The Truth Of Justice Essay, Research Paper

The Truth of Justice

Throughout the predicament of adult male, there has ever been an on-going hunt for justness. Within this journey, exists the inquiry, ? What is true justness? ? In conveying together the subjects of truth and justness, many decisions can be drawn to reply the above inquiry.

In Plato? s Apology, he is able to support his place and explicate how truth and justness go manus in manus. From the beginning, Plato makes clear to the audience that what he has to state is true and merely, ? I put my trust in the justness of what I say? ( Morgan, 6 ) . During the first portion of his defence, both truth and justness are introduced together. Plato is merely doing clear the fact that without any uncertainty, he to the full believes and trusts in the justness of his ain defence. This is of import because the base of his defence lies in stating the truth to accomplish justness.

Plato realizes that to seek justness, one must non see oneself wise. In category, we have discussed this issue and defined it as a certain type of hunt. In order to larn cognition, one must seek. If one believes he has knowledge and does non seek, there is no manner to happen justness. Plato is smart because he knows that he does non cognize. He is cognizant of the fact that he must seek and inquire inquiries in order to seek out the truth that lies within justness.

Unfortunately, this quest brings about struggle. Plato? s hunt makes others within the community nervous. They believe that the cognition they possess allows them insight above everyone else. These leaders do non to convey about new inquiries and hunts, doing their pursuit for justness false. In bend, the leaders of the community who? believe? they possess knowledge bring Forth the unfair prosecution of Plato.

As Plato continues with his address, he discusses his ain personal hunt for wisdom. He goes to three groups of people and finds different degrees of cognition within each. When Plato foremost visits the politicians he finds that they do non truly possess cognition. Their techne allows them the apprehension of how to make certain tasks the occupation requires ; yet it is a lower degree of cognition than wisdom. Plato so visits the poets and finds they have a similar background as the politicians. He states, ? because of their poesy, they thought themselves really wise work forces in other respects, which they were non? ( 9 ) . The poets believe they have wisdom ; therefore they do non seek for the truth. Finally, he goes to the craftsmen and is startled to happen that they knew things he did non, hence doing the craftsmen wiser than he. Plato? s find of the truth scared the people who were said to possess alleged wisdom.

It is unfortunate that the find of truth frightens persons into unfair actions, such as the prosecution of Plato. In the pursuit for justness, truth must be discovered. Plato was able to detect the truth, yet it appears as though the truth put an terminal to his life. Yet one must recognize that justness within the metropolis is non a pure signifier of justness. Plato becomes the victim of a great act of unfairness.

The people of the metropolis do non reprobate Plato for seeking the truth. Rather, they accuse him of perverting the young person. Therefore, the people prosecuting Plato make it look as though they excessively are interesting in seeking the truth. Plato sees through this prevarication and provinces, ? It would be a really happy province of personal businesss if merely one individual corrupted our young person, while others improved them? ( 11 ) . This statement proves that the metropolis is concealing the truth from its young person. In the pursuit for justness, one can non cover up or conceal the truth. Many members of the metropolis do this, and do the metropolis an unfair topographic point to populate.

During his address, Plato discusses the subject of decease. This is cagey because the treatment of decease is relevant to his address and besides to the hunt for truth. Plato himself is faced with the possibility of his ain decease and provinces, ? no 1 knows whether decease may non be

the greatest of all approvals for a adult male, yet work forces fear it as if they knew that it is the greatest of immoralities? ( 13 ) . Plato is uncovering a simple fact, that work forces have no wisdom sing the topic of decease. Men act as though they know what they do non. They fear decease, but for what ground? Fear comes from a deficiency of cognition. This deficiency of cognition renders the truth disused and justness unattainable.

Plato so begins to talk straight about the truth and how it will take him and the metropolis towards justness. He does non desire the metropolis to be angry with him for talking the truth. He is seeking justness for the metropolis and for himself. He admits that what he is accused of holding done, others could hold seen as unfair. Sing the accusal of perverting the young person, Plato makes the point that, ? If I corrupt some immature work forces, so certainly some of them who have grown older and realized that I gave them bad advice when they were immature should now themselves come up here to impeach me and revenge themselves? ( 16 ) . No 1 is present to endorse this accusal. Plato is utilizing the truth to seek out his ain personal justness.

Plato? s response to his sentence to decease is honorable and true. He knows that justness did non neglect him, instead the deficiency of wisdom demonstrated by others failed him. Plato provinces, ? I leave you now, condemned to decease by you, but they are condemned by truth to wickedness and injustice? ( 19 ) . When the truth is revealed, these work forces will be faced with unfairness, merely as he was. He continues, ? You are incorrect to believe that by killing people you will forestall anyone from upbraiding you for non populating the right manner? ( 19 ) . Plato is stating the Judgess who have sentenced him to decease that their heads will non be free. They are no closer to justness than when the test had started. They are farther from the truth that is found within justness. A great unfairness has taken topographic point because of the common inability to understand and esteem the truth when it is spoken.

Last, Plato returns to the inevitable subject of decease. Men believe to be educated about decease, when truly they are non. Plato puts one last idea in the heads of his executors, ? there is good hope that decease is a approval. . . ? he continues, ? for it is one of two things: either the dead are nil and have no perceptual experience of anything, or it is, as we are told, a alteration for the psyche from here to another topographic point? ( 20 ) . Plato sees himself as holding an advantage. His ain hunt for the truth within justness has brought him to decease. He has found the terminal of his journey through seeking justness.

The Judgess have sought unfairness and lost sight of the truth, hence condemning a merely adult male to decease. This is a sad world, but the truth is non ever reasonably and the pursuit for justness is non ever easily. The route towards wisdom is fogged with many prevarications and misrepresentations of world.

Plato has one concluding comment for his fellow metropolis members, ? I go to decease, and you go to populate. Which of us goes to the better batch is known to no 1, except the God? ( 20 ) . This statement is of import because Plato understands the fact that he is seeking for cognition to accomplish wisdom. He knows no better than the work forces who sentenced him to decease. He understands that in the hunt for justness, the truth must be revealed. Plato revealed the truth and was sentenced to decease. No 1 can be certain whether his decease was merely or unfair. It was his clip to travel.

In his hunt for justness, Plato found different degrees of cognition and wisdom possessed by members of the community. He did non set up himself as greater than anyone else. He sought the truth to accomplish justness and accomplished this undertaking. Men see decease as the terminal, yet what can truly be seen without wisdom? Nothing. Although Plato was killed in his pursuit for justness, no 1 has the wisdom to state that his pursuit was in vain.

Work Cited

Morgan, Michael L. , erectile dysfunction. Classicss of Moral and Political Theory. Cambridge: Hackett

Printing Company, 1996.

32f