Trade Commission Essay, Research Paper

The Federal Trade Commission, in subjecting a Request For Public Comment Concerning Guides For The Dog And Cat Food Industry, is inquiring the American Public to measure guidelines for supervising the favored nutrient industry that have been in topographic point since 1969. Since the basic push of the original guidelines was to command deceit in the industry, it is difficult to conceive of that the populace would differ with the original purpose of the guidelines. It would besides be prudent to measure whether a reappraisal of such sound guidelines would be either necessary or worth the cost of transporting out the appraisal. On the other manus, it has been 30 old ages since the original guidelines were implemented, giving the populace and the industry clip to see if the guidelines have done their occupation in a cost-efficient mode and whether or non they need to be retooled for an industry that has gone through considerable technological and economic alterations. Therefore, it would look sensible to carry on a study that would aim cardinal countries, such as any imbrication of the guidelines with federal, province, and local Torahs, the unity of industry self-regulation in a new epoch of economic and technological progresss, and whether or non the guidelines have imposed undue cost to both the industry and the populace.

Few would reason with the points of the original guidelines, whether it is supervising misdirecting claims in advertisement, or supervising the quality of the merchandises themselves. Despite economic and technological progresss that have taken topographic point in the industry since 1969, the guidelines still hold up every bit sound. There are besides federal, province, and local jurisprudence

s that attempt to see the same unity in the favored nutrient industry. The favored nutrient industry besides closely proctors itself. Given all these factors, it would look best to oppugn the necessity of such a study, or, at least, to restrict its range and cost.

What could be unobserved motivations for originating such a reappraisal? The American pet nutrient industry would surely desire to maintain force per unit area on the authorities to modulate foreign competition, take a firm standing that rivals meet the same rigorous criterions set for American makers. The FTC would besides stand to derive from the figure of its workers that would be paid for carry oning the reappraisal and the power and prestigiousness that such guidelines tend to give the FTC

It might be utile to measure how much cost the original guidelines have imposed on the industry and the consumer in increased monetary values for favored nutrients and if the guidelines have added anything to federal, province, and local Torahs that already monitor the industry. Questioning the populace on these issues seems more sensible than rehashing guidelines that already do a thorough occupation of turn toing sensible concerns about deceit.

Fiscal concerns and societal concerns are valid at the same clip and should be kept n balance. In a decennary that has seen a continual argument about the bounds and range of authorities versus the function of authorities in protecting its people, it is likely a good thought to allow the public weigh in on the effectivity of the original 1969 guidelines in a manner that limits the cost of the study, while measuring the effectivity of the original guidelines, over and above already bing federal, province, and local Torahs.