, Research Paper
“ The tragic? bolide
in the dark? imagined by Jefferson had eventually rung. The
Missouri Compromise had failed. Proslavery and
antislavery civilians clashed in the streets and took up weaponries.
Thousands of Northerners were willing to decease for their
beliefs. The Civil War had begun. The provinces were at war
with each other. ” This dividing conflict between the North
and the South was ineluctable. The Civil War was caused
by economic, political and moral jobs. It all started by
an alarming addition in a demand for cotton, which triggered
the edifice of a barrier between two districts in a
turning state. New Machinery was altering the fabric
industry in New England and Britain. These Millss needed
more and more cotton, making a new demand in the South.
For this trade with Europe, after 1812, natural cotton
accounted for one-third all cotton exports of the United
States. By 1830, it increased to half. Cotton rapidly
became a large money-making hard currency harvest for the South and
North economic system likewise. But the demand besides revived the
demand for slaves. The plantations had to be worked, and
inkinesss were a inexpensive, efficient manner to acquire the cotton
picked. To do their occupations easier, Eli Whitney took
advantage of the new thought, and invented the cotton
gin ( short for engine ) . It quickly cleaned the seeds from the
short, gluey fibres of highland cotton, the assortment that grew
all over the South. The procedure was simple: a roller carried
natural cotton along wooden splines. Sharp metal dentitions push
through the splines and rapidly pulled the fibres from the
seeds. In 1794, he obtained a patent. Whitney still earned
little because it was simple plenty for makers to
transcript. Even though the machine made achieving cotton
faster, slaves were still pushed to work harder and bring forth
more. Blacks under imprisonment surely led a harsh, unjust
life. But that is where the white Southerners believed inkinesss
belonged. Northerners knew better. Harriet
Beecher-Stowe, a female, black emancipationist was cognizant of
these conditions. She wrote Uncle Tom? s Cabin, which
was published in 1852, and described the unbelievable inhuman treatment
and horrors of bondage. Stowe wanted to “ compose something
that would do the whole state experience what an accurst
thing bondage is. ” Her novel became widely popular, and
within a twelvemonth, readers had bought 300,000 transcripts.
Wherever it went, it carried it? s powerful message of the
immoralities of bondage. She hoped the novel would convey a
peaceable terminal to bondage, but alternatively it seemed to convey the
state closer to war. Of class, non all Southerners
supported bondage, nor did all Northerners oppose it. Yet
antislavery feelings were on the rise in the North? few
white Southerners went to extremes. Their concern ballad in
keeping the plantation system as it existed. With her
book she was able to derive many Northerners support in the
antislavery race, yet at the same clip she outraged the
Southerners. Harriet? s novel was one of the many things
that sparred misgiving between the North and South. The
North didn? t trust the South bec
ause they refused to assist
Southern plantation proprietors capture slaves. North
depended on the South for doing money, and the South
depended on the slaves to pick their cotton. This created
the Northern fright of Competition. The North was afraid
that South would derive power of harvests and set them out of
concern. This meant that bondage would duplicate. The North
was torn between giving the slaves their rightful picks, or
maintaining the economic system balanced. It was a affair of moral
criterions. The South wanted to interrupt away from the
brotherhood, while the North still wanted the two districts to
stick together. This struggle was the chief cause of the Civil
War. The South argued about their province? s rights. They said
a province could invalidate a federal jurisprudence it did non see
constitutional. Southern provinces based their right to go forth the
brotherhood, on the fact the original 13 provinces had existed
individually before they formed together for the United
States. The South could interrupt their commitment to the brotherhood
because they were non portion of the original U.S. If they
could organize at that place ain Confederacy, the South could
go on the usage of slaves while besides maintaining their reign on
the cotton industry. The political issues that caused the Civil
War, revolved around affairs that involved territorial
topics and slavery Acts of the Apostless. In 1820, the Missouri
Compromise was worked out and gained congressional
blessing. Missouri was to be admitted as a slave province, and
Maine would come in the brotherhood as a free province. The
via media besides prohibited bondage in other American
districts west of the Mississippi river and North of
Missouri? s southern boundary. Stephen A. Douglas
introduced a measure called the Kansas-Nebraska Act. It
proposed to split the country into two districts: that of
Kansas and that of Nebraska. It was implied that Kansas
would go a slave province, and Nebraska would be free
of bondage. Popular sovereignty was besides put into consequence.
This act gave the electors, in each district, the right to
decide whether to go a free province or a slave province.
Together, they rendered the Missouri Compromise
meaningless. As the South? s dependance on bondage
increased between 1790 and 1860, the spread between the
Southern cotton economic system and industrial economic system of the
North widened. The opposing ends and demands of the
North and South created a deeper conflict- a struggle that
finally lead to war. Basically, the North fought to maintain
the brotherhood together, and give black slaves freedom, while the
South fought for their life style, places, and to maintain things
together economically. The Northerners had high moral
issues while the Southerners wanted to maintain their
plantations and cotton production. They weren? T willing to
give up at that place slaves. There were excessively many struggles
between the two districts, so they fought to decide them.
John Brown, a vindictive emancipationist put it best, “ the offenses
of this guilty land will ne’er be purged off, but with
blood ” . The north won the war, and ties were broken. The
barrier they had started to construct so long ago eventually
crumbled.