Leadership. as defined in the book Leadership Challenge ( 1995 ) . is a set of patterns that is discernible and learnable. It is non something mystifying and sublime by which common and ordinary people can non understand. If a individual is bestowed with an chance for feedback and pattern. and has the desire to take and to do a difference. he can well develop his abilities to make so ( Kouzes and Posner 1995: four ) and be a leader. On the contrary. scheme is a program of action which consequences from the intended and determined to accomplish a specific end ( Farlex 2009 ) .
There are a batch of known leaders in the universe because they make a alteration and a difference. They are innovators for a certain motion that. for case. convey peace and freedom in their land. Or sometimes. they are the grounds why their company has been saved from bankruptcy or collapsed. There may be a myriad of well-known people in the kingdom of leading and yet. anyone. even in their ain small ways can be a leader and can decidedly be called as leader. One of the leaders whom I know is the vice-president of a women’s organisation. She is a bookman and a consistent award pupil since her fresher in college.
She may non be that celebrated in the whole university but she does be. The organisation where she belongs is already out of figure and their President has non showed up since she is non presently enrolled therefore she does non hold the privilege to govern and to take a lead in the organisation. Decidedly. being the frailty president in the roll of officers agencies that she has to transport out all the duties of the president. Presently. the organisation is composed of 10 members: seven of them are members of the Executive Committee. where cabal exists due to political grounds and belief.
Bing the vice-president. who needs non be biased with the bing division in the group. how did she pull off to unify the cabal. to increase the figure of their members and to transport out all their organisational activities with a limited figure of collaborating people? Bing in the place. she has the power to take the members. In order to grok the nature of leading. one must understand the kernel of power. because leading is a particular signifier of power ( Burns 1978:12 ) .
The manner she exercises her power as a vice-president every bit good as a president has something to make with her motivations and resources—her end for the organisation and for her members. Harmonizing to Burns. motivations and resources are two critical factors of leading for they are interrelated. If a individual lacks motivation. the resource diminishes. If one lacks resource. motor becomes idle. Therefore. missing either one. power subsides and disintegrates ( 1978: 12 ) . On the other manus. the cabal in the group has something to make with political relations. the kernel and exercising of power.
If the past leaders of the organisation have used their power for self-interest and laterality in the group. the current vice-president is different. She merely manages and organizes meetings. every bit good as thoughts. But those thoughts. for illustration. for a certain activity that needs to be carried out. come from the members of the group. Everyone is entitled to talk out and to portion their ideas. There might be a division in the proposed thoughts. but decidedly. those propositions that are non chosen. are still in line for possible options if the chosen proposal has non worked out.
On the contrary. the decision-making in the organisation is put into action by agencies of ballots and quorum. Everyone is entitled to collaborate. If there are resistances. those resistances will be heard. The demands with her as the leader of the group may look high. but she has achieved to pull off all the quandaries because in everything she does. she is driven by her motive to elate the organisation. Her enthusiasm with her work and duty has spread among its members that decidedly assist in the cooperation ; the cabal in the group has disintegrated. and therefore. the enlisting of members has been done.
Decidedly. the members have increased its figure. Furthermore. whoever the following leader that will be elected. she is surely been defied to make her best and to govern for her members and for the organisation. non for her self-interest and fulfillment. but for the group. List of
Mentions:
Burns. J. ( 1978 ) Leadership. New York: Harper Torchbooks. Farlex ( 2009 ) The Free Dictionary. [ on-line ] available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. thefreedictionary. com/strategy. Kousez J. and Posner. B. ( 1995 ) An Instructor’s Guide to the Leadership Challenge. New York: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
