The Lord of the Fliess by William Golding is narrative of a group of immature male childs who become stranded on a deserted island after their plane clangs. Intertwined in this authoritative novel are many subjects. most that relate to the built-in immorality that exists in all human existences and the malicious nature of world. In The Lord of the Flies. Golding shows the boys’ gradual transmutation from being civilized. well-bred people to savage. ritualistic animals. From the clip that the male childs land on the island. both a power battle and the first marks of the boys’ built-in immorality. Piggy’s jeer. occur.

After blowing the conch and citing all the male childs to come for an assembly. an election is held. “I ought to be main. said Jack with simple haughtiness. because I’m chapter chorister and caput boy” ( Golding 22 ) . After Ralph is elected Chief. Jack envies his place and invariably battles for power with Ralph throughout the remainder of the novel. converting the remainder of the male childs to fall in his folk instead than to remain with Ralph. Besides. shortly after the male childs arrive at the island. Piggy. a physically weak and vulnerable character. is mocked and jeered at by the other male childs.

After seeking to tell all of the liluns’ names. Piggy is told to “Shut up. Fatty. ” by Jack Merridew. Ralph comments by stating. “He’s non Fatty. His existent name’s Piggy. ” All of the male childs on the island. except for Piggy. laugh and do themselves more comfy at Piggy’s disbursal. “A storm of laughter arose and even the tiniest kid joined in. For a minute the male childs were a closed circuit of understanding with Piggy exterior. “ ( Golding 21 ) . The male childs instinctively become more comfy with one another after Piggy’s jeer and make a bond. go forthing Piggy on the exterior.

While Jack and Ralph are researching the island. they encounter a piggy which Jack purportedly attempts to kill. After deriving the bravery to kill the babe hog. Jack rectifies the state of affairs by stating “I was merely waiting for a minute to make up one’s mind where to knife him ( Golding 31 ) . ” This event clearly illustrates that along with built-in immorality. “man is [ besides ] capable of being good and sort. and has to pick and free will to take which 1 he will go. “ ( Ridley 97 ) Jack’s clemency is ephemeral. nevertheless. and when they encounter another hog. Jack and his huntsmans are grim.

They return to beach ritualistically intoning “Kill the hog. Cut her pharynx. Spill her blood. ” where they excitedly explain the inside informations of the Hunt. “I cut the pig’s pharynx. ’ said Jack. proudly. and yet twitched as he said it ( Golding 69 ) . Jack is internally fighting between his civilised instructions and barbarian inherent aptitudes in this illustration. in which he both proudly exclaims his slaying and vellications while making so. Another illustration of the boy’s built-in immorality is the barbarous slaying of the sow. Without any respect for the sow’s neonates. Jack commands his folk to assail it.

The male childs “hurled themselves at her. This awful eruption from an unknown universe made her frenetic ; she squealed and bucked and the air was full of perspiration and noise and blood and terror” ( Golding 135 ) . The animalistic behaviour of the male childs frightens the sow. and the reader every bit good. After the decease of the sow. the male childs play with its blood and ritualistically observe their putting to death. Jack “giggled and flicked them while the male childs laughed at his smacking thenars. Then Jack grabbed Maurice and rubbed the material over his cheeks” ( Golding 135 ) . The male childs show no clemency for the sow and behave like barbarians.

The slaying of the sow allows the male childs to “revert back to [ their ] crude instincts” ( Garbarino 96 ) and lose all hints of guilt and scruples. In the novel. Ralph and Piggy represent intelligence. ground. and a authorities. They besides try to abstain from fall backing back to their crude inherent aptitudes and utilize ground to seek and convert the other male childs to make the same. “Which is better- to be a battalion of painted Indians like you are. or to be reasonable like Ralph is? “ ( Golding 180 ) provinces Piggy. The boys’ crazed reaction to Piggy’s inquiry illustrates Piggy’s point about the civility of himself and Ralph. compared to Jack and the remainder of the folk.

