents the nature of the concern its scheme. Whereas the physical procedure execution is based on functioning the concern by accommodating physical systems that incorporate the concern demands that were found though analysis in the logical design stage.

Therefore. it would be senseless non to implement the physical design of an HRIS without consideration of the logical design system focuses like concern theoretical account. prioritized maps. system theoretical account with input/output and files. and great informations base design based on specific demands. investment in the physical system design may take to future jobs. and turn out to give small to no return on investing. if non more costs from a ensuing re-engineering undertaking.

In kernel. it’s my decision that it is most utile to hold a proper logical mold of a concern foremost. because so a great physical execution will follow. ensuing in ultimate success in the most efficient manner.