Cornucopian position borrows its name from Cornucopia which is a Grecian word mentioning to ‘the horn of plenty’ in other words typifying copiousness. On the other manus. the school of idea called neo Malthusian has its foundations in an essay titled ‘An essay on the rule of population’ written by Reverend Thomas Malthusian and the school is called after him ( Muir. 2008 ) . This essay seeks to compare and contrast the two schools of idea. Differences Cornucopian perceives the supply of resources as space.
They have supported their claims by stating that human existences in the past feared running out of resources. which has ne’er happened. and every clip they feared. they found more others or replacements. This is why the school has been termed as optimistic. ( Muir. 2008 ) . On the other manus. the pessimism of neo Malthusian contradicts this position by saying that the growing of the population can take topographic point at a faster rate than how nutrient can be increased or produced and this would intend running out of resources if the restriction of the population growing does non take topographic point ( Muir. 2008 ) .
For cornucopian school. they are cognizant of the population addition but for them they welcome it in contrast to the Malthusians. For them. population growing coincides with economic development. This is because. the increased population would supply the stimulation needed for alteration technologically and besides in detecting resources that are new. This contradicts the Malthusians who think population growing would merely take to economic diminution ( William. 1995 ) .
Cornucopias see the policies to be implemented to step in in the population growing would non bear fruits and the restrictions that would be imposed on the same would merely decline things by interfering with the market. This contradicts the school of Malthusians who are naming for immediate policies to cut down the population growing and if it does non go on. they warn of serious effects ( William. 1995 ) Similarities The two positions are evolutionary in character. In all the schools. the term ‘evolutionary’ has been used but with different significances.
The 2nd thing is that the disciples of these schools see themselves as iconoclastic. They are fond of contrasting their ain positions with the ‘orthodoxy’ 1s which chiefly represent the economists’ conventional wisdom. The two schools posit different orthodoxies ; for illustration. the neo Malthusians believe that orthodoxy is a belief in the markets capableness of postulating with and making off with resource restraints but for the cornucopian. it is a religion in resource constraints’ permanence and immutableness.
Furthermore. both schools hold on to the claim that they hold a minority position and both of them take their oppositions to be supporting the bulk ( William. 1995 ) . I tend to differ with Malthusians view that population growing would convey jobs which is non the instance in the state called China. The population of China is the highest in the universe and still it has been observed that it is turning economically at a really high rate.
This strengthens the cornucopia’s position that population growing coincides with economic development. Mentions Muir. P. ( 2008 ) . Cornucopian versus New Malthusian perspectives. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //people. oregonstate. edu/~muirp/cornucop. htm William. J. ( 1995 ) . Population growing: A comparing of evolutionary positions. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. accessmylibrary. com/article-1G1-17391343/population-growth-comparison-evolutionary. hypertext markup language
