BILLY BUDD Essay, Research Paper

Before the Fall, Adam and Eve were perfect. They were guiltless and nescient, yet

perfect, so they were allowed to stay in the presence of God. Once they partook of the fruit of

the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, nevertheless, they instantly became dirty every bit good as

person. In Billy Budd, the writer, Herman Melville, presents a inquiry that stems straight from

this original wickedness of our first parents: Is it better to be guiltless and nescient, but good and

righteous, or is it better to be experienced and knowing? I believe that through this book,

Melville is stating us that we need to strike some sort of balance between these two thoughts ; we

demand to hold morality and virtuousness ; we need to be in the universe, but non of the universe.

To exemplify his subject, Melville uses a few characters who are all really different, the most

of import of which is Billy Budd. Billy is the focal point of the book and the individual individual whom

we are meant to larn the most from. On the ship, the Rights-of-Man, Billy is a cynosure among

his shipmates ; a leader, non by authorization, but by illustration. All the members of the crew look up to

him and love him. He is? strength and beauty. Narratives of his art [ are ] recited. Ashore he [ is ]

the title-holder, afloat the spokesman ; on every suited juncture ever foremost? ( 9 ) .

Despite his popularity among the crew and his hardworking attitude, Billy is transferred to

another British ship, the Indomitable. And while he is accepted for his expressions and happy

personality, ? ? barely here [ is ] he that cynosure he had antecedently been among those minor ship? s

companies of the merchandiser Marine? ( 14 ) . It is here, on the Indomitable that Billy says adieu to

his rights. It is here, besides, that Billy meets John Claggart, the master-at-arms. A adult male? in whom

was the passion of an evil nature, non engendered by barbarous preparation or perverting books or

licentious life but born with him and innate, in short? a corruption harmonizing to nature? ? ( 38 ) .

Here so, is presented a adult male with a personality and character to contrast and conflict

with Billy? s. Sweet, guiltless Billy instantly realizes that this adult male is person he does non wish

to traverse and so after seeing Claggart whip another crew-member for pretermiting his

duties, Billy? resolved that ne’er through laxness would he do himself apt to

such a trial or make or exclude nothing that might deserve even verbal rebuke? ( 31 ) . Billy is so good

and so guiltless that he tries his hardest to remain out of problem. ? What so was his surprise and

concern when finally he found himself acquiring into junior-grade problem on occasion about such

affairs as the stowage of his bag? which brought down on him a obscure menace from one of [ the

ship? s corporals ] ? ( 31 ) .

These little menaces and incidents set up the tenseness between Claggart and Billy, and put

the phase for a ulterior confrontation. They besides force Billy to seek for aid. The individual he goes

to is yet another type of character presented in this book. Red Whiskers. Red Whiskers was an

old veteran, ? long anglicized in the service, of few words, many furrows, and some honest

cicatrixs? ( 31 ) . Billy recognizes the old Dansker as a figure of experience, and after demoing regard

and courtesy which Billy believes due to his senior, eventually seeks his advice, but what he is told

exhaustively astonishes him. Red Whiskers tells Billy that for some ground, Claggart is after Billy,

but Billy can non believe it because he is so guiltless and trusting. Through this state of affairs Billy now

discoveries himself in, Melville has us inquire ourselves a inquiry: Would it be right for Billy to mind the

advice of experience and wisdom and state the captain about Claggart? s confederacy? Or should he

alternatively maintain his oral cavity shut and seek to work things out himself?

Bing the good individual that he

is, Billy tries to bury about it and hopes that it will go through,

but it does non. And that is where the 4th of these few characters comes in. Captain Vere,

with his love for cognition and books, and? ? his settled strong beliefs [ which stood ] as a butch

against those occupying Waterss of fresh sentiment, societal, political, and otherwise, which carried

off as in a downpour no few heads in those yearss, heads by nature non inferior to his ain? ( 25-26 ) .

Vere is a adult male who believes in regulations, ordinances, and process. In his sentiment, everything must

be done harmonizing to direction, and divergence from that set manner of thought and operation is

incorrect. This manner of thought is illustrated as Melville commits what he calls a? literary wickedness? :

In this affair of authorship, decide as one may to maintain to the chief route, some

bywaies have an temptation non readily to be withstood. I am traveling to mistake into

such a byway. If the reader will maintain me company I shall be glad. At the least we

can assure ourselves that pleasance which is evilly said to be in sinning, for a

literary sin the divergency will be. ( 20 )

Because of his doctrine, Captain Vere ever strives to make that which he believes to be right

harmonizing to the Torahs set by his superior officers. This is a blunt contrast to Billy, who keeps

quiet when he learns about a confederacy to mutiny among the crew on board.

In the book? s flood tide, Claggart comes to Captain Vere and accuses Billy of cabaling to

mutiny. Billy, so astonished by Claggart? s allegation, strikes him dead with one blow to the caput.

In an attempt to uphold military jurisprudence and ordinance, Captain Vere holds a test in which he

manipulates the loath tribunal into convicting Billy and condemning him to decease. But his decease

was non agonising or Byzantine. It was alternatively, olympian. ? At the same minute it chanced that the

vapory fleece hanging low in the East was shot through with a soft glorification as of the fleece of the

Lamb of God seen in mystical vision, and at the same time therewith, watched by the impacted mass

of overturned faces, Billy ascended, and, go uping, took the full rose of the morning? ( 80 ) . Such glorification

and beauty in decease can merely be achieved by those who are genuinely ready and without sorrow, as Billy

was.

The inquiry, so, is presented. Artlessness or wisdom? Which doctrine, which

manner of life is more right? Claggart, who represents the natural immorality in the universe, serves as the

resistance and corruptness which we face mundane. He is the obstruction that Billy must cover with,

and the manner in which he confronts that obstruction determines which of these replies is the correct

one. Melville, in showing the flood tide of the book, might be proposing that it would hold been

better for Billy to hold chosen the way of experience and wisdom, like old Red Whiskers, for if he

had, he would still be alive. However, I believe that through this allusion to Christ? s crucifixion,

he is demoing us that possibly we should non ever merely be concerned about ourselves, but besides

about those around us. Possibly that through ethical motives and virtuousness, we can lift above the immorality in the

universe and do an impact on the lives of those around us.

The newspaper article near the terminal of the book portrays this absolutely. It brands Billy as a

treasonist, but his shipmates will non hold it so. They kept path of the spar from which he was

hanged until it becomes a? ? mere dock-yard roar. To them a bit of it was as a piece of the

Cross? ( 87 ) . The fable of Billy? s artlessness will non decease, and it changes the lives of the crewmans

everlastingly. I believe Melville is stating that true goodness, aspersed by a Satanic Claggart, and

doomed to decease by a perplexed but unsloped Vere, even dead, is better than all the wisdom and

experience of the universe because it exists after decease, and hence victories.

4

31b