On Pride And Prejudice, Which In Your Opinion, Comes In For T Essay, Research Paper

Pride and Prejudice.

& # 8220 ; On pride and bias, which in your sentiment comes in for sharper unfavorable judgment from Austen. Support your reply by mentioning to specific incidents and episodes. & # 8221 ;

pride n. , v. , 1. high ( or excessively high ) sentiment of one? s ain self-respect, importance, worth, etc. 2. the status or feeling of being proud. 3. a baronial sense of what is due to oneself or one? s place or character ; self respect ; self esteem.

bias n. , v. , 1. an sentiment ( normally unfavorable ) , formed beforehand or without cognition, thought, or ground. 2. disadvantage ensuing from some opinion or action of another. 3. the resulting hurt or loss.

In my sentiment, pride comes in for the sharper unfavorable judgment by Austen. She has chosen to body this trait in several characters in & # 8220 ; Pride and Prejudice & # 8221 ; although it is difficult to happen one character who portrays bias entirely, throughout the novel. When bias does happen in this novel, Jane Austen has shown it in the custodies of a notoriously proud character. Because bias is non personified ( Internet Explorer. depicted as a major characteristic defect ) I believe that it was non to be the object of Jane Austen? s sharper unfavorable judgment.

Jane Austen has depicted pride in her child ( functional ) characters as a agency of showing it? s importance as a subject of this novel. Lady Catherine is one of the chief wrongdoers, her poses, haughtiness and pride are fuelled by other characters like Mr Collins who is put at that place to satire proud people and their followings. Another of import character to observe is Mr Darcy. He is an highly of import character in this novel, a major character, and I think that the fact that he was perceived to hold been? proud? at the beginning of the novel by the reader, Elizabeth, and the community of the shire, and our perceptual experience, along with Elizabeth, of his character, has changed throughout the fresh points to Jane Austen? s unfavorable judgment of pride and snobbism ( insinuating that one time pride is done off with ( and along with it, bias ) a character becomes much more favorable. ( Note that Lady Catherine does non rock from her proud chesty place, from get downing to stop of the novel, this partially to supply a contrast between the supposed haughtiness of Mr Darcy at the beginning of the novel, and his behavior by the terminal. )

Throughout this novel we are shown the chesty and disdainful temperaments of the upperclass of this society. ( We are besides shown the exclusions to the regulation, viz. Mr Bingley and Miss Darcy. ) These people are extremely proud of their great lucks and estates and as a consequence of the accent at that clip on pecuniary issues, they are prejudiced ( and commit Acts of the Apostless of bias ) towards their fiscal, and societal, & # 8220 ; inferiors & # 8221 ; .

An illustration of this is the beginning of the novel, the ball, when Mr Darcy snubs Elizabeth Bennet in an

act of bias. He refuses to dance with her on history of her non being “handsome plenty to allure me.” After being described throughout the chapter as being “the proudest, most disagreeable adult male in the world” because he would non socialize ( ”he danced merely one time with Mrs Hurst and one time with Miss Bingley, declined being introduced to any other lady, and spent the remainder of the eventide walking about the room, talking on occasion to one of his ain party” ) his refusal to dance with Elizabeth Bennet is consistent with the remainder of his snobbism and it is logical that he is cold-shouldering Elizabeth Bennet because he is overly proud and does non experience that her good looks is worthy of his.

Another illustration of proud character put to deathing bias on an & # 8220 ; inferior & # 8221 ; campaigner is Miss Bingley and Mr Darcy? s confederacy against Mr Bingley and Miss Bennet? s wooing and inevitable matrimony. Together, Mr Darcy and Miss Bingley make up one’s mind that Mr Bingley and Jane are non suited and hence should non be married because Jane? s background is non worthy of Mr Bingley? s rich, socially fine-looking estate. First, Mr. Darcy influences Bingley to go forth Netherfield, so Miss Bingley & # 8220 ; fails & # 8221 ; to state him of Jane? s prescence in London ( although she knows that it would be of great involvement to him. ) It is because of their pride, and their warp perceptual experience of their ain, and in this instance their brother or friend? s pride, that influences to believe they would be & # 8220 ; making the right thing & # 8221 ; by maintaining Jane and Mr. Bingley apart.

Lady Catherine? s bullyin of Elizabeth ( at the terminal of the novel ) in an attempt to deter her from get marrieding Darcy is a consequence of her feeling that her ain girl was entitled to Mr. Darcy more than Elizabeth ( who was non deserving every bit much socially or in pecuniary value. ) She argues & # 8220 ; are the sunglassess of Pemberley to be therefore polluted? & # 8221 ; This is an act of utmost haughtiness stemming from her bias against Elizabeth. Lady Catherine, as a consequence of her pride, believes she is more of import than everyone and that everyone else should esteem and honor them ( in this instance Elizabeth ) by rejecting a proposal from a adult male who she loves and who loves her. This obscene premise on Lady Catherine? s behalf is as a consequence of her bias towards the Bennets because of their lower income, and societal position. The bias against them for such a ground is rooted in her ain chesty pride.

In the instance of the features pride and bias ( two key subjects of the novel ) I think that pride comes in for the sharper unfavorable judgment by Jane Austen. I think this because of her personification of pride ( in characters like Lady Catherine ) and the fact that the bias which does happen in the novel is accompanied by, if non rooted in pride. Through the incidents spoken on above, bias has been shown to be a consequence of chesty pride and because it is an underlying emotive in the prejudiced actions of the characters I feel it is more aggressively criticised.