The Kennedy Assassination: What The Warren Report Did Not Tell America Essay, Research Paper

Matt Bogue

November 24, 1998

The Kennedy Assassination: What the Warren Report Did Not Tell America

On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was going along a preset motorcade path in Dallas, Texas when he was fatally changeable, having lesions to the thorax, back, and caput. Shortly after the blackwash, Dallas police arrested former U.S. Marine Corps Private Lee Harvey Oswald. On November 24 of the same twelvemonth, Jack Ruby, proprietor of a Dallas cabaret, shooting Oswald. Less than a twelvemonth after the two slayings, on September 24, 1964, the Warren Commission, headed by Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren, released a study saying their finding of fact that Lee Harvey Oswald killed President John F. Kennedy & # 8220 ; entirely and without advice or aid & # 8221 ; ( Encarta ) . Now, 35 old ages after the blackwash, many Americans still believe the committee & # 8217 ; s claim that Lee Harvey Oswald was the exclusive bravo of President Kennedy. However, all grounds points toward the more awful world that the United States authorities might hold been involved in a confederacy to kill the president and an resulting cover-up. Therefore, the inquiry still remains: Who truly killed J.F.K. ? The twenty-four hours of President Kennedy & # 8217 ; s blackwash, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn into the office of president while winging back to Washington on Air Force One. Seven yearss subsequently, Johnson appointed a committee of seven members,

headed by Earl Warren, to look into the blackwash. After oppugning 552 informants, the Warren Commission released their 296,000-word study on September 24, 1964 ( Encarta ) .

The Warren Report stated that Lee Harvey Oswald fired all three of the shootings that killed President Kennedy from the Texas School Book Depository. This decision was accepted by the state as proved fact until educated inquiries began to originate and the public became cognizant of a possible confederacy. Could the Warren Report have been incorrect? One of the many eyewitnesses that the committee leaned on to a great extent could non even pick Oswald out of a group of suspects. This was dry because it was the same informant who purportedly saw Oswald really shoot President Kennedy. Another piece of grounds that contradicted the Warren Report was a paraffin trial taken of Oswald & # 8217 ; s right cheek. This trial was used to state if he could hold perchance fired the rifle. It was non until after the trial came out negative that the committee called it undependable ( O & # 8217 ; Toole 7 ) . In a 1970 CBS-TV interview, President Lyndon B. Johnson stated that he doubted the committee & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; individual bravo & # 8221 ; theory. Before the interview was aired, he asked for that portion to be deleted and withheld from the populace for the interest of & # 8220 ; national security. & # 8221 ; Johnson besides added in a 1971 interview with Leo Janos, & # 8220 ; I ne’er believed that Oswald acted entirely, although I can accept that he pulled the trigger. . . .we had been runing a. . .Murder Inc. in the Caribbean & # 8221 ; ( O & # 8217 ; Toole 8 ) . These testimonies are non all of the grounds bespeaking that Oswald was non the lone bravo. Jesse Curry, head of the Dallas Police Department at the clip of the slaying, adds:

I don & # 8217 ; Ts have a strong feeling that there was person at that place [ the grassy mound at Dealey Plaza ] , but, on the other manus, it wouldn & # 8217 ; t surprise me at some point in history, that cogent evidence will demo that there was person up at that place. ( O & # 8217 ; Toole 7 )

Georgia & # 8217 ; s Senator Richard Russell stated in January of 1970 that he had ne’er believed that Oswald acted entirely because there was excessively much grounds against that claim. His sentiment is important because he was portion of the Warren Commission. He had purportedly attempted to carry Warren to add his sentiment to the study but Warren insisted on a & # 8220 ; consentaneous study & # 8221 ; ( O & # 8217 ; Toole 8 ) .

