Essay, Research Paper
The Friar, in relation to his narrative, possesses characteristicssimilar to the content of his history which he produces during apilgrimage to Canterbury. As a adult male of the church, the Friar maltreatments hispower by trying to gain from the wickednesss of others. The duty ofthe Friar is to set into action the words of Christ ; nevertheless, bymisusing the authorization granted to him, the Friar reveals his hypocrisy.A all right illustration of this adult male s pretence of virtuousness is concerned withchastity and gender. The Friar, nevertheless, does non completelydisregard his moral values. This member of spiritual order divulges thework of Christ by reding penitence in order to avoid damnation inHell.The Friar, besides known as Hubert, had a particular licence from thePope, but decided to take a way of corruptness and greed. Theresponsibility of the Friar was to implore for money, or to raise financess forhis community within a specific geographical country ( Hallissy 137 ) , andlisten to the confessions of evildoers. The Friar does achieve his responsibility ofaccumulating money, but by happening and working commercialopportunities ( Bloom 113 ) . On the expedition to Canterbury with hisfellow pilgrims, the Friar narrates a narrative refering a certainsummoner. The undertaking of summoners is to convene evildoers for a test in thepresence of church leaders. In The Friar s Tale the summoner mistreatshis authorization. The Friar considers the summoner as a unreliable stealer who knew so much of graft and black mail and drew big net incomes tohimself thereby. In The Friar s Tale the summoner quoted, Withoutextortion, how can I do a life. This is a worthy illustration of thepower that the summoner maltreatments. Without the purpose of associating himselfwith the summoner in his narrative, the Friar reflects similar traits thatthe summoner possesses. The Summoner abuses the privileges of hisoffice for his ain net income. But so does his critic the Friar ( Hallissy138 ) . Friar Hubert makes great attempts of lead oning evildoers. Strayingaway from his true duty, the Friar accrues money from evildoers inorder to derive a personal net income. Chaucer wrote, For many a chap is sohard at bosom he can non cry, for all his inward smart therefore insteadof crying and of supplication, One should give Ag for a hapless mendicant panic. The Friar s maltreatment of power illustrates the characteristic ofhypocrisy which he possesses. Alternatively of roll uping money for his order, the Friar misleads those who have committed wickedness by arousing them tooffer money. Chaucer describes this friar as the finest mendicant ofhis batch. The Friar was so a all right mendicant, but non for theappropriate aim. Chaucer quotes in depicting this fraud, Anywhere a net income might accrue, gracious he was and lowly of servicetoo. This adult male of spiritual order was a echt dissembler. The Friarnarrates a narrative about a summoner, who is besides a dissembler. Extortingmoney from evildoers is non included in the summoner s undertaking. Summoners aresupposed to cite alleged sinners to those tribunals ( Hallissy 138 ) .For illustration, in The Friar s Tale the summoner accuses a widow ofperforming sexual Acts of the Apostless with a mendicant or priest. This officer of thechurch demands money from this hapless, old doll. If she refuses, the widowrisks opportunities of exclusion. Enraged with such accusal, the oldlady curses the summoner to hell. In this scenario the summoner receiveshis proper penalty as a consequence from his ain greed. In comparing tohis tale the Friar neglects his office seting the money he extortedfrom evildoers into his ain pocket. The two of them are both hypocritesbecause both are adept at cajoling money, and are merely out for whatthey can acquire ( Cooper 131 ) . Avoiding the hapless and cultivating therich ( Bloom 113 ) , the Friar truly marks himself as a fraud, and as a
hypocrite.The Friar, an reliable dissembler, ignores his vows
of chastityand seeks for the satisfaction with other adult females. Contrary to the actualpractice of a holy adult male, the Friar possesses a fancy for middle-classestablishments, agreeable adult females and smooth talk ( Cooper 131 ) . Friars, asa clerical order, hold vows of poorness and humbleness, every bit good as thevows of celibacy and obeisance ( Bloom 113 ) However Friar Hubert exposeshimself to adult females. Chauser wrote depicting the Friar, Highly andintimate was he with Country Folk within his boundary, and metropolis dolls ofhonour and ownerships. In The Friar s Tale the summoner breaks hisvows of celibacy by associating with other adult females. Summoners hold a positionin the church and are required to stay focussed on their responsibility. On thecontrary the summoner in The Friar s Tale overlooks this undeniablepledge. The Friar speaks about a hypocritical summoner who takespleasure from the presence of adult females. The Friar stated, He was a stealer, a summoner, a procurer. The Friar s summoner had a web ofacquaintances among mediaeval low-lives, prostitute ( procurers ) and dames ( Hallissy 139 ) . Without the aim of associating himself withthe summoner in his narrative, the Friar likewise broke his vows ofchastity. Chaucer wrote, He d fixed up many a matrimony, giving each ofhis immature adult females what he could afford her. The breakage of his chastityvows demonstrates the important character which the Friar possesses.Although he deceives evildoers in order to have a personal gainand breaks the vows of humbleness and celibacy, the Friar is non perfectly an immoral person. The Friar preaches about penitence inhis narrative. In The Friar s Tale the summoner collaborates with the Devilin deceiving people. Despite the cognition of the individuality of hispartner, the summoner continues to tie in with the Devil. Thesummoner stated, Though you are Satan s ego, the really Devil! I keep myword of honor to a brother, as I have sworn, and so shall each toother. An statement takes topographic point in the state of affairs where the summonerconfronts an old widow. The guiltless lady curses the summoner to Hell.The Devil all of a sudden shows his presence to the two persons and willingto take the psyche of the summoner unless penitence was offered. Thesummoner refused and as a consequence, he was damned in Hell, wheresummoners have their particular shelf. Since the summoner refused torepent, his life on Earth ceased. The Friar urges others to atone fortheir wickednesss in order to be saved from Hell. In The Friar s Tale thesummoner did non repent ; therefore he damned himself ( Hallissy 144 ) .The Friar does stay faithful to Christ by promoting others torepent. This action makes the Friar a moral person in a particularmanner, despite his actions of fraud and deficiency of humbleness. Damnation is non God s will for His animals. The Friar reminds the audience that the strivings of this curst house of snake pit can be avoided by supplication and turning away of enticement. The Friar, inadequate of God s grace though he is, ends his narrative with sound religious advice to the audience ( Hallissy144 ) .In decision, the Friar, a adult male keeping a peculiar office in thechurch, portions several similarities with the character of the summonerin his narrative. Authorized to hear the confessions of evildoers and to raisemoney for his order, the Friar abuses his power by misdirecting others.This action goes against the true duty of mendicants. As a consequence ofhis misrepresentations, the Friar is considered to be a dissembler. He haspledged his committedness to the mission of Christ, but has misused hisauthority in order to acquire a personal benefit. The Friar besides pledged tochastity ; alternatively of carry throughing his vows of celibacy, he exposes himselfwith cocottes for pleasance and self satisfaction. However the Friardoes rede those who have sinned to atone. This moral suggestionpresented by the Friar reveals some kind of righteousness within him.