Developmental Psychology Essay Research Paper There are

Free Articles

Developmental Psychology Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

There are three chief theories of development that I shall discourse in this assignment, ? Cognitive? , the chief theoretician being, ? Piaget? , ( 1896? 1980 ) , The, ? Psychosocial Theory? , ? Erikson? , ( 1902? 1994 ) , and, The? Psychosexual? , of, ? Freud? , ( 1856? 1939 ) .

Cognitive Psychology draws the comparing between the human head and a computing machine, proposing that we like the computing machine procedure the information we get from around us and so respond consequently. Hearnshaw, ( 1987 ) , claims that Cognitive Psychology is both one of the oldest and besides one of the newest parts of Psychology, cited in? T. Malim? , ( 1994 ) . Information is collected through our senses i.e. vision, touch, smell etc and so processed through our encephalon. Cognitive Psychologists mostly seek accounts of Cognitive development, memory, attending, unreal intelligence, perceptual experience and societal knowledge. The methods used are normally Laboratory experiments under controlled fortunes i.e. memory trials, and, Case surveies.

Piaget, ( J ) , ( 1896-1980 ) , carried out instance surveies on his ain kids to analyze the phases of cognitive development. Piaget concluded that the kid was an being which adapts to the environment, he besides studied with the sentiment that all kids went through the same set phases of development and that there were no single differences.

Jean piagets? Phases of Development: & # 8211 ;

The Sensorimotor phase, ( 0-2 ) : & # 8211 ; Early in the sensorimotor phase the kid is wholly egoistic, everything is an extension to the ego, they can? t distinguish themselves from their environment. The kid has no construct of past or future all it is cognizant of is the here and now. The kid relies wholly on it? s senses i.e. sight, hearing, touch. It is believed by Cognitive Psychologists that? .. ? To get down with, a babe will trust on in-built behaviors for sucking, creeping and watching? as cited in Moonie, N, ( 1995 ) . A kid does non understand that an object does non discontinue to be when it is out of sight. However, in contradiction, Bower & A ; Wishart, ( 1972 ) , used infrared cameras to see what the kid does when an object disappears. The kid is shown a bottle in the visible radiation, when the kid reaches to hold on the bottle the visible radiations are turned out. Bower & A ; Wishart recorded that the kid continued to make for the bottle for up to 1.5minutes after the visible radiations are turned out. Another point made by Piaget is that non merely does the kid expression for an object, which is concealed, but besides the kid will non look for it even if portion of it is demoing. The object must be to the full seeable for the kid to look for it. Between the ages 6-7 months the kid will recognize a partially seeable object and by 8 months the kid will look for an object that is wholly concealed, ( all ages are approximative, although Piaget believed kids went through the same phases, he concluded that they wear? t needfully make so at the precisely the same age ) . This realisation that an object still exists even when out of position is called, ? Object Permanence? .

The Pre-operational Stage, ( 2-7 old ages ) : & # 8211 ; Later in the sensorimeter phase the kid will get down to develop the usage of linguistic communication and idea, this is one of the chief go oning developments in the pre-operational phase. This phase derives the rubric of pre-operational because the kid has yet to develop its logical thought and the ability to understand how things operate. Piaget went on to split the pre-operational phase into two parts, the first being, ? Pre-Conceptual? , from the ages 2-4 the kid has no construct of changing differences at this phase everything is either all the same coloring material, size etc. For illustration a kid a kid is given 5 big ruddy bricks and 5 little ruddy bricks, the kid is so asked to screen the big ruddy bricks from the little ruddy bricks, the kid can non separate between the big and the little therefore the kid would merely set all the ruddy bricks together. Piaget called this, ? Syncretic Thinking? , seting objects together because of similarities i.e. color even if the objects are of a different form or size, four balls of different colorss would non be conceived as different colorss by a kid they would merely be seen as four balls as this is their similarity.

