Valuess Of Humanity Essay, Research Paper

Valuess

Does humanity truly necessitate to be improved? Has our society gotten so bad that we need to do alterations that will purportedly do it better? There are decidedly jobs that need to be dealt with. We have a batch of force, instruction jobs, every bit good as other offenses in our society, but overall, I feel that humanity is making reasonably good at this point in history.

The betterments that decidedly need to be made are being worked on throughout our society. The force in our schools is a major job that needs to be addressed. Most people blame video games or music wordss for perverting the immature heads and turning them into violent felons. I feel that the parents of these kids are where the incrimination should really be focused. The parents should pay more attending to the lives? of their kids.

The alterations proposed by Grant Fjermedal in his short narrative, Artificial Intelligence, are non even near to being good thoughts. I could non believe that a individual could really come up with the insane thoughts that Fjermedal did. He feels that we should all allow a automaton sawbones scan our encephalons, and turn our heads into computing machine plans. These computing machine plans would so be downloaded into a robotic organic structure that the individual chose before the surgery was performed. This would purportedly give all worlds ageless life. We would besides so be able to do backup transcripts of our heads or computing machine plans, so that we could populate our alleged lives, or certain minutes of them, once more and once more, doing alterations that we experience could better them.

This truly irritates me in a batch of different ways. The fact that you would hold to abandon your human organic structure to come in into that of a automaton is merely scaring. This immediately limits your sense of touch, odor, gustatory sensation, and sight. What sort of a life would that be? This besides changes humanity. If everyone in the universe was a automaton, the interaction between each other would non be about the same as it is with worlds. Automatons can non make the same things that worlds

can. For illustration, how would two automatons snog? Kissing is a really passionate feeling, and metal touching other metal surely wouldn? t be as passionate. The deficiency of feeling is another thing that fusss me about the proposal by Fjermedal. No more gustatory sensation, no more sight. Those lives would decidedly non be for me.

Aldous Huxley besides feels that humanity demands to be changed in his short narrative, conditioning the Children. In this narrative, a physician shows an experiment that electrically shocks guiltless babes if they touch roses, and blazes Sirens and bells in the babes? ears if they look at the books, which he set up in the center of an empty room. This seems really barbarous and unusual. Huxley gives the thought that it is a good manner to acquire people to act the manner that their seniors feel they should. That takes off from the freedom of idea from the babes. It teaches them false lessons that will impact them for the remainder of their lives. What is incorrect with books and roses in the first topographic point? Absolutely nil. There is no ground for taking these points off from the babes in the first topographic point, and Huxley gives no account for the thought of taking them off.

Both Fjermedal and Huxley have their ain thoughts about betterments that they feel need to be made to humanity. They think that by doing these alterations, they will better our society greatly. Both writers presented hideous thoughts that I feel would ache our society a batch more than bettering anything. There might be a few things that seem to acquire improved, but at that place would decidedly be a batch more things taken off from humanity.

There are decidedly jobs in our society, and both writers may acknowledge some of the same jobs that I have seen. The writers nevertheless propose unlikely solutions that would impact society and life style in a negative manner, instead than make them any good. We have a good society right now, and I feel that we should do merely minor alterations, instead than the dramatic alterations proposed by the writers. Possibly we should take Fjermedal and Huxley and have their mental positions checked.