The Wwf Effect Our Chilren Essay, Research Paper

Does Professional Wrestling Corrupt Our Young person?

Media analysts have uncovered a new perpetrator in the turning civilization of force

among American young person, professional wrestle. Long considered loutish and pretentious,

televised wrestle is now regularly full of coarseness, lewdness, and sexual insinuation.

Critics say professional wrestle reinforces sexual and cultural stereotypes and

communicates to immature people that violent, vindictive Acts of the Apostless are morally acceptable. The

lay waste toing impact of all this force affects kids, because tierce of the screening

population is kids under the age of 14.

Old ages ago professional wrestle gave up the cockamamie impression that it was merely a

featuring event. Promoters, coders and the grapplers themselves admit the lucifers

are choreographed and a victor is predetermined. Now, there are scriptwriters who write

lines for grapplers to declaim in the ring, in offstage dressing-room raillery, even in auto

pursuits. Runing narrative lines of feuds between the grapplers and their adult females followings

hold included attempted colza. Menaces of killing are common in the prematch rhetoric.

Real wrestle is secondary and participants are non so much jocks as histrions.

I feel that professional wrestle, particularly the WWF ( World Wrestling

Federation ) , corrupts the moral values of our young person and has taken a measure in the incorrect

way, particularly refering adult females. It makes philandering look glorious and

acceptable. In the past twelvemonth, the WWF has stooped to portraying force against adult females.

This force is non portrayed as adult females wrestling each other, but as work forces crushing up

adult females.

There are many sexual stereotypes happening in the universe of wrestle that

amendss the heads of kids. For illustration, the WWF has had a character called & # 8220 ; The

Godfather. & # 8221 ; His catch is, he & # 8217 ; s a procurer. He has adult females dressed like cocottes follow

him about. He calls them his & # 8220 ; Ho train & # 8221 ; ( whore train ) . If he is defeated, his opposition

purportedly takes the adult females from him for the dark. I feel that his is really detrimental to the

outlook of both male childs and misss. This teaches boys that adult females are mere sex objects and

are inferior to work forces. Because of the WWF small misss grasp the thought that their intelligence

does non count, merely their organic structure. It besides instills in their head that adult females are non equal to

work forces, but of lesser value. I believe that this type of ascertained behaviour finally amendss

the morality of kids and obscures the difference between right and incorrect.

In add-on to the womanizing that is evident in the WWF, there are besides many

sexual insinuations in mention to adult females. I watched one episode of WWF Smackdown!

on UPN and was shocked by what I saw. Val Venus, whose pealing character is that of a erotica

star, addressed the adult females in the audience: Tonight, I would wish each and every one of

you to put in the Big Valbowski s common fund. You see, it s ever up more than it s

down, and I promise you there will ne’er be an early backdown. Large Valbowski is

Venus moniker for his phallus. Try to believe of a soft manner to state your 12 twelvemonth old

girl what he intend by that. This type of insinuation degrades and discourtesies adult females.

Val Venus disrespect adult females and negotiations down to them like they are less than human. In my

eyes, this type of behaviour demonstrates to immature male childs that adult females are merely worthy

plenty to be treated as sexual objects.

Millions of kids are watching this on Television. This will do many of them to

turn up believing that this is acceptable and normal. Harmonizing to Dr. Bandura, a

behavioural psychologist, People become aggressive because they have learned by

experience, observation and/or imitation that it pays. A kid & # 8217 ; s preparedness to larn through

imitation is a assorted approval, as any female parent will state you. Children pick up unwanted

behaviour every bit rapidly as they pick up desirable activities ( 20/20 Internet ) . What kids

see, kids do. Children are like tape recording equipments. In big portion, they replay and reenact

what they & # 8217 ; ve seen and heard. When they see work forces crushing up adult females, the image is stored in

their heads, waiting to be replayed and reenacted subsequently.