At the age of 4-7 the kid reaches the, ? Intuitive? , phase, at this phase the kid has some construct of differences i.e. the kid can separate between the size and coloring material of different colored bricks. However the kid is still what Piaget called, ? Egocentric? , unable to see things from another? s point of position.

? One diverting illustration ( Phillips, 1996 ) is of a four twelvemonth old male child who is asked? Do you hold a brother? ? to which he replies? Yes? . Then he is asked? What? s his name? ? to which he replies? Jim? . Finally in response to the inquiry? Does Jim hold a brother? ? he state? s? No? .

The Concrete Operational Stage ( 7-11 ) : & # 8211 ; A this phase the kid can run objects and understand them supplying they can se them and/or are keeping them. The kid can number, spell, read etc. Although the kid still needs some objects i.e. fingers, playthings to number there is still a demand for ocular aid. The kid is developing a less egoistic position.

The formal Operation Stage ( 11-15 ) : & # 8211 ; At this phase the kid or stripling can now believe hypothetically, ( think about state of affairss, experiences that they may non hold experienced ) . The stripling can believe about different results to state of affairss. The formal stripling can now number without the assistance of objects and can read and compose rather expeditiously.

Psychosexual Stages of Development

Freud, ( 1856-1939 ) , believed that personality which he called, ? Psychic Apparatus? , was divided into three parts, the? ID? , the? EGO? , and, the? SUPEREGO? . Freud besides concluded that these parts were portion of an energy system non portion of the encephalon or the physical ego. In brief the ID is a? Psychic Energy? , which is ruled by the, ? Pleasure Principle? . For illustration inherent aptitude tells the Idaho we are hungry, the Idaho does non desire us to experience unsated therefore we react by seeking nutrient, carry throughing our demand and later sing pleasance. Although our Idaho is present at birth and continues to be to decease comparatively un-changed when we are babies we still need to understand that although we cry when we are hungry it is up to another to construe our weeping and feed us until we develop the abilities to feed ourselves. The Idaho does nevertheless transport a automatic reaction i.e. winking when there is something in our oculus, rubing when we itch, rubbing ourselves if we have a bump etc. The full point of the Idaho is to keep satisfaction.

The Ego is the portion of the Idaho, which is ruled by the, ? Reality Principle? , it develops through societal influences and is the portion of the Idaho that is logical and rational. The Ego can command our Psychic energy by proroguing demands, for illustration if we were in a traffic jam and we were hungry the bulk of people would non merely acquire out the auto and seek nutrient, our self-importance would state us that we should wait until we get to the following service station. Babies do non hold this ability directly off a kid will shout until another provenders them. The self-importance besides considers the feelings of others i.e. the self-importance would non see it appropriate to brake air current in a room full of people! The difference between the Idaho and the self-importance is, the Idaho is merely concerned about what it wants whereas the self-importance is concerned about when and how to acquire it.

The Superego, this is the scruples and moral portion of the Idaho. The scruples tells the self-importance when we do something incorrect i.e. we feel guilty for making something. On the other manus when we do something right or good we feel good our self-esteem is increased. For illustration a immature individual wants to smoke a coffin nail but they are in their parents place and their parents are non merely in but they would be angry if they caught them, the Idaho wants a coffin nail, the self-importance tells the Idaho to travel outside and the superego tells both that wherever the coffin nail is smoked it is incorrect so the self-importance feels guilty.

One facet of Freud? s theory of development is that babies and immature kids are capable of sexual pleasance and do hold sexual experiences, ? Infantile Sexuality? . It is of import to observe that the usage of the term gender is non used to depict sexual satisfaction i.e. sexual intercourse ; Freud uses the term

To depict the demand by babes and older kids for physical pleasance, i.e. some kids like to hold their dorsum tickled, or, their hair played with. ? Childish Sexuality? , is a term used to depict any signifier of sexual pleasance received from another and non needfully a member of the opposite gender. Freud believed that if the kid did non have equal pleasance i.e. by parents so this would ensue in their Idaho going frustrated hence in ulterior life the grownup would be affected.