In add-on to the extended grounds that lay to rest the claim that Oswald was the lone bravo, there exists grounds that implies that he had nil to make with Kennedy & # 8217 ; s blackwash. The eventide of the slaying, Oswa

ld denied killing President Kennedy. George O’Toole subsequently processed these denials on the Psychological Stress Evaluator ( PSE ) , which is more normally called the “lie detector.” Oswald’s statement that he did non kill the president showed about no emphasis at all. When proving on the PSE, emphasis is a necessary portion of prevarication, but can be caused by another distraction. This information put together leads one to believe that Oswald was stating the truth when he denied hiting President Kennedy. However, because of the simpleness of this find, O’Toole doubted the unity of the PSE. To acquire rid of this uncertainty, he ran another transcript of the same quotation mark made by Oswald through the PSE. This transcript was taken by a different mike, but revealed indistinguishable emphasis to the first transcript, therefore

bespeaking that Lee Harvey Oswald must hold been stating the truth ( O & # 8217 ; Toole 125 ) . Another beginning of grounds that Oswald was guiltless involved the alleged slaying arm and his ability to fire the rifle. In an experiment done by Howard Roffman, Oswald would hold had to be a better shooting than twelve out of 15 adept FBI riflemen in order to fire all three shootings in the allotted clip period. This effort seems impossible given the fact that Oswald was considered a & # 8220 ; hapless shooting & # 8221 ; when he left the Mariness. This grounds is even more arresting sing the slaying arm was the poor-shooting Manlicher-Carcano 6.5 millimeter Italian rifle ( Roffman 54-55, 70 ) . If Oswald did, in fact, kill Kennedy, so why did he utilize such a crude and poor-shooting arm when he was non needfully an first-class shooting himself? The truth is that Lee Harvey Oswald was non a good plenty rifleman to hit President Kennedy from the Texas School Book Depository on November 22, 1963.

If Oswald did non kill Kennedy, so who did? The reply to that inquiry is yet to be found, but, every bit terrorization as it may look, it might lie within the United States authorities. John Edgar Hoover, manager of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) at the clip of the blackwash, purportedly had learned by September of 1962 that the Marcello organisation of the Mafia in New Orleans was be aftering to kill President Kennedy. Against his constitutional responsibility, Hoover concealed the cognition of Carlos Marcello & # 8217 ; s programs from the secret service, measure uping him for the offense of lese majesty ( North

47-48 ) . As a portion of Marcello & # 8217 ; s & # 8220 ; contract, & # 8221 ; an aggressive double Oswald appeared in Dallas a month before the shot to border the existent Oswald ( North 195 ) . After the

blackwash, Hoover took drastic stairss to keep back the information of the & # 8220 ; contract & # 8221 ; from the authorities and research workers ( North 47-48 ) .

All of this grounds does non reply the inquiry of who killed President John F. Kennedy, but it does give a strong resistance to the Warren Report. For many old ages the state has believed the findings of the Warren Commission to be true. However, the fact is that they are non true. There is merely excessively must grounds that contradicts the study. For illustration, Abraham Zapruder caught on video the full sequence of shootings ( Lifton 19 ) . This picture was merely hardly touched on in the study. America may ne’er cognize who truly killed President John F. Kennedy, but there is person out at that place who does, and until they come frontward, the state is forced to believe the prevarications and misrepresentation given by the first authorities bureau to look into the blackwash, the Warren Commission.

60e

& # 8220 ; Warren Report. & # 8221 ; Encarta. Microsoft Corporation, 1998.

Lifton, David S. Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. New York: Macmillan, 1980.

North, Mark. Act of Treason: The Role of J. Edgar Hoover in the Assassination of President Kennedy. New York: Carol & A ; Graf, 1991.

O & # 8217 ; Toole, George. The Assassination Tapes: An Electronic Probe into the Murder of John F. Kennedy and the Dallas Coverup. New York: Penthouse Press, 1975.

Roffman, Howard. Presumed Guilty: Lee Harvey Oswald in the Assassination President Kennedy. London: Associated U P, 1975.