Untitled Essay, Research Paper
Wordss = 937
Huxley s so called Utopia drastically suppresses the person in society. The people in this Utopia are wholly missing in important emotions which the progressive single possesses. They have no feelings of love, attention and understanding because blind felicity is a necessity for stableness. Bing devoid of these features the people in this Utopia are practical automatons. The people in this society take a life purely controlled by the authorities for the intent of keeping a stable society. Thus the ultimate inquiry is asked: Is it worth stamp downing free will and individualism for a stable and perfect society. In Huxley s utopia life s general intent is to continue the stableness of the authorities to organize a perfect society. In an kernel world has lost loose will because they are no longer responsible for themselves because they are responsible for the province. The society is depended upon a control. But is flawlessness what a society truly needs? Our imperfectnesss make us human existences.
Loss of individualism in Huxley s Utopia can be attributed to see every bit good. & # 8220 ; All conditioning purposes at doing people like their ineluctable societal fate. ( 235 ) . Since values can be taught, in Brave New World the values established by the World State are impressed upon the kids. Certain devices such as electric dazes are used to go forth feelings upon people at a immature age as a agency to do babies afraid of books because books can incorporate controversial thoughts. This robs a sense of the person in the sense that from birth they are automatically taught things that go straight against their human nature. However this loss of individuality can be seen in our ain society as good. During babyhood, for the most portion our political orientations are extremely influenced by our parents and by other commanding factors. However in this society, compared to Huxley s Utopia, at a certain age we are free to believe what we want without society implementing certain thoughts on us. So the inquiry must be asked: which is more of import, a society that guarantees single freedom to which we choose our fates, or a society that is so perfect that single will is non necessary? Many modern philosophers have found that a stabile province requires a important loss in individuality. In Karl Marx s theory of a labor province happening the citizens will of course acknowledge the importance of keeping the province over the importance of single addition. But why must individuality be sacrificed in a Utopia? A Utopia is defined as an ideally perfect topographic point, particularly in its societal, political,
and moral facets. In Huxley s Utopia it seems that there is no ground for the person to arise because their society about guarantees them felicity.
It can be argued that Huxley s oppressive and commanding Utopia has many good qualities vital to its being. One could deduce that because no 1 in Huxley s Utopia has of all time experienced freedom that they would non hanker for it at all. There is no manner that they know what is losing from their society. If the authorities provides for all your necessities so there is no existent ground for freedom. However as a individual who enjoys the freedom to take my ain fate I am able to see the difference between holding freedom and non holding it. Because I ve experient freedom I can understand the importance of freedom and justice Huxley s society based on that experience. Even if this deficiency of freedom will take to uncontested felicity it is still unfair. If life is merely happiness devoid of battle there is perfectly no intent to their lives and there is nil to larn from.
One major portion of the Brave New World is the fact that there is no existent favoritism. Peoples are genetically altered to be wholly happy in their environment and their topographic point in their category. There is no racial or gender favoritism either. Because the citizens are of course bread to their topographic point in society there is no oppugning anything. With being in such a technological age there is a possibility, even if really minute, that something like this could go on. In fact it about seems necessary to go on in order to make any type of human being that will non oppugn its topographic point in society. As worlds we of course question our establishments and our societies. There is no possible manner that society could of all time develop in to this type of province without engineering that would do us non oppugn our fates. The Ultimate defect in a Utopia is that it controls a individual s fate. As human beings we are given free will. Huxley s Utopia in a sense plays the function of God in society and denying us the free will. While the people under this system don t know anything of what freedom truly is, there is a strong possibility that if they were to witness simply a glimpse at its shadow they would hanker for that freedom which they lacked. Possibly Huxley is someway seeking to demo the reader the importance of freedom and individuality by demoing that without it we are merely populating in an apathetic universe with no end because everything that needs to be decided has already been determined.
In Billy Bud, Melville attempts to indicate out how it is possible for the person to map in society.
