The Leadership Styles Essay Sample

Free Articles

Without leading everyone would be working as persons and many activities would be impossible. A leader bands people together to finish a common end. In the Merriam Webster dictionary the word leading is defined as: “1 ) the office or place of a leader. 2 ) capacity to take. 3 ) the act or an case of leading” . The manners of leading that other manners are based off of are the autocratic. democratic. and laissez-faire. The first manner of leading is called the autocratic manner. The features of this leading manner are when an person controls all the determinations with small or no input from the group. This type of leader is like a dictator in that he dictates all the determinations by the group and seldom trusts input from the group. This manner is normally used when there is a strong leader. a speedy determination is needed. a definite clip bound. and there is a nerve-racking state of affairs such as a military struggle. Members of the group might prefer this manner because it allows the group to concentrate on the undertaking and non on how to make the undertaking.

Although this manner of leading may be utile at times there are several ruins to this manner. Since leaders who use this manner do non confer with at that place group on determinations they may be viewed as a dictator or as autocratic. doing the group to dislike the leader which so hurts the overall public presentation of the group. While the autocratic manner has several ruins. leaders can utilize this manner sagely. The best clip to utilize this manner is when the leader is the most knowing member of the group or is the lone member that knows how to acquire more information on the state of affairs. An illustration of when to utilize this manner is in a combat state of affairs when the combatant leader knows best. Using this manner could be black when used at the incorrect clip and with the incorrect obstructions. The incorrect clip to utilize this manner would be a state of affairs such as mending a vehicle or explosive devise in which the leader has no experience and the lineman or machinist is qualified.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The 2nd manner of leading is called the democratic manner. This manner is sometimes called the most effectual manner of leading. Democratic leading is described as leting the group to lend thoughts. This type of leader is by and large liked more by the group since they are encouraged to portion their ideas and thoughts on the topic. This helps the leader when seeking to come with originative thoughts to work out jobs. Since the members of the group are included more they are more likely to care about the consequences of the undertaking. Even though this manner is by and large effectual every manner has its jobs. When the group has limited clip utilizing the democratic manner of leading can take to communication failure. doing undertakings to non be completed or to be completed falsely. Besides group members may non hold proper preparation or cognition to lend equal cognition to the concluding determination. This manner is best used when the members of the group are skilled and are willing to portion their cognition. and when there is plentifulness of clip to come up with a program on how to cover with the state of affairs. An illustration of when to utilize this manner is when a leader is seeking to assist a group through a set of obstructions in a instruction puting where the group contributes thoughts.

The incorrect clip to utilize this manner would be when a determination needs to be made rapidly and the leader is non adequately trained. The concluding manner of leading is called the individualistic manner. Individualistic leading lets members of the group make their ain determinations. With this manner the leaders are hands-off and allows the group to do the determinations. This manner is used when all of the members are trained exhaustively and can work on their ain. Although the definition of individualistic implies that leaders are non present during the activity. leaders are frequently around if the members need advice. Even though this manner can be really utile it can harmful to the undertaking if the members do non hold proper preparation and are non dedicated to the terminal consequence of the undertaking. An illustration of when to utilize this manner is when a leader is non needed for a specific undertaking such as cleaning the barracks. The leader is able to state the group to make a undertaking and swear them to make it without necessitating to oversee them. This manner should non be used when group members lack the cognition to finish the undertaking. they get side tracked easy. and do non put their ain deadlines for the undertaking.

Leadership allows for many challenges to be accomplished by teamwork. A leader finds the best solution to a job and drives the squad toward the success of the mission. By electing or holding a leader many statements can be prevented. Alternatively of reasoning amongst themselves the squad can look to the leader for replies and aid. By utilizing these manners of leading one can acquire the job solved while demoing the squad how or how non to work out it.

Mentions:

Cherry. Kendra. “What Is Autocratic Leadership? ” about. com Guide

Cherry. Kendra. “What Is Democratic Leadership? ” about. com Guide

Cherry. Kendra. “What Is Individualistic Leadership? ” about. com

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. merriam-webster. com/dictionary/leadership

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out