As the universe today becomes more complex in term of political relations and economic sciences. there are understandings or pacts created in order to keep the stabilisation and development. One of the important things that most provinces chiefly concern about is the economic development ; as a affair of fact. since the prostration of the Soviet Union. the universe has given more precedence to the economic development. On top of that. there were creative activities of free trade understanding among states or parts ; for case. ASEAN was created in the intent of regional development particularly in economic. Furthermore. ASEAN has proposed an aim to be succeeded in 2015 which is known as the economic integrating or ASEAN Economic Community. There are three of import factors that lead to the creative activity of ASEAN economic integrating in 2015. First. ASEAN free trade country for free flow of goods is an understanding to cut down the trade barrier across the ASEAN states. found in 1992 ( The ASEAN Secretariat. 2012 ) . At first. there were merely six members of ASEAN connection and discoursing about the free flow of goods during the early 1990s. In 2000. ASEAN has reached four more members such as Cambodia. Laos. Vietnam. and Myanmar. and those states were non developed much in economic ; so. as the former six members could make the similarity development in term of economic. the proposal that was concerned over the free trade country is still existed.

It needs clip for the new member provinces to make the development as the ASEAN has defined the twelvemonth 2015 for the economic integrating. and it means that the new member provinces need to develop themselves until they reach the demand from the other member in productiveness which it was estimated to be in 2015. Additionally. in order to make this aim. it needs the full new member provinces have higher economic growing and mark for understanding on trade. Once a state has free trade. it could take to the international competition and besides developing the state. Second. ASEAN model understanding on services was created in order to restrict the flow of services. established in 1995 and besides known as the factor taking to economic integrating ( Hai. 2004 ) . The purpose of making this understanding is to advance the free flow of services in the economic integrating 2015. As some states in ASEAN still need to develop. all of the member provinces have to collaborate good among other particularly in trade and instruction. On top of that. technological transportation from province to province could take to the adept labour forces. While holding adept forces. it makes easier for province to pull the investing.

As all of the members consist of accomplishment labours and signifier as a regional group. they can derive the get downing power in term of production and services. Furthermore. ASEAN will play more functions in the universe economic competition on free flow of services every bit good as the productions. Consequently. it could increase in service market ; for case. Singapore is one of the developed states that is considered as the cognition based economic which is referred to the usage of services beside productions ( Yue. 2001 ) . Another factor that leads to the creative activity of ASEAN economic integrating 2015 is the ASEAN investing understanding ( AIA ) . It is an understanding between the member provinces for the unfastened and free flow of investing throughout the part every bit good as to enrich the fight and attractive force of Direct Foreign Investment. This understanding focal point on four designs such as progressive liberalisation of investing among member provinces. heightening the protection of investors and their investing. betterment of ordinances to increase investing. and publicity integrated investing country.

Due to these rules. it can lend a batch advantages to member provinces chiefly for three facets. First. because of the free flow of investing into the government. ASEAN has gained the Capital addition. Even when there was the Asiatic Financial crisis. ASEAN remained strong with the growing of threefold accounted from US $ 23 billion in 1998 to US $ 69 billion. Obviously. the intra-ASEAN has besides been expanded to US $ 10. 7 million. and for the foreign direct investing. it keeps turning which accounted for US $ 30. 1 billion ( 2012 ) . Second. AIA is one of chief causes that create occupations for most of ASEAN citizens which about in sum of 600 million people. When there were direct foreign investings. many mills and companies consumed labour forces to work in their house ; hence. as a consequence. ASEAN employment rate will lift unusually. Last but non least. the economic development is certainly achieved by the free flow of investing.

There will be advancement in any field such as substructures. engineering. health care. instruction. etc when it comes to the handiness to the fabrication or services. All in all. the ASEAN investing understanding is the drive cause that provide three of import benefits like increasing capital. making more occupations. and bettering economic development. After adverting about the factors that lead to the ASEAN economic integrating 2015. we can deduce that it is of import for ASEAN to be ready for the economic integrating 2015 as it could take ASEAN to go a extremely developed part that plays of import function in the universe economic.

Mentions
Hai. T. C. ( 2004 ) . Common Recognition of Surveying Qualifications within the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services. Fig. cyberspace. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. fig. net/pub/monthly_articles/november_2004/teo_november_2004. pdf The ASEAN Secretariat. ( 2012 ) . The ASEAN Free Trade Area. Asean. org. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. asean. org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/overview-10 Yue. C. S. ( 2001 ) . Singapore: Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Retrieved fromhttp: //www. d1074616. sphere. com/worldcapitalinstitute/makciplatform/files/Singapore_Towards % 20k-Economy_0. pdf Subject: Preparing for the ASEAN Economic Community 2015: What Can We and Government Do?

