Do most companies have an duty to make and implement a codification of moralss? Explain why or why non. What are some specific codification of moralss mentioned in the text and readings? Most companies are non obligated to make and implement a codification of moralss but it is in the best involvement of the company that they do. Companies are non obligated merely because it is up to them how they enforce regulations of the company. Harmonizing to the text “Most professional organisations have detailed codifications of behavior that specify the duties members are expected to honor” ( Ruggiero. 2008. p. 98 ) . ”

If enforced the codification of moralss provided will assist employees understand what is right and what is incorrect when it comes to other employees and clients. In the text some specific codification of moralss are “A physician shall ever bear in head the duty of continuing Human life. ( World Medical Association ) ” ( Ruggiero. 2008. p. 98 ) . ” And “Advertising bureaus must acknowledge an duty. non merely to their clients. but to the populace. the media they employ. and to each other.

( American Association of Advertising Agencies ) ” ( Ruggiero. 2008. p. 98 ) . ” I have non worked for a company that does non hold a codification of ethic. Sometimes a company has to alter its codification of moralss to set to its turning concern. The codification of moralss of a company is something and employee can mention to when they have inquiry about how they should move in a certain state of affairs. I can non retrieve which category but in one of my categories I remember composing a codification of moralss for a make-believe company and I enjoyed making it.

Mention

Ruggiero. V. R. ( 2008 ) . Thinking critically approximately ethical issues ( 7th Ed. ) . Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.