What Impact Do The Mass Media Have

Free Articles

On Modern Government And Politics. Essay, Research Paper

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The mass media is now a planetary phenomena and has revolutionised the manner persons communicate with each other and receive information. In this essay I will analyze the three signifiers of mass media & # 8211 ; newspaper, wireless and telecasting & # 8211 ; and the manner they have evolved. I will explicate the three chief theories associating to the impact of mass media on the populace. I will so discourse how media has altered the accent of authorities at election clip and on a daily footing. The term & # 8216 ; mass media & # 8217 ; embraces all sorts of information beginnings, such as books, booklets, mail handbills and movies. The three rule beginnings of political information are nevertheless telecasting, wireless and newspapers. The mass media is a recent invention which has reformed the manner political relations and authorities operates. & # 8220 ; Without newspapers, wireless and pre-eminently telecasting, the present political system could non work. The media are so almighty and all-pervasive we are frequently incognizant of the habit-forming clasp they exert over our attending and the messages they implant in our consciousness on a whole scope of matters. & # 8221 ; Television is widely seen as the most of import of the three mediums, and radio the least. In a study associating to the 1983 British election, telecasting was cited as the most of import media beginning by 63 % of respondents, newspapers by 29 % and wireless by 4 % . Prior to mass media, communications was chiefly verbal, between little groups, or by the church or political groups such as the Diggers or Levellers. The first medium to come about was newspapers at the terminal of the Nineteenth Century. These were mostly unregulated and free to offer sentiments and be openly biased. By the mid-Twentieth century, wireless had begun to take over as the chief beginning of information. Hitler was the first politician to work the potency of wireless. In the United States and Great Britain, Roosevelt and Baldwin introduced the medium in a more soft manner. Radio was the much used medium during the war with things such as Churchill & # 8217 ; s addresss. Television begun to do an visual aspect during the war, used to demo movies reenforcing nationalism and opposition. After the war, telecasting took over as the chief medium. Nixons & # 8217 ; & # 8216 ; Checkers speech & # 8217 ; in 1952 is seen as the beginning of the telecasting revolution. Ironically, telecasting was Nixons ruin in 1960 in the first televised argument, it showed that visual aspect on telecasting is every bit of import as the message. There are three wide statements refering the effects of the mass media on the populace and therefore authorities and political relations & # 8211 ; sentiment forming, sentiment reinforcing, and no effects. The sentiment organizing statement believes that the media form sentiments held by the spectator, since the media chooses the docket, it besides shapes what issues are thought approximately. This position depicts the spectator as holding no or few sentiments before media exposure and so accepts the statements and sentiments put frontward. The sentiment reenforcing statement believes that the spectator will be more likely to accept sentiments similar to their ain, than to alter their sentiment as a consequence of the exposure to the media. & # 8220 ; Persuasive communicating maps far more often as an agent of support than as an agent of change. & # 8221 ; The no effects statement is a & # 8216 ; minimum effects & # 8217 ; attack, based on research of the elections in the 1940s and 50s. It concludes that alteration in vote is non compatible with media influence. It appears that this survey did small to look at other influences, such as partiality or an persons background. The strongest thought seems to be a mixture of support and sentiment forming. In support theory, when people are exposed to the media coverage of political relations, they are more likely to be confirmed in their bing beliefs than to be swayed and take on new thoughts. This statement is supplemented by the thought that people are able to filtrate information. The three features of filtrating are selective exposure, selective perceptual experience and selective keeping. Selective exposure describes how many people avoid political relations wholly, while others interested in political relations will favor newspapers, telecasting or wireless programmes which reflect instead than dispute their positions. Selective perceptual experience refers to the positions and values which people use to & # 8216 ; edit & # 8217 ; information, accepting that which they identify with and rejecting that which they do non. Selective keeping is the same procedure as perceptual experience