Third World Concept Essay Research Paper

Free Articles

Third World Concept Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

& # 8220 ; Discuss Whether The Concept Of The & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; Still Has Any Validity & # 8221 ; .

Assignment. Try A:

First, in order to turn to this rubric, the term & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; must foremost be defined in footings of it & # 8217 ; s origin and intending. The industrial revolution in the 19th century led to Western-Europe and the United States going progressively technological, industrialized and urbanized. This brought rise to the construct of a divided universe ; those states that were developed and those that were more & # 8216 ; crude & # 8217 ; . The outgrowth of this construct of development led manner for theories ( which were by and large accepted at the clip ) such as the development of states happens in a additive procedure, and that to the benefit of more developed states this procedure should be encouraged. Since so nomenclature has altered from descriptions such as & # 8216 ; backward & # 8217 ; to & # 8216 ; Underdeveloped & # 8217 ; to the present usage of the phrase LEDC ( Less Economically Developed Country ) . The group of LEDC & # 8217 ; s in inquiry have been besides referred to as the & # 8216 ; South & # 8217 ; , from the normally referred to Brandt Report ( 1980 ) , or the Report of the Independent Commission on International Development Issues. This study stated that the & # 8216 ; rich developed & # 8217 ; states were located in the & # 8216 ; north & # 8217 ; , and that the & # 8216 ; hapless undeveloped & # 8217 ; or & # 8216 ; developing & # 8217 ; states were located in the & # 8217 ; south & # 8217 ; . However, in this study the & # 8216 ; North/South & # 8217 ; divide used in the Brandt Report will non be used, alternatively the usage of the phrase & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; will be used in its topographic point. The phrase originally derives from France ( & # 8217 ; Tiers Monde & # 8217 ; ) in the 1950 & # 8217 ; s to depict the peasantry ( the & # 8216 ; Third Estate & # 8217 ; ) in pre-Revolutionary 1789 France. By the terminal of the 1960 & # 8217 ; s nevertheless this construct was used to assist depict the division of the universes three chief economic and political powers. These generalizations were progressively used during the extremum of the cold war as a method of division between the capitalist states, communist states, and the non-aligned provinces. First there was the & # 8216 ; First World & # 8217 ; , which were the industrialized, capitalist free market economic systems. These included such states as the United States of America, Australia and Western Europe. Then there was the & # 8216 ; Second World & # 8217 ; , which were the Communist centrally planned economic systems such as the socialist Russian province and the Warsaw Pact. Then came the & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; , the states which were still developing ( in relation to the first and 2nd universes ) and so were more disadvantaged and disadvantaged.

It is highly hard to specify and place & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; states depending upon which standard is being used as the footing of the development measuring, because non all states are indistinguishable in their aspirations towards political and cultural ends which leads to a great diverseness and scope even within this one specified group. The different signifiers of development measuring for states can be GNP ( Gross National Produce ) per capita per annum, population size, infant mortality rates per 1000 Born, life anticipation, illiteracy rates, entree to safe H2O, urban populatio

N and Debt to First World states and international Bankss such as the World Bank. Examples of these big disparities can be seen by comparing two Third World states such as China and Peru. The GNP per capita for China is $ 860 ( US ) , while for Peru it is $ 2610. Both states have a life anticipation of around 70 old ages old, yet while the population of Peru is about 24 million, China has one of 1227 million people. These pronounced disparities show the broad scope of diverseness between two states which are generalised under the same class. This can do it hard to specify a Third World state because utilizing these different measuring techniques, while a wide group of states can be characterised by their low income and disadvantage in proviso, non all states are ever included by these steps which makes it hard to province the boundaries of the Third World.

It is because of several grounds that the cogency of the phrase & # 8216 ; The Third World & # 8217 ; has been placed into inquiry over the past decennary. The antecedently mentioned turning distinction and variegation within the Third World has lead to the usage of the generalization of the construct to be questioned. Besides, the rejection of a & # 8216 ; additive way & # 8217 ; to development agencies that different states will endeavor towards development through different classs at different velocities, and should non be measured against how the & # 8216 ; West & # 8217 ; First World developed, assuming that all states are in fact draw a bead oning to be like Western states such as the United States and Western-Europe, which they are surely wholly non. Not merely is at that place broad disparities between states, but at that place can even be a larger assortment within a individual state. In these states a really little minority can keep a big sum of capital and unrecorded highly flush life styles really similar to those of people in the First World, while the big bulk of the population live in extreme or absolute poorness.

Another one of the strongest unfavorable judgment of the construct of the & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; is that since the creative activity of this theory, the Second World ( Communist ) states have fallen ( with the exclusion of the socialist Chinese province ) , which places the usage of both the constructs of the Second World and later the Third universe into inquiry as to whether they are any longer worthwhile generalizations.

However despite these statements, although unequivocal boundaries can non be made around the & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; due to the broad regional and national disparities, I beleive that the generalization of these states into the individual organic structure of the & # 8216 ; Third World & # 8217 ; is still a worthwhile construct. While the & # 8216 ; Second World & # 8217 ; may no longer be a relevant factor, there is still the big rift nowadays between the two groups of the First and Third Worlds, and so reinforces the go oning relevancy of this construct.

Bibliography.

Geography Of The Third World. Second Edition. 1996. Dickenson. J

Microsoft Encarta.

Oxford Encyclopaedia Unknown.

The Developing World: An Introduction. 1994. Simpson. E. S

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out