Many times throughout the book. Piggy is the voice of ground and helps to steer Ralph along that same route if he loses his manner. After call on the carpeting Samneric for being pessimistic about their destiny. Ralph momently forgets the grounds why the signal fire is so of import. “He tried to retrieve. Smoke. he said. we want fume. Course we have. Cos the smoke’s a signal and we can’t be rescued if we don’t have smoke. I knew that! Shouted Ralph” ( Golding 172 ) . Ralph begins to lose his initial sunniness and enthusiasm and replaces it with neutrality and pessimism.

Piggy and Ralph separate themselves from Jack and his folk and go on to keep their “government” . However. when Jack and his folk kill a hog and invite Ralph and Piggy to fall in their banquet. the two accept and can non defy the enticement of the meat. Subsequently on in the jubilation. Jack and his folk execute a ritualistic dance. in which Piggy and Ralph subsequently articulation. “Piggy and Ralph. under the menace of the sky. found themselves eager to take a topographic point in this demented but partially unafraid society” ( Golding 152 ) . They realize that the dance fueled the male childs to slay Simon. and subsequently deny their participance in it.

“We left early. said Piggy rapidly. because we were tired” ( Golding 158 ) . Ralph and Piggy recognize the immorality in the dance. and know that if the others found out about their participance in it. so the male childs would claim that Piggy and Ralph would be traveling against their ain beliefs. Besides. by non acknowledging their partaking in the dance. Piggy and Ralph are denying their engagement in Simon’s slaying and their built-in immorality. They do non believe that evil exists within them and believe that it will “disappear” if they do non believe in it.

Simon and Ralph represent goodness and ground. and both encounter the Lord of the Flies. The Lord of the Flies is the caput of a hog which is sacrificially given to the animal in order to continue the boys’ safety. Simon is the first to speak with the Lord of the Flies. and when he does. he learns that the animal ( evil ) is non in an animate being out in the forests. but in the boys themselves. “Fancy you believing the Beast was something you could run and kill. You knew didn’t you? I’m portion of you. ” ( Golding 143 ) says the Lord of the Fliess to Simon.

The Lord of Flies says that the animal is non a physical manifestation that is in the signifier of an animate being that can be hunted and killed. but resides inside the psyche of the male childs on the island. The Lord of the Flies even says that the Beast is portion of Simon. the symbol of goodness. proposing that all human existences are born with both some immoralities and goodness. Subsequently on while Ralph is flying from Jack and his folk. he stumbles upon the Lord of the Flies. “Little spines of esthesis ran up and down his dorsum. The dentition grinned. the empty sockets seemed to keep his regard masterfully and without effort” ( Golding 185 ) .

Soon after. Ralph hits the pig’s caput and smashes it into pieces. By destructing the Lord of the Flies. Ralph denies his internal immorality and crude inherent aptitudes. The difference between Ralph’s and Simon’s brush with the Lord of the Flies is that Simon accepts The Lord of the Fliess and listens intently to what it is stating to him. However. Ralph destroys it and so walks off from it. Both Ralph’s and Simon’s experience with the Lord of the Flies states that “all work forces are capable of immorality. and evil is built-in in all human existences. without exclusion. ” ( Ridley 107 ) The Lord of the Flies illustrates the capablenesss of immorality in all things.

All of the male childs on the island are tempted by immorality. but non all of them give in to the craving. However. along with the immorality that lies within all people. there is besides a touch of goodness. proposing that all people have the free will to take their fate. The boys’ battle between their lawless drive force. and Ego. their sense and principle. stand for the ongoing feud between good and evil and is both exciting and emotional. The Lord of the Flies is a wonderfully written novel that will stay in the Black Marias of all who read it. and affect all who encounter it. much like the immorality which it describes.

Work Cited Garbarino. Ph. D. James. Lost Boys Why Our Sonds Turn Violent and How We Can Salvage Them. New York. New york: The Free Press. 1999. Ridley. Matt. Nature Via Nurture. Great Britain: Harper Collins Publishers Inc. . 2003. Neubauer. M. D. . Peter B. . and Alexander Neubauer. Nature’s Thumbprint. New Tork: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Inc. . 1990. Burnham. Terry. and Jay Phelan. Mean Genes. Cambridge. Ma: Perseus Publishing. 2000. Golding. William. Lord of the Flies. The Berkley Publishing Group.