but refers to what people remember. This procedure of filtrating appears most identifiable in those who read newspapers in the United Kingdom, likely because newspapers are seen as the most colored and there is a big choice of them. The chief differentiation between support theory and the sentiment organizing statement is to whether a individual has any pre-disposed thoughts before media influence or if they are tabular rasa & # 8211 ; space, with no prepossessions. The sentiment forming statement would province that all persons must originally have the information to establish sentiments on from somewhere & # 8211 ; which is the function of the media. It besides points out that the support theory does non look to do sense in an age when party penchants have weakened and people are voting much more harmonizing to issues which they have learnt about through the media. It besides asks that if the media merely reinforces thoughts and can non organize or alter sentiments, why do political parties persist in passing big amounts of money in the media to acquire elected? Furthermore, why do some provinces feel it necessary to ban information non consistent with their political orientation? The support theory argues that people are capable of organizing their ain thoughts based on the filtering procedure & # 8211 ; they will place with a given thought and so farther exposure reinforces it. Persons are ne’er wholly tabular rasa as this filtering procedure already exists. & # 8220 ; The political sensitivities and group commitments set the end ; all that is read and heard becomes helpful and effectual insofar as it guides the elector to his already & # 8216 ; take & # 8217 ; destination. & # 8221 ; Blumler argues that both reenforcing and sentiment forming thoughts are at work, albeit with different people. He divides people into two classs, those interested in political relations and those non. Those with an involvement in political relations have some underlying party commitment and so will have media information and filter out parts they do non hold with. With those with an involvement in political relations, support theory is more applicable. Those with no involvement in political relations are far less likely to hold an implicit in political commitment and so will either filter out less or none of the media & # 8217 ; s message, so they are more antiphonal to the mass media. The job for the media is to be able to derive the attending of the uninterested and acquire them to listen to the thoughts. So for illustration, it can be masqueraded as amusement or comedy & # 8211 ; such as the Red Wedge comics in the eightiess who based their Acts of the Apostless on a pro-labour party platform. This type of media is evidently sentiment forming in purpose but often, it is non able to alter sentiments as it falls & # 8216 ; on deaf ears. & # 8217 ; In short, aggregate communications are & # 8220 ; an inefficient technique for altering beliefs and behavior, & # 8221 ; because, & # 8220 ; the message tends mostly to be received by those who are already sympathetic to it and hence least in demand of alteration, & # 8221 ; and, & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; for the balance of the population the message is ignored, & # 8216 ; crowded out & # 8217 ; , by other more powerful communications. & # 8221 ; The inquiries of why authoritiess spend money on electoral runs and why others censor information set in the account of sentiment organizing theory can now be addressed. In response to the former, it seems authoritiess publicize their policies as a manner of seeking to make the uninterested or convince interested protagonists who may be & # 8216 ; drifting & # 8217 ; between the two parties and so prepared to listen to any communications. A response to the latter inquiry appears harder. An statement could be made that those interested in hearing the communications are receptive to the information censored and would move if the information was available. Whilst the information is censored, there is no stimulation for action and so the authorities remains in power. The illustration of the prostration of the Soviet Union can be used to show the effects of the mass media being allowed to publish what they wish after a long period of censoring. Berlatsky argues that the media held an of import function, & # 8220 ; liberalism began to gnaw the Soviet system from interior and our imperativeness played all but the decisive function in the subsequent outgrowth of Perestroika. & # 8221 ; If Burlatsky & # 8217 ; s statement is accepted, so the imperativeness was a chief cause in the ruin of communism, so Gorbachev and eventually the prostration of the Soviet Union. In the Soviet Union, one time free from censoring, the imperativeness were allowed to publish all the thoughts and sentiments which the populace were receptive to but were antecedently non allowed to hold.

