Behavior Of Children Essay, Research Paper
The behavior kids exhibit is influenced by environmental
conditions, nevertheless to a lesser extent than the biological factors that
influence behaviour, unless the kid is badly abused. The environmental
factors have a limited impact when it comes to how a certain person will
behave when faced with certain conditions. Children may be taught how to
react in certain state of affairss, but merely because they see a violent film or play a
violent picture game they are non traveling to travel to school armed to the dentitions with
explosives and guns. For people to perpetrate the sorts of actions exhibited in
Columbine Colorado, there has to be some sort of mental disfunction, non
determined or affected by environmental conditions, driving these
persons. Therefor, farther censoring of telecasting, films, and picture
games is pathetic and will carry through nil.
Environmental conditions such as televison do act upon the behaviour
of kids to a certain extent. Beth Daley brings up the subject of the
emulation of professional wrestle in her article? Elementary School? s
Wrestling Children and Youth School Violence. ? Teachers seem to be
concerned because wrestling it is so easy to emulate. In her article, Ms.
Daley notes the actions of the module of Prescott Elementary School in
Norwood by saying that they, ? forbid the students form get bying wrestle
moves on school grounds. ? She besides states that? instructors are trained to
acknowledge pro wrestling manus signals that double as expletive words ( Daley ) . ?
This indicates that under certain conditions, environmental conditions, such
as telecasting, can strongly act upon the behaviour of kids. However, it
does non drive them to deliberately harm others. Sparing, inspired by pro
wrestle, can make state of affairss in which hurt and choler are a possibility,
thereby taking to existent force. Television and picture games do non
straight influence persons to deliberately harm others or perpetrate other
violent Acts of the Apostless.
Familial factors play a more of import function in finding if an
person will be prone to force than do environmental factors. Glenn
Garelik provinces that, ? scientists who study all types of felons? from
muggers, slayings, and school pace toughs to Armani clad
defalcators? progressively suspect that biological science plays a more important function. ?
He besides states that? many research workers now believe that the ground one
single commits a offense in a given case and another individual doesn? T
may hold every bit much to make with neurological, hormonal, and even anatomical
differences as it does with differences in upbringing and environment? , in
his article? Born Bad? . ? He besides states that? its difficult to happen any signifier of
behaviour that does non hold some biological constituent ( Garelik ) . ? These
& lt ;< br />
two statements back up the thought that biological science, non environment, is the key
factor in finding behaviour. Another obvious hint that biological science is the
major driving force behind violent behaviour is the fact that? throughout
history, offense and force have occurred in all civilizations, no affair how
different their societal and economic constructions ( Garelik ) . ? ? Another simple
fact indicating to a biological footing for force and criminalism is that in all
societies, about 90 per centum of violent felons are work forces? many of them
immature ( Garelik ) . ? This farther supports the point of biological science act uponing
behaviour by saying that the cause seems to be hormonal.
Childs are born with a disposition, this can be easy observed.
Some kids are diffident, others may be ambitious, some aggressive, etcetera.
While there is no offense cistron, this suggests that if an person is traveling to
be a violent person, it is determined before birth. As would be expected,
kids who are excessively aggressive, for illustration kids who bite and
exhibit inhuman treatment to animate beings, are much more likely to perpetrate violent Acts of the Apostless in
the ulterior periods in their lives.
Unfortunately, force seems to perpetuate itself, violent parents and
instructors who raise kids in a violent scene are, in consequence, bring forthing
violent members of society. Don Colburn provinces in his article, ? When
Violence Begins at Home? , that? Twenty-six per centum of American adolescents
have been hit or physically harmed by an grownup at place and another 10
per centum struck by a instructor or principal at school, harmonizing to the latest
Gallup young person pole. Half of teens said they had been hit or beaten by
person their ain age. ? He besides states that? today many of our immature
people are at great hazard in topographic points where they in all exclusion should experience the
safest? at school and place ( Colburn ) . ? Through the maltreatment of kids,
society, chiefly disciplinary figures, is doing kids who would non
under normal fortunes become violent persons, to go violent.
Children emulate what they see and experience, therefor if they are abused,
they will go opprobrious.
The way to a more peaceable society does non lie in the censoring of
the media, but through the early designation and intervention of jobs in
kids. The opprobrious inclinations shown by parents must besides halt in order
to cut down the violent nature of society. Through the intervention of kids
and even some grownups, incidents like the Columbine calamity can be avoided.
Bibliography
& # 65279 ;
Colburn, Don. ? When Violence Begins at Home. ? The Washington Post. 1994. Ebsco Host.
01 Mar. 2000.
Garelik, Glenn. ? Born Bad? . ? American Health Magazine. 13 Nov. 1993. SIRS.
01 Mar. 2000.
Daley, Beth. ? Elementary School? s Wrestling Children and Youth School Violence. ?