The dry portion of these actions which corrupt the morality of our kids is that

the WWF blames you, the parent, for the injury that is impacting your kids. In an

USA Weekend interview, one of the most celebrated wrestle aces, & # 8220 ; The Rock, & # 8221 ; says

he has no job with childs watching his show. However, he does add this: & # 8220 ; As a

responsible parent, it & # 8217 ; s of import that you monitor what your childs are watching. At times,

our show is high-strung. At times, it & # 8217 ; s sexual. But we & # 8217 ; re G-rated compared to what you can see

on other telecasting shows. Cipher gets killed or raped on O

Ur shows. For a parent to

fault what their childs have done on me is pathetic & # 8221 ; ( USA Weekend Internet )

The job with The Rock s statement is that unfortunately parents can non

supervise what their kids are watching every minute of the twenty-four hours. Even if they could,

kids can still hold entree to such screening at a friend s house whose parents do non happen

it necessary to supervise his/her telecasting screening. The Rock s remark about the

WWF being edgy at times is a entire understatement. In fact, a yearlong survey conducted

by University of Indiana telecommunications professor Walter Gantz of 50 WWF Raw

episodes found 1,658 incidents of grapplers catching or indicating to their fork, 157

counts of an obscene manus gesture, 128 occasions of fake sexual activity, 47

incidents of demonic activity, and 20 visual aspects of a character portraying a cocotte

( 20/20 Internet ) . A small edgy?

The proprietor and manufacturer of the WWF, Vince McMahon, stated on a 20/20 study

that he is non to fault for the force that kids display. He claims himself to be a

responsible broadcaster, because his plan is given a evaluation to steer parents. From

a parent s base point, whether you choose to watch us or whether you allow your

kids to watch us, that s your determination ( 20/20 Internet )

In that same 20/20 study on the World Wrestling Federation and the societal consequence

it has on America and particularly on kids, one immature fan was even executing a patent

action of Stone Cold Steve Austin, raising the in-between finger. This kid s parents did

non learn him this action or the significance of it. Alternatively the WWF taught this kid. This

kid did non miss parental engagement, but became a merchandise of the practical world of

telecasting ( 20/20 Internet )

In an interview with INSIDE EDITION, Vince McMahon advocated that it is

non his duty to educate the young person, but alternatively he is to entertain the state. He

besides credits the skyrocketing popularity of wrestling to originative way. But

McMahon says, That s amusement it happens in every school, in every location on

the street so, in kernel we re being modern-day ( Inside Edition Internet ) .

Entertainment? Is that what you call a dramatis personae of characters masquerading as procurers,

porn stars, ghastly morticians and S & A ; M enthusiasts these yearss? This is broadcasted

during premier clip. This is the universe position that the media corporation is learning the

kids: that there is no right and incorrect, that glorification and award belong to whoever is the

most violent.

The sad portion of this contention is that kids larning coarseness from the WWF

is merely the tip of the iceberg. Last twelvemonth entirely, a 12 twelvemonth old Florida male child was charged

with slaying in the decease of a six twelvemonth old neighbour miss who was thrown into an Fe

stairway railing, a move he had seen on telecasting. A three twelvemonth old Texas male child died after

his seven twelvemonth old brother put a alleged & # 8220 ; running clothesline & # 8221 ; travel across his pharynx.

And a 12-year-old male child in the province of Washington was convicted of second-degree felony

slaying after repeatedly body-slamming his 18 month old cousin on a sofa ( 20/20

Internet ) . When did telecasting evaluations become more of import than the lives and good

being of our kids?

Unfortunately, professional wrestle is here to remain, at least for now. All of you

parents can seek to supervise your kid s telecasting screening. Watch at least one episode of

the plan your child positions so you can break understand the content and discourse it with

them. Besides, seek to explicate questionable incidents ( e.g. random force ) that occur and

discuss options to violent actions as ways to work out jobs. Ban plans that are

excessively violent or violative. Restrict telecasting sing to educational scheduling and

shows or plans which demonstrate assisting, caring and cooperation. Promote

kids to take part in more synergistic activities such as athleticss, avocations or playing with

friends. And, most of all, limit the sum of clip kids spend watching telecasting.

Hopefully, you can salvage your kids s morality from the evil clasps of professional

wrestle.

Plants Cited

Unknown Author. WWF.Com Homepage [ online ] .

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wwf.com. ( October 30, 2000 ) .

Unknown Author. ( 2000 ) . Does professional wrestle impact our kids?

[ online ] . Available: www.insideedition.com. ( October 30, 2000 ) .

Unknown Author. ( 2000 ) . Should You Let Them Watch? [ online ]

Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_001020_violence

_feature.html ( October 21, 2000 ) .

Unknown Author. ( 2000 ) . The Minds of Babes [ online ] Available:

hypertext transfer protocol: //abcnews.go.com/sections/living/DailyNews/violence000726.html

( July 26, 2000 ) .