Freud strongly believed that if the kid does non have adequate pleasance in the right equal manner throughout their phases of Psychosexual development so this would be the root of all hereafter jobs.

? Development for Freud is a complex interaction between a biologically programmed timetable of alteration and the environment or societal context in which it happens ( Stevens, 1995 ) and if we want to understand the grownup, we need to retrace their childhood ; hence? the kid is father to the adult male? .

Gross, ( R ) , ? The Science of Mind and Behaviour? , ( 1996 )

Psychosexual phases of development: –

Oral Stage ( 0-1 twelvemonth ) , This phase can be divided into two, the? Receptive/ Incorporative Substage? , at this phase, the early few months, the kid is about wholly dependent and inactive. At this phase the child gets great pleasance from sucking, get downing and seting things in their oral cavity. The female parent? s chest is really of import to the kid as it gives most pleasance. The kid will suck anything even if there is no nutrient. After a few months the kid moves into the. ? Biting/Aggressive Substage? , at this point the kid starts masticating and seize with teething things it is besides at this phase that the kid starts to show love and hatred for the same object i.e. the female parent.

Anal phase ( 1-3 old ages ) , the pleasance at this phase is focused on the anal pit, and once more this phase can be divided into two substages, ? Ejection? , the kid has the desire to go through fecal matters where it wants to and when it wants to and it is at this point that they learn that pleasance is gained through congratulations from parents when they have done something good i.e. enamored preparation, remaining dry through the dark. However in the ulterior phases, ? Retention? , the parents can now be seen as authorization figures as it is a this phase that the kid additions pleasure from anal keeping and few parents see this is as a point of congratulations.

Phallic phase ( 3-5/6 old ages ) , at this phase the kid becomes cognizant of their genitalias, although boys find them a beginning of pleasance misss do non until they reach pubescence. Male childs have to larn to command their desire for their female parent, for fright of emasculation by their male parent. This decision is drawn foremost because it is at this phase that boys get down masturbating and the fat

her will non excuse this giving the kid a fright of emasculation. Second it is at this phase the male childs first love is his female parent who belongs to his male parent. Therefore the kid learns to conceal his desire for his female parent in bend avoiding emasculation. The misss autumn in love with their male parents but because of enviousness, the male parent has a phallus and she does non this is known as, ? Penis Envy? . Believing that the female parent has castrated her the miss will experience unequal later desiring a babe alternatively and hence directed her love to her male parent. Whereas boys fear the male parent who they deem to be the more powerful because he has what the kid wants and the menace of emasculation Freud believed that although the miss believed herself to hold already been castrated she is in fright of losing her female parents love besides.

Latency Period ( 5/6 old ages ) , at this phase the kid is controlled by the Idahos desire for sexual relationships. Therefore the kid tends to play with kids of the same sex so as to avoid these desires. Through instruction the kid is taught that they are to immature to indulge in sexual activities.

Psychosocial Development

Erikson, ( 1902-194 ) , concluded that a worlds development is determined genetically and that in order to travel through each phase of development than they must be biologically, socially and psychologically ready. Erikson believed that the kid? s cistrons resembled a timetable and it is this familial timetable that determines the kid? s phases of development.

? Erikson extended this rule to societal and psychological growing ; it is human nature to go through through a preset sequence of psychosocial phases which are genetically determined? . Gross, ( R ) , The Science of Mind and Behaviour. ( 1996 )

The Psychosocial Stages

Erikson concluded that every personality has a certain sum of trust and misgiving that is indispensable to development through the phases. Erikson did nevertheless propose that although the clip to develop trust is in babyhood he did propose that under develop trust could be farther develop in ulterior life nevertheless it would be harder to make.