Following the information being made available, the populace acted upon it and enacted alteration. In this case, the media formed the sentiments of those who did non hold old cognition and reinforced the beliefs of those who did. This illustration shows what could happen if the imperativeness is non censored by a authorities who perceive it as a menace. It is interesting to observe that during the failed putsch of 1991, the imperativeness were one time once more censored. The media so far has been portrayed as a inactive histrion in the political universe. It must be remembered that those in the media besides have aims to accomplish: they must maximize their selling possible to increase net incomes, they may besides subscribe to a peculiar political orientation or set of thoughts which it promotes in its coverage. These factors could be seen to take to the media coverage in a colored manner and non been wholly impartial and factual. This, if the opinion-forming and reinforcing theories are considered, means that the populace will keep positions which are skewed without them gaining. This point further emphasises the impact that the mass media have on authorities and political relations and the potency it has to change the results of political events. If it is accepted that the mass media have an consequence on modern authorities and political relations via the sentiment forming and reinforcing of thoughts, so it is necessary to analyze what these effects are. There seems two distinguishable times to split authorities action into: at election clip, and daily running. In the United States, electoral candidacy has incorporated audio-visual tools since 1952 and has altered the manner elections are fought. In 1952, Eisenhower employed Thomas Rosser Reeves Jr who was a selling innovator. He simplified ‘Ikes’ message so it was more apprehensible on the telecasting and wireless. He requested that Eisenhower ne’er develop more than one class of statements in any individual address, imperativeness conference or telecasting visual aspect. Eisenhower besides tried to do himself look younger and utilize speech notes instead than a to the full written text. The democrats’ scheme with Stevenson was to hold measure instead than quality, unluckily, all his half-hour broadcasts were shown tardily at dark and so non many people of all time watched them. The so campaigner for the Vice-presidency, Nixon, made the ‘checkers speech’ and steadfastly established telecasting as a powerful political medium, 1956 saw the usage of short advertisement musca volitanss and negative candidacy. Based on the experience of 1952 election, this new scheme seemed more appealing to the populace and has remained since. 1960, and the outgrowth of a campaigner prepared to take acting lessons and a speechwriter, Kennedy came to triumph with the “model campaign.” The first televised argument between Nixon and Kennedy is said by some to hold made the difference between Kennedy winning and Nixon non. The first argument was watched by 70-75 million electors, Nixon had a knee redness and was physically worn down. Kennedy looked younger, tanned and more at easiness on the screen. Nixons makeup besides made him look like he had non been bothered to shave. “Since Nixon missed the presidential term by less than 100,000 ballots, a laughably narrow border on the graduated table of the United States, the first argument has by and large been considered as the ground for his failure.” The run emphasises a displacement from the public vote on issues and taking more notice of presentation and manner. This displacement to perception together with a simplification of the message can be attributed to the influence of the Mass Media. The runs after 1980 have taken on other features such as the usage of the exposure chance – the campaigner shown in a peculiar state of affairs, for illustration, siting a Equus caballus or walking to or from a vehicle. However, the media is going more expensive. Since 1980, about half of federal run budgets for presidential elections have been spent on purchasing telecasting airtime. The trust on telecasting and its high costs has led the manner for the likes of Steve Forbes ( 1996 ) and Ross Perot ( 1992 ) to go involved in Presidential elections without holding a steadfast political base ( for illustration, party or cabal backup, political experience, or prior cognition ) . Wealth has become a barrier to anyone wishing to go elective and a manner for the rich to hold a spell. Negative candidacy in the 1980s went on more, the Bush runs of 1988 and 1992 were, “ruthless, trusting on fierce negative spots.” The purpose to debar attending off from on campaigner, and underscore a trait or past experience of the other campaigner which is likely to deter electors from electing him. Although it worked for Bush in 1988, it had less affect against Bill Clinton. With daily effects of the media, another American illustration – Ronald Reagan – shows how the right individual can accommodate and utilize the media to their advantage. Ronald Reagan was President from 1981 until 1989 and was the first President to finish the two full footings since Eisenhower ( 1953-1961 ) . He came to the station with no experience of Washington, “He was an ex-actor, an ex-professional after dinner talker. He had no direct experience of national authorities before going President, and he had no experience of international politics.” His usage of exposure chances, phase managed presentations and addresss broadcast by the media greatly enhanced his popularity and his ability to regulate. Richard Neustadt remarks that Reagans’ background in moving, usage of appeal, ability to look concerned and dominate conversations with anecdotes which filled up clip and prevented heated arguments, raised his popularity and prestigiousness with the populace. ‘The Great Communicator’ together with his Director of Communications managed to pull strings the media to their advantage. The promotion of engineering, leting unrecorded coverage of any event, allowed Reagan to be packaged in such a manner so that he would be shown in a discriminatory visible radiation by the intelligence hungry journalists. He besides ‘appealed to the people’ in prepared addresss, trying to call up the populace with changing success ; early on holding a bigger impact than subsequently on. The media with Reagan appeared to hold an immediate impact which diminished over clip. Reagans’ character and use of the media allowed him to come to power and remain reasonably popular. Without the media, it seems difficult to conceive of the ex-actor deriving power or go throughing the sum of statute law he managed to make. The mass media has had an tremendous impact on authorities and political relations. It appears that the media reinforces the sentiments of some and forms the sentiments of others. Using the illustrations of the USSR and USA, the media can be seen to hold a direct impact in the manner electoral runs are held and the daily running of authorities. More accent is placed on the media by politicians and this leads them to integrate it into their modus operandi and seek to utilize it to their advantage. The three theories discussed in relation to the effects of the media have different degrees of credibleness, the no-impact theory appears to miss any value, whereas the opinion-forming and reinforcing can be both argued to work. This has led some similar Blumler to reason that both are working, but on different people. The media has seen a rapid enlargement over the last half of the 20th century, peculiarly with telecasting, it now shapes how authorities is presented to the populace and therefore forces the authorities to accept the media and effort to pull strings it to their advantage. As the illustration of the USA shows, it has caused addresss to go simpler, more focused on a individual issue and be packaged in the right manner. The illustration of the USSR shows what can happen if the imperativeness are allowed to publish what they will against a antecedently oppressive government. What will happen to the media in the hereafter is non known, but it can be certain that it will go on to hold an impact. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Benjamin, G. ( ed. ) The Communications Revolution in Politics. Academy of Political Science. Vol. 34, No 4. New York. 1982. Blumler, J.G. An Overview Of Recent research Into The Impact Of Broadcasting In Democratic Politics. In Clark, M.J. ( ed. ) Politics and The Media. Passim Burlatsky, F. The Dangers of Press ‘Power Without responsibility’ . In Miller, W.L. ( ed. ) Alternatives To Freedom. passim Clark, M.J. ( ed. ) Politics and The Media. Pergamon Press. Oxford. 1979. Jones, B. Politicss UK. Harvester Wheatsheaf. Hemel Hempstead. 1994. Joslyn, R. Mass Media and Elections. Addison-Wesley. London. 1984. Maarek, P.J Political Marketing and Communication. John Libbey. London. 1995. Miller, W.L. ( ed. ) Alternatives To Freedom. Longman. London. 1995. Neustadt, R.E. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents. Free Press. USA. 1991. Patterson, T.E. Television and election scheme. In Benjamin, G. ( ed. ) The Communications Revolution in Politics. Passim Schupham, J. The Revolution In Communications. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hertfordshire. 1970.

391

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Hi!
I'm Katy

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out