The Practice of Liberalism in the ASEAN Economic Community: Changing Challenges into Positive Opportunities for the Success of Indonesia in the ASEAN Economic Community in 2015

ASEAN Economic Community or normally called the AEC will be realized in the following two old ages. AEC planned to take topographic point in 2015. In order to recognize the AEC in 2015. all ASEAN states should liberalise trade in free motion of goods. services. investing. skilled labour. and freer flow of capital. as listed in the AEC design. Based on this. the ASEAN Economic Community can be used as a container for the possible benefit for the states incorporated in it. but on the other manus besides at the same time AEC can be a boomerang consequence for states that are non yet ready to confront the AEC in 2015. Therefore. the free market which will be implemented in the 2015 AEC makes the states who are members of ASEAN are viing to fix its resources in order to vie and last in a free competition because they do non desire to go victims of development in the AEC 2015. Indonesia as one of the states that are members of the ASEAN community is besides incorporated in this economic integrating.

Preparation of Indonesia in confronting the AEC 2015 which is acquiring closer to the finish line is interesting to discussed. given the euphory in welcoming the 2015 AEC Indonesia is still non so marked. whereas the 2015 AEC will get down in two old ages. In this instance if Indonesia does non simply want to be a witness of the exploited towards the being of economic integrating in ASEAN ( AEC ) . Indonesia needs to recognize the incorporate challenges that will be faced in the execution of the AEC in 2015. It aims to do Indonesia can alter the challenges they face into chances in order to acquire benefits due the AEC 2015. In analysing the challenges to be faced by Indonesia. I would wish to utilize the position of the theory of liberalism sing that the constitution of the AEC as a free trade country. individual market aims to do ASEAN more dynamic and competitory market which is the execution of liberalism. The broad apprehension of international political economic system as an application of the theory and methodological analysis of international economic sciences that separates the interaction between economic sciences and political relations.

The being of a strong and active function in the mechanism of the market has eclipsed the authorities governments who are the chief histrions of the state. Economicss and political relations are two spheres are supposed to be separated and each operating harmonizing to the regulations of logic and its ain logic. Because progressives believe that economic factors are the determiner of all societal procedures and so harmonizing to them that international political economic phenomena can be explained by the assorted bing theories in economic sciences. Linked to the challenges faced by Indonesia in AEC 2015 was that the execution of the liberalism in the economic field may be adversely affected because there is no 1 system that was created in this universe is perfect. The following are the negative impacts of the execution of the liberalisation of the economic system: First liberalism in the universe economic system can enlarge the spread between states. Second. liberalism will make a dependence relationship between rich states with hapless states. Third. the market mechanism system will do inauspicious monopoly power.

Fourth. Liberalism tends to convey instability in the economic system. Based on the four negative impact of liberalism. we will cognize how the challenges faced by Indonesia significantly and farther more we can cognize the appropriate ways in confronting the challenges toward ASEAN Economic Community 2015. The first negative impact of the execution of liberalism is liberalism in the universe economic system can enlarge the spread between states. The liberalisation of assorted sectors of the economic system will make free competition in the universe market. It means. when free competition occurs. so the states that have comparatively high degrees of the economic system will be stronger. while those with comparatively low degrees of the economic system will be weak. In this instance the economic degree ASEAN states are really diverse. Specifically. the degree of economic advancement in ASEAN classified into ( 1 ) a group of developed states ( Singapore ) . ( 2 ) a dynamic group of states ( Malaysia and Thailand ) . ( 3 ) group of middle-income states ( Indonesia. the Philippines and Brunei Darussalam ) . and ( 4 ) group of developing states ( Cambodia. Myanmar. Laos. Vietnam ) . It is unfortunate that place of Indonesia based on the economic degree in ASEAN is in the group of in-between income states.

Though Indonesia to all its possible and its resources can be do itself as a large state compared to other ASEAN states. It is caused by conditions in the Indonesian national which tends to be unstable. Not merely economic. but besides political stableness in Indonesia was non stable Furthermore when we link to the addition corruptness instance that recently occurred in Indonesia. So in order to get the better of this job required an integrative solution formulated by the national authorities to better national conditions in Indonesia. The solution does non merely concentrate on economic reform but besides to better political stableness to run healthier. Infrastructure Improvements. reform the institutional and administration in order to hold integrated coordination. and bettering the quality of human resources in Indonesia are three chief keys to cover the challenges faced by Indonesia in AEC 2015. Second. liberalism will make a dependence relationship between rich states with hapless states. One job that occurs is the policy of denationalization of State Owned Enterprises ( SOE ) / ( BUMN ) a state that is purchased by a foreign state as a effect of liberalisation. Because the province “considers” itself no longer able to pull off and finance the production procedure of the SOEs. though by and large an entity or SOE houses that are closely related to lives of many people.

So it does non govern out the influence of one states to the other states might hold a strong influence. In this instance. the authorities should be steadfastly protecting state-owned belongings because no denying that with the ASEAN economic community of province sovereignty would melt. It must hold been the challenge for Indonesia in which Indonesia should construct the image of self-respect as a strong province despite sharing sovereignty between ASEAN states. Not merely has the strong ability of diplomatic negotiations Indonesian authorities should besides put up a strong military device to construct an image as a large state. Third. the market mechanism system will do inauspicious monopoly power. It means. if in pattern a developing state can non accommodate itself to liberate trade competition in AEC 2015. it can be said that state would merely be a victim of other major states which are able to rule the market. It can be ascertained that the merchandises made ??in province are victims of free trade can be dead in the market. In this issue. Indonesia should cognize the economic histrions who will vie at the AEC 2015.

