The Causes Of The Civil War Essay

Free Articles

, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

“ The tragic? bolide

in the dark? imagined by Jefferson had eventually rung. The

Missouri Compromise had failed. Proslavery and

antislavery civilians clashed in the streets and took up weaponries.

Thousands of Northerners were willing to decease for their

beliefs. The Civil War had begun. The provinces were at war

with each other. ” This dividing conflict between the North

and the South was ineluctable. The Civil War was caused

by economic, political and moral jobs. It all started by

an alarming addition in a demand for cotton, which triggered

the edifice of a barrier between two districts in a

turning state. New Machinery was altering the fabric

industry in New England and Britain. These Millss needed

more and more cotton, making a new demand in the South.

For this trade with Europe, after 1812, natural cotton

accounted for one-third all cotton exports of the United

States. By 1830, it increased to half. Cotton rapidly

became a large money-making hard currency harvest for the South and

North economic system likewise. But the demand besides revived the

demand for slaves. The plantations had to be worked, and

inkinesss were a inexpensive, efficient manner to acquire the cotton

picked. To do their occupations easier, Eli Whitney took

advantage of the new thought, and invented the cotton

gin ( short for engine ) . It quickly cleaned the seeds from the

short, gluey fibres of highland cotton, the assortment that grew

all over the South. The procedure was simple: a roller carried

natural cotton along wooden splines. Sharp metal dentitions push

through the splines and rapidly pulled the fibres from the

seeds. In 1794, he obtained a patent. Whitney still earned

little because it was simple plenty for makers to

transcript. Even though the machine made achieving cotton

faster, slaves were still pushed to work harder and bring forth

more. Blacks under imprisonment surely led a harsh, unjust

life. But that is where the white Southerners believed inkinesss

belonged. Northerners knew better. Harriet

Beecher-Stowe, a female, black emancipationist was cognizant of

these conditions. She wrote Uncle Tom? s Cabin, which

was published in 1852, and described the unbelievable inhuman treatment

and horrors of bondage. Stowe wanted to “ compose something

that would do the whole state experience what an accurst

thing bondage is. ” Her novel became widely popular, and

within a twelvemonth, readers had bought 300,000 transcripts.

Wherever it went, it carried it? s powerful message of the

immoralities of bondage. She hoped the novel would convey a

peaceable terminal to bondage, but alternatively it seemed to convey the

state closer to war. Of class, non all Southerners

supported bondage, nor did all Northerners oppose it. Yet

antislavery feelings were on the rise in the North? few

white Southerners went to extremes. Their concern ballad in

keeping the plantation system as it existed. With her

book she was able to derive many Northerners support in the

antislavery race, yet at the same clip she outraged the

Southerners. Harriet? s novel was one of the many things

that sparred misgiving between the North and South. The

North didn? t trust the South bec

ause they refused to assist

Southern plantation proprietors capture slaves. North

depended on the South for doing money, and the South

depended on the slaves to pick their cotton. This created

the Northern fright of Competition. The North was afraid

that South would derive power of harvests and set them out of

concern. This meant that bondage would duplicate. The North

was torn between giving the slaves their rightful picks, or

maintaining the economic system balanced. It was a affair of moral

criterions. The South wanted to interrupt away from the

brotherhood, while the North still wanted the two districts to

stick together. This struggle was the chief cause of the Civil

War. The South argued about their province? s rights. They said

a province could invalidate a federal jurisprudence it did non see

constitutional. Southern provinces based their right to go forth the

brotherhood, on the fact the original 13 provinces had existed

individually before they formed together for the United

States. The South could interrupt their commitment to the brotherhood

because they were non portion of the original U.S. If they

could organize at that place ain Confederacy, the South could

go on the usage of slaves while besides maintaining their reign on

the cotton industry. The political issues that caused the Civil

War, revolved around affairs that involved territorial

topics and slavery Acts of the Apostless. In 1820, the Missouri

Compromise was worked out and gained congressional

blessing. Missouri was to be admitted as a slave province, and

Maine would come in the brotherhood as a free province. The

via media besides prohibited bondage in other American

districts west of the Mississippi river and North of

Missouri? s southern boundary. Stephen A. Douglas

introduced a measure called the Kansas-Nebraska Act. It

proposed to split the country into two districts: that of

Kansas and that of Nebraska. It was implied that Kansas

would go a slave province, and Nebraska would be free

of bondage. Popular sovereignty was besides put into consequence.

This act gave the electors, in each district, the right to

decide whether to go a free province or a slave province.

Together, they rendered the Missouri Compromise

meaningless. As the South? s dependance on bondage

increased between 1790 and 1860, the spread between the

Southern cotton economic system and industrial economic system of the

North widened. The opposing ends and demands of the

North and South created a deeper conflict- a struggle that

finally lead to war. Basically, the North fought to maintain

the brotherhood together, and give black slaves freedom, while the

South fought for their life style, places, and to maintain things

together economically. The Northerners had high moral

issues while the Southerners wanted to maintain their

plantations and cotton production. They weren? T willing to

give up at that place slaves. There were excessively many struggles

between the two districts, so they fought to decide them.

John Brown, a vindictive emancipationist put it best, “ the offenses

of this guilty land will ne’er be purged off, but with

blood ” . The north won the war, and ties were broken. The

barrier they had started to construct so long ago eventually

crumbled.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out