Destroying The Delicate Balance Crucial To Survival

Free Articles

Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Is mankind destructing the delicate balance between humanity and nature and jeopardizing endurance of all species? Throughout history we have been forced to accommodate by honing ourselves socially, technologically, and physically to guarantee continued being. In the battle for endurance there is a delicate balance between nature and humanity crucial to all species. We are easy switching this balance in order to command nature. In making so we are seting the well being of all species at risk.Nature is a dynamic presence that demands balance. It has a harmonious agreement that sets up and maintains a province of equilibrium. Nature is by and large thought of as the physical universe and its life beings. Some say it is unlimited and expendable, some that we can utilize but must replace, and others that we can look but non touch. Although sentiment on nature & # 8217 ; s definition varies widely, the bulk of people concur that we are portion of nature and therefore depend upon it.According to the Christian faith, Nature displays the character of God, in its goodness and strength, consistence and concern to prolong human life ( Job 12:17-9 ) . It besides states that adult male is created from the dust of the land ( Gen 2:7 ) . If Man is made from nature and we tamper with it, we are fiddling with ourselves. Therefore if we modify the universe around us so it will modify us. Scientists are presently modifying nature by genetically changing a assortment of species with the usage of a comparatively new procedure called familial technology in the field of biotechnology. Familial use is the conveyance of one or more cistrons from one species to another in order to give an being new features. The intent is to make species that are more productive and immune to disease. Some people believe this new engineering can be good to mankind by bring arounding disease, bettering wellness, profiting agribusiness, and cut downing universe hungriness. Their statement is that in order to last we must eat healthier, hardier nutrients and combat diseases with the techniques available to us. It is survival of the fittest. At the same clip, we have to acknowledge that the usage of new engineering in other Fieldss has caused more jobs than that which it has solved. There has been harm to the environment: a hole put in the ozone bed, contaminated H2O and the violent death of many species. Before we advance and start utilizing familial technology, it is our duty to analyze possible after effects.Supporters of familial technology say that we have used familial use throughout history in procedures such as grafting, cross-pollination and hybridization. In world, we have used natural ( non technologically invasive ) engendering techniques, chiefly with single beings, and

only now are we beginning to understand the details of why and how they work. Before creating a new organism we have to consider how complete our knowledge is of how the system works.With genetic engineering we are penetrating and manipulating the very structure of our existence (DNA) in ways that could never, under any circumstances whatsoever, occur in nature. Through this process of implementing irreversible alterations into the code of life we are providing new information and instructions never before seen. We do not know how it will affect nature and how nature will react back upon us. There has been no long term investigations into any side affects of deliberate gene manipulation.Breeding new species to carry specific traits can be beneficial (a longer growing time, larger fruit, resistance to pests) but it also creates uniformity in the species’ genetic profiles. This causes ?genetic erosion? . As well, we do not know what unknown characteristics, viruses, and diseases might be brought forth by a new combination of genes. The effects of reinforcing a particular characteristic in terms of the overall balance in a species, or what happens when a genetic experiment fails, is also unknown.Biotechnology does not only alter plants and animals but humans as well. It is quite possible that we could be capable of obtaining genetic information and partaking in genetic selection. One day this could open up the possibilities of eugenics to engineer our own children.The repercussions of engineering humans could be astounding. A child artificially engineered would likely see their life in a different way, undergoing a severe identity crisis causing everlasting emotional damage. Where did they really come from? What, if any, characteristics do they share with their parents and family? In addition, are they natural or artificial?We do not know the effects of what is being done; yet we are continuing to proceed anyway. We are taking the dynamics of creation and, through pride and an egocentric attitude, converting it into a central motive of power in which everything revolves around ourselves. Instead we should be creating unity and protecting the precious balance of existence.We should use science where we depend on our experience and proper research to guide us. Using an empirical knowledge base, instead of a strictly theoretical one, science could facilitate growth, providing wisdom. Then science could contribute a better insight into our survival and stop mankind from destroying the balance in the environment that we are depended upon, thus aiding us in the struggle for survival.BibliographyGENETIC ENGINEERING OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS, William Dudley, Greenhaven Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, 1990MICROSOFT BOOKSHELF 99SHAPING GENES, Darryl R.J.Macer, 1990

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out