Where we know that most of the Indonesian economic histrions come from enterprisers who run Small and Medium Enterprises ( SMEs ) . SMEs engaged in assorted economic activities which are now considered by all stakeholders as an of import sector in turn toing the jobs faced by the nation’s unemployment and poorness. The function of SMEs that presently there were about 55 million units and concerns throughout Indonesia. non merely expected to increase employment. and tackle the job of unemployment. but it besides can speed up regional development. It implies that the function of authorities is no longer merely assist the growing of SMEs in the national degree. but how to do Indonesian SMEs can vie in the planetary market place. At least. there are three chief jobs faced by SMEs in Indonesia: ( 1 ) the issue of funding for capital. ( 2 ) technological issues which some SMEs still have non been able to optimise bing engineering. ( 3 ) selling issues. Associated to the three jobs mentioned supra. the authorities should concentrate on work outing the job of SMEs in Indonesia given that economic histrions in Indonesia are largely SMEs.

The solution is intended to supply micro-credit in the funding of capital and besides non bury to supply incorporate proficient preparation on the engineering used and besides how to market their merchandises expeditiously. Fourth. liberalism tends to convey instability in the economic system. In the free trade subsequently. AEC 2015 will take to monetary value volatility and exchange rates tend to be irregular. This status will increase the uncertainness in the national economic system when a state can non utilize it decently. In order to keep economic stableness and to avoid improper policy devising. Indonesian authorities who has duty in financial economic system policy and Indonesian Banks as a cardinal bank who has duty in pecuniary economic policy shapers must join forces in analysing free market in the 2015 AEC.

In short. ASEAN Economic Community that will be implemented in the following few old ages is non lone chances but besides cause menaces to ASEAN states. including Indonesia. Whether Indonesia will be a province that can take the chance to better their economic or otherwise go a state that is merely traveling to go victims of development for other states is a challenge and consequence of Indonesia’s readying in confronting AEC 2015. Based on the position of liberalism. AEC 2015 which imposes free trade among ASEAN states poses challenges to be faced by the ASEAN states including Indonesia. These challenges can be overcome to proper readying of the Indonesian authorities to national development plans that are appropriate and sustainable in the assorted sectors in order to accomplish the success of Indonesia in the ASEAN Economic Community 2015.

Bibliography

Ikbar. Yanuar. 2013. Ekonomi Politik Global 1. Bandung: Rafika Aditama hypertext transfer protocol: //www. asean. org/communities/asean-economic-community accessed on Monday. 9 December 2013. Indra Maipita. Liberalisasi dan Globalisasi Perdagangan. 2002. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. scribd. com/doc/13312233/LIBERALISASI-DAN-GLOBALISASI-PERDAGANGAN-INTERNASIONAL-by-Indra-Maipita accessed on Monday. 9 December 2013. Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia: Buku Menuju ASEAN Economic Community 2015. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //ditjenkpi. kemendag. travel. id/website_kpi/Umum/Setditjen/Buku % 20Menuju % 20ASEAN % 20ECONOMIC % 20COMMUNITY % 202015. pdf ) . hypertext transfer protocol: //www. smescoindonesia. com/infos/news/read/95 accessed on Tuesday. December 10. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //finance. detik. com/read/2013/10/05/104457/2378640/1036/di-forum-apec-2013-syarief-hasan-beberkan-3-masalah-ukm-indonesia accessed on Tuesday. December 10. 2013.

——————————————–
[ 2 ] . hypertext transfer protocol: //www. asean. org/communities/asean-economic-community accessed on Monday. 9 December 2013. [ 3 ] . Indra Maipita. Liberalisasi dan Globalisasi Perdagangan. 2002. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. scribd. com/doc/13312233/LIBERALISASI-DAN-GLOBALISASI-PERDAGANGAN-I
NTERNASIONAL-by-Indra-Maipita accessed on Monday. 9 December 2013. [ 4 ] . Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia: Buku Menuju ASEAN Economic Community 2015. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //ditjenkpi. kemendag. travel. id/website_kpi/Umum/Setditjen/Buku % 20Menuju % 20ASEAN % 20ECONOMIC % 20COMMUNITY % 202015. pdf ) . [ 5 ] . hypertext transfer protocol: //www. smescoindonesia. com/infos/news/read/95 accessed on Tuesday. December 10. 2013. [ 6 ] . Ibid.

[ 7 ] . hypertext transfer protocol: //finance. detik. com/read/2013/10/05/104457/2378640/1036/di-forum-apec-2013-syarief-hasan-beberkan-3-masalah-ukm-indonesia accessed on Tuesday. December 10. 2013.