Mary Reilly and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are really similar. Mary Reilly is based off the book so it shouldn’t surprise anyone how similar they are. There are merely a few differences between the two but I think those differences make the film better. One difference is the manner the two are told. In the film it is told through following Mary Reilly. one of the amahs. In the book it follows many different people to explicate what is truly go oning but besides through a attorney named Mr. Utterson. I think they changed this so it would do it more into a love narrative but still maintaining it a enigma which would do people more intrigued to see what happens. This makes it less deadening alternatively of merely holding a enigma traveling on.
You besides. acquire more affiliated to a character like Mary Reilly if it follows person more closely instead than a group. In the film Mary Reilly is the 1 who sees Mr. Hyde turn into Dr. Jekyll for the last clip because Mr. Hyde poisons them. while in the book Dr. Lanyon is the lone individual other than themselves to see Mr. Hyde alter into Dr. Jekyll. I think they changed this because in the film it merely adds to the love narrative and the horror of holding to watch them alter right before Dr. Jekyll’s lovers eyes. Another major alteration between the book and the film is the linguistic communication of them. The film is much easier to understand non merely because it gives you a ocular of what’s traveling on but it besides is worded much easier than the older novel.
Most people can really understand a batch better what is traveling on in the film since they know what all the words mean unlike in the book where it can utilize words that are difficult to understand for an mean reader. I think this helps do the film more interesting and more entertaining to watch excessively. Some things the book and the film Mary Reilly have in common are that Mr. Hyde is presented as an evil individual in both and Dr. Jekyll as good or normal. Mr. Hyde is described as being average and people were fearful of him in both the book and the film. He is wanted for slayings in both and he’s happy to hold done them.
In the film he makes Mary Reilly. the amah. be scarred for life by watching the atrocious passage from Mr. Hyde to Dr. Jekyll. Besides. since the potion was poisoned Mary Reilly watched Dr. Jekyll dice right in forepart of her who she genuinely adored. Dr. Jekyll is described and shown as a nice sure adult male in both the book and the film. Mary Reilly starts to truly love him in the film while he is merely a friend of Mr. Uttersons in the book. Since Mary Reilly is his amah in the film and he likes her you get a better item of him and the manner he used to move before he started transitioning to Mr. Hyde one time in a piece.
This helps make a better visual of how Mr. Jekyll used to be alternatively of in the book where Mr. Utterson and Dr. Lanyon depict how he used to be to you alternatively. Mr. Poole is in both the film and the book as Dr. Jekylls chief pantryman. He is described/shown as a really loyal individual in both and wants everything to be right for Mr. Jekyll. He besides. does non like Mr. Hyde in both. A difference between the book and the film is that in the film they don’t even advert a character like Dr. Lanyon. In the book you meet Dr. Lanyon. Mr. Jekyll’s long old clip friend who besides worked with him. In the film nevertheless. this character isn’t even mentioned.
I think they did this because once they changed the narrative being told threw Mary Reilly alternatively of Mr. Utterson it made it so the Dr. Lanyon character was no longer needed. Overall I think the film was manner easier to understand. It was simpler. gave you a better visual of the characters. and had multiple plot lines like Mary Reilly’s life and Mr. Jekyll’s life. If I were to urge one of the two I would rebelliously urge the film Mary Reilly over the book The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