Basic Trust Versus Mistrust ( 0-1 ) : & # 8211 ; This phase is indispensable to the kid? s development of trust toward non merely it? s parents peculiarly the female parent, but how it trusts the remainder of the universe. If a kid is good loved i.e. fondness, cuddles etc. so it will develop an adequate of trust for the universe, nevertheless should the kid receive inadequate attention so it will turn to distrust. Trust enables the kid to see state of affairss without fright whereas mistrust causes the kid to fear, acting with intuition perchance even backdown.

Autonomy Versus Shame and Doubt ( 1-3 ) : & # 8211 ; A this phase the kid becomes nomadic, funny and by and large more independent. The ability to be able to see itself as it? s ain individual separate from it? s parents is known as, ? Autonomy? . It is at this point that all the parents should still guarantee the kid? s good being they should still keep a caring attitude and safe environment. At this phase if the kid is put down or take to believe it is a failure on a continual footing so the kid may develop a feeling of shame and uncertainty in it? s abilities and it? s environment. Leting the kid to make things for itself and larning by its errors gives the kid assurance and an increased self-pride. Doing things for the kid all the clip and stating the kid they are incorrect will hold the contrary consequence. It is at this phase that if a kid is non praised and allowed to make things for itself that insecurity appears i.e. in the signifier of attending seeking.

Initiative Versus Guilt ( 3-5/6 ) : -The kid is detecting and developing new abilities and because of this the kid? s desire for cognition is besides increasing. The kid should be encouraged to inquire inquiries and equal replies should be given. Play is besides a important portion in the kid? s mental and physical development. If the parent attempt? s to halt this inquiry inquiring or play the kid will develop a feeling of guilt about it? s desire to larn.

Industry Versus Inferiority ( 7-12 ) : & # 8211 ; At this phase other grownups other than parents begin to hold significance in the kid? s development. The kid becomes interested in the manner things work, and are carried out. Relationships with other kids should besides be encouraged, as kids need to compare themselves with others in order to develop their ain individuality. Failing to offer the kid the right resources, comfortss, counsel and encouragement will ensue in the kid experiencing inferior.

Self Concept

? In the societal jungle of human being, there is no feeling of being alive without a sense of self-importance individuality? , Erik Erikson, ( 1963 ) , Moonie, N, ( 1995 ) .

Self-concept is an single? s perceptual experience of their personality. Along with the self-concept is Self-awareness ; this is how an single imagines how others see them. The Self-concept can be divided into three meshing constituents, Self-image, Self-esteem and the Ideal-self.

Self Image: & # 8211 ; This refers to the manner we describe ourselves physically, mentally and emotionally, be it good or bad.

Kuhn & A ; McPortland ( 1954 ) Gross p.519 Suggest that the ego image possibly broken into three classs,

? Social Roles? , the facets of our self-image that are nonsubjective i.e. , pupil, employee, spouse. Others can corroborate these facets they are definite facets

? Personality Traits? : & # 8211 ; these facets of our self-image that we perceive of ourselves may be confirmed or contradicted by another? s sentiment or opinion of us.

? Physical ego? ; & # 8211 ; this refers to the physical facets of our self-image i.e. , tall, short, thin

? Self-Esteem? : & # 8211 ; ? A personal opinion of worthiness, that is expressed in the attitudes the single holds towards himself? . Coopersmith ( 1967 ) Gross p.520

The degree of our self-pride is reliable on how we feel about ourselves, do we like the manner we are, do we like the manner we act, look etc. Our self-esteem can be greatly affected by outside influences i.e. a immature individual who is invariably told they are stupid by their parents is likely to hold a low self-esteem believing they are stupid and possibly even inadequate.

? Ideal Self? : & # 8211 ; this refers to the type of individual we want others to comprehend us as. Our self-image and in turn self-esteem may be affected by this because if we are diffident and want others to see us as out-going and confident, so because we aren? t so we aren? T wholly happy with ourselves. Almost all the immature people I have been working with like to convey an out-going personality, nevertheless when I got to cognize some of them they are really rather diffident. Other immature people can besides come across as being rather aggressive in their behavior and once more after speaking to them for a piece it appears some of them are making this to conceal the fact that they are afraid that they will be seen as, ? Wimps? , this is particularly obvious in the male childs.

