Nuclear Proliferation Essay, Research Paper

The Unites States and the remainder of the atomic nine are confronting a job, a job that determines the safety of the universe, atomic proliferation. Nuclear proliferation is the spread of atomic arms to other states. It is a really critical issue because of the harm atomic arms can hold on the universe. Presently there are five declared atomic states including the US, Russia, The United Kingdom, France, China, India, and Pakistan. So, what is the best manner to turn to the inquiry of atomic proliferation in the approaching century? In this paper, I will province my positions on the inevitableness of atomic proliferation and the positions of others, and I will turn to what will go of the lifting proliferation of atomic engineering. I believe that leting atomic arms to distribute will merely jeopardize the universe in the long tally and that unless we act now, we will non be able to see another two thousand old ages of the human race.

During the Second World War, the United States created the atomic bomb. The U.S. spent over $ 2 billion dollars in 1945 on the Manhattan undertaking in fright that the Germans might win in making a similar arm. However, the German & # 8217 ; s did non earnestly prosecute the development of the atomic arms during World War II. Four old ages after, the United States exploded the first atomic bomb in 1945 over Hiroshima, the Soviet Union tested their ain, therefore get downing the Cold War. For about 50 old ages, the United States and Soviet Union lived on the brink of a 3rd universe war. However, that twenty-four hours ne’er came, but the terminal of the Cold War brought a new menace, atomic proliferation. This menace is serious and the universe should look at extinguishing atomic arms wholly.

The dangers that can originate from mismanaged proliferation are profound and legion. There is the danger that the proliferation procedure itself could give one of the bing atomic powers a strong inducement to halt a non-nuclear neighbour from fall ining the atomic nine. For illustration, Israel ( an undeclared Nuclear Power ) used force to halt Iraq from geting a atomic capableness. There is besides the danger that an unstable atomic competition could emerge among some of the new atomic provinces like India and Pakistan. India and Pakistan are in a desperate place because both sides have the agencies to blow one another up and make it without the universe interfering ( Blanco 32 ) . They might miss the resources to do their atomic forces invulnerable, which could make first-strike inducements. Besides, there is the danger that proliferation would increase the hazard that atomic arms could be fired by accident, captured by terrorists, or alteration ownership because of rickety authoritiess.

In add-on to random errors authoritiess could do, the menace of atomic proliferation and the United States reluctance to mind the job has merely given the universe more ground to reason over the job. Article VI of the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty links non-proliferation and disarming by perpetrating the parties to prosecute dialogues & # 8220 ; in good religion & # 8221 ; to stop the nuclear-arms race and to accomplish & # 8220 ; atomic disarmament. & # 8221 ; Top U.S. functionaries ( and British, French, and Russian functionaries ) acknowledge in private that they view Article VI as an incommodiousness to which they must pay occasional lip service. They argue that their atomic arms do non endanger states such as India, Pakistan, or Iran. Consequently, any effort to bind non-proliferation to atomic disarming is simply a political stalking-horse to cover regional and domestic motives for seeking atomic arms. This statement has merit, but non so much as guardians of the atomic position quo think. The high military value that the nuclear-weapon provinces put on their armories throughout the Cold War, and their involuntariness to devaluate them significantly since 1991, has doubtless influenced other provinces. States can readily claim a concatenation of security menaces that lead back to the five declared nuclear-weapons provinces: For case, Pakistan & # 8217 ; s atomic aspirations stem from India & # 8217 ; s, which stem from China & # 8217 ; s, which stem from those of Russia and the United States. Meanwhile, Iran says it is threatened by Amer

ican and Israeli atomic arms. The atomic powers can and should marshal strong statements that in fact India ( and by extension Pakistan ) , Iran, and Iraq would deduce less security from constructing equal atomic forces to counter their putative menaces than from prosecuting bilateral, regional, and international diplomatic negotiations to cut down tensenesss. Easing tensenesss will merely come from a committedness of the devastation of all atomic arms.

Besides, the US should acknowledge that it has the responsibility to take the manner for the devastation of all atomic arms because it is the wealthiest and most technically advanced in the universe. But if the United States does non take the manner to the devastation of all atomic arms it will confront an enemy that is progressing every twenty-four hours. For illustration, in the Fall of 1999, North Korea tested a Taepodong missile over Japan. The United States was stunned because they were non cognizant that North Korea had that sort of capableness at that clip. Another illustration of the United States being caught off guard by a turning enemy are the recent Pakistani atomic trials. In 1999, Pakistan exploded a stronger atomic bomb resistance. Pakistan did trials even after the United States posed economic countenances. If the United States does non move rapidly to set an terminal to all atomic arms, it will one twenty-four hours happen an enemy proving a missile over Hawaii.

Finally, I disagree that the universe should maintain a reserve for atomic arms but others disagree with me. Many advocators of the bomb believe that by keeping a atomic arms reserve, the opportunities of war are decreased. Meaning, if side A has the bomb and onslaughts side B, they risk being attacked by side B who besides has the bomb. In the terminal, both sides are left in ruins and without any sort of triumph. Well, this point does hold some cogency but does non advert the tensenesss it creates amongst both sides. For illustration, better missiles could be built to break the result of an all out atomic war. In other words, an weaponries race is created. An arms race does non merely stultify and economic system but besides creates possible decease. If the Soviet authorities did non pass every bit much it had on a weaponries race, a Soviet Republic would still hold had opportunity ( Bonnier 90 ) . Humans have a scruples and hence have the ability to believe things out, so why use a atomic arm? ( Feinstein ) . The usage of a atomic arm seems really crude because it is a manner to blow each other up consciously. We are one race, the human race and we must recognize that by maintaining this arm around it is traveling to make us more harm than good. For illustration, Murphy s jurisprudence provinces, if something bad can be done, necessarily it will be done ( Murphy 45 ) . Fortunately, cipher has used atomic arms in 50 old ages. There are besides those who believe that cut downing a atomic reserve bit by bit is more practical than a rapid riddance. However, a gradual riddance is a long procedure in which many things can travel incorrect such as the bomb falling into the incorrect custodies. For illustration, Russia is crippled economically right now and by non perpetrating to a entire riddance, selling a atomic arm could be really attractive to person who has entree to atomic arms.

At the morning of the twenty-first century, there are more than six 1000 atomic arms. Six thousand atomic arms is more than plenty to destruct the Earth over five times. It is sad to believe at a clip of peace, we are still believing of destructing person, ourselves ( Abraham 31. ) In the last month the Russian authorities month approved the SALT II plan. This plan will see the decrease of half of all Russian and US atomic arms. This is a start, and if the human race wants to see another 2000 thousand old ages of its being, we should non be dissemblers to life itself and we must free ourselves of such ugly arms now.

Feinstein, Barbara. Disappearing Wind. Dallas: Ian smiths, 1992.

Blanco, Scott. Modern Weapons: Nuclear Weapons. Castle Rock: Macmillan, 1992

Bonnier, Frank. Interview with General Chassis. 22 September 1989.

Abraham, Mark. Versus Us. New York: Lamount, 1987.

Murphy, Alexander. The Flaming Winds of War. Frederick: Johnson, 1994