? Symbolic Interactionism? , this is a theory ab initio instigated by, James, ( 1890 ) , it emphasises the importance of interaction with the environment, responding towards things as if they are symbols with significances. The theory implies that linguistic communication is of import and the ability to comprehend another? s point of position is indispensable in the development of an person? s self-concept. James, went on to pull a differentiation between the self-as-subject, ( I ) , and self-as-object, ( ME ) . The, ( I ) being the inner chief self-perception although we have a multifaceted ego i.e. depending on who we are interacting with will act upon the ego we are projecting. James besides concluded that with every relationship we have we construct a different personality. Cooley, ( 1902 ) , influenced by James, besides concluded that we do hold multiple egos formed by interactions with others. It is the reactions of others that tell us about ourselves ; this is known as, ? The Looking? Glass Self? . As we grow up we form a construct of ourselves by the reactions, opinions, sentiments etc. of parents, instructors, friends, Again each person we interact with may hold a different reactions, sentiments etc. how we see ourselves will depend on who? s positions, sentiments we take on board. An illustration of this can be seen in the alterations in the behavior, sentiments and visual aspect of immature people when they interact with different persons, i.e. when they are on their ain they can be rather pleasant and concerted nevertheless, if they are in a group a figure of them can be loud, out-going and even aggressive perchance so they are non seen as being, ? Square? , or, ? Boring? . The amusing thing here is that when others talk about them they frequently complain about their behavior when they are in a group.

Argyle, ( 1969,1983 ) , believed that there are four major influences on the development of self-concept: –

The reaction of others: & # 8211 ; the immature people are ever really witting of others reactions, particularly their equals, about new hairdos, apparels etc.

Comparison with others: & # 8211 ; an illustration of this can be seen at exam clip when the immature people are intrigued about the consequences of others it is particularly obvious among brothers and sisters.

Social Roles: & # 8211 ; An first-class illustration of this is, three immature adult females, two of which are sisters who seldom see oculus to oculus, were holding a statement, one of the misss who is non one of the sisters went to hit one of the sisters, the other sister instantly jumped in and said, ? You dare hit her and I? ll hit you? ? ? ? when I asked her afterwards why she stuck up for her even though they are ever contending she said, ? She? s my sister of class I? m traveling to lodge up for her? .

Designation: & # 8211 ; Have you of all time noticed the skate male childs, and their baseball caps, sweatshirts, loose-fitting pants and trainers? Or the voguish misss with their glittery make-up, fiting hairdos, and similar apparels? There appears to be a demand to hold something in common the demand to place with each other.

Adolescence brings about many alterations physically, mentally, emotionally and socially. Puberty brings with it rather dramatic alterations in the organic structure and alterations in sexual feelings and desires. Many of the immature people I have worked with are between the ages of 11 and 18 all at different phases of development. One of the most obvious observations I have made, in peculiar with the immature adult females is their desire to affect non merely other immature adult females but the immature work forces besides. Every clip I have been in a group there is ever one immature individual with a new brace of trainers, album or nomadic phone! ! Although Argyle suggested there is a demand for Identification, ? Harmonizing to Coleman, ( 1995 ) , the development of individuality requires non merely experiencing separate from others, but besides cognizing how one appears to the remainder of the universe. Dramatic bodily alterations earnestly affect these facets of individuality and stand for a considerable challenge in version for even the most good adjusted immature individual. Consequently, the timing of the adolescent growing jet may hold an of import consequence on the stripling? s self-concept, particularly self-esteem? . Sighted in, ? Psychology The Science of Mind and Behaviour? , Gross, ( R ) , ( 1996 ) .

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out