Cloning Essay, Research Paper

Bioethicss, which is the survey of value judgements refering to human behavior in the country of

biological science and includes those related to the pattern of medical specialty, has been an of import facet of

all countries in the scientific field ( Bernstein, Maurice, M.D. ) . It is one of the factors that says

whether or non certain scientific research can travel on, and if it can, under which regulations and

ordinances it must stay by. One of the most recent and controversial issues confronting our society

today is the thought of cloning. On February 23, 1997, Ian Wilmut, a Scots scientist, along with

his co-workers at the Roslin Institute and PPL Therapeutics, announced to the universe that they

had cloned a lamb, which they named Dolly, after Dolly Parton, from an grownup sheep ( Mario,

Christopher ) .

The two portion the same nucleic Deoxyribonucleic acid, but differ in footings of their mitochondrial Deoxyribonucleic acid,

which is vitally of import for the ordinance of the cell. The media and the imperativeness ignored this fact,

and therefore claimed that Dolly and her female parent were genetically indistinguishable, which sparked a rage of

call all around the universe. The technique of reassigning a karyon from a bodily cell into an

egg cell of which the karyon had been removed, called atomic organ transplant, is an extension of

research that had been ongoing for over 40 old ages.

Up until now, scientists thought that grownup cells could non be reprogrammed to act

like a fertilized egg and make an embryo, but the grounds obtained by Dolly s success prove

otherwise. The issues of cloning have been around for a long clip, get downing with the publication of

Joshua Lederberg s 1966 article on cloning in the American Naturalist, and the populaces involvement

has been perked by many sci-fi books, movies, and films including Aldous Huxley s 1932 novel

Brave New World, 1973 s Sleeper, the 1978 movie The Boys from Brazil, and most

late, the film Multiplicity ( Mario, Christopher ) . The ethical, legal, and moral issues

aroused by cloning have been raised by old undertakings, and are now merely emerging once more,

with its focal point on three major points: the displacement from sexual reproduction with that of nonsexual

reproduction of bing cistrons ; the ability to predetermine the cistrons of a kid ; and the ability to

make many genetically indistinguishable kids ( Report/Recommendations of the NBAC ) .

The populace responded to Dolly with a mixture of fright and exhilaration, oppugning the

benefits and the catastrophes that could go on in the hereafter if research was to go on. From a canvass

taken by Maurice Bernstein, M.D. , the consequences showed that 72 % of the ballots said that cloning

should be prohibited by jurisprudence. They believe that cloning for any ground would be an unethical and

immoral thing to make. A common misconception of cloning is that it is the instantaneous creative activity

of a to the full grown grownup from the cells of the person. Besides, that an exact transcript, although much

younger, of an bing individual could be made, reflecting the belief that one s cistrons bear a simple

relationship to the physical and psychological traits that make up a individual. This is one point that

those against cloning are frequently disquieted about. That the ringer would hold no psyche, no head, no

feelings or emotions of their ain, no say in how their life will be with their fate predetermined

for them, and that each single ringer would non be alone. They are besides afraid that the ringer

will non be treated like a individual, more like a worthless 2nd transcript, or a fill-in for what was

at that place but now is lost. Although the cistrons do play an of import portion, its the interaction among a

individual s familial heritage, their environment, memories, different life experiences, and the

procedure of larning that consequence in the singularity of each person ( Mario, Christopher ) .

Peoples think that by cloning, we are taking the creative activity of life into our ain custodies, giving

us all the control over something ne’er earlier in our power, and in kernel playing God

( Mario, Christopher ) . But what they don t realize is that for 100s of old ages, world has

been commanding nature with the domestication of workss and animate beings, which is a misdemeanor of the

natural order of things as God has put them here on Earth. Another point that those against

cloning seem to hold on is the potency of physical injury put upon those involved with the

procedure. First, Dolly was the lone success out of 277 efforts. With worlds, there is the hazard of

hormonal mutants, multiple abortions, and perchance developmental malformations in the kid,

and no 1 knows how many attempts it will take until a ringer is eventually born. But as with all

gestations, the prospective parents are allowed to transport the babe to term, because of the

parent s right to reproductive freedom. But the facet of physical injury is non a apt one,

because there is no manner for us to cognize if the kid will travel through any sort of injury until human

cloning is attempted ( Report/Recommendations of the NBAC ) . One of the basic frights

associated with cloning is eugenics, fundamentally an effort to better the human race. These frights

are based on the visions that one adult male will develop the maestro race of people in order to govern

the universe, as Hitler did with Germany during WWII, that people would clone those considered

perfect to do our society better, and this fright is reinforced through many of the amusing

books, movies, and amusing books go arounding throughout the universe. But this is non a believable fright,

because people s visions of flawlessness vary drastically from one another, and if person did seek

to make a maestro race, it would take many old ages to organize his ground forces of his ringers, and by the

clip they were old plenty to hold any kind of impact on the universe, we would hold alread

Y

figured out what they were seeking to make ( Bernstein, Maurice ) .

The grounds why people are for the idea of cloning are many. They include:

retrieving a loved one ; handling sterility ; megalomania, which is a desire to reproduce one s

ain qualities ; helping medical research ; utilizing the ringer for trim parts ; and even merely for

wonder s sake ( Dixon, Patrick ) . Many think that cloning would be utile in the event of holding

a loved one dice. With the usage of cloning, you could animate that individual and convey them back,

but most likely, the new person would hold a personality different than the 1 in the

memories. Besides, people believe that cloning could handle people with sterility jobs. If a

twosome is unable to reproduce on their ain, with the usage of cloning, they could, in theory, have a

kid that is their ain. People argue though, that the universe is overpopulated as it is, and plus,

God did non intend for us to reproduce that manner. Since we have generative variety meats, we should

utilize them. In the instance of medical research, cloning would assist assistance in happening remedies for fatal and

cancerous unwellnesss. Besides, it would be an of import key in the apprehension of genetic sciences and

development, and in how to pull strings beings. It may besides assist dainty diseases like diabetes,

Parkinson s disease, or even malignant neoplastic diseases of the blood. Cloning can besides state us about the ripening

procedure, and the function of telomeres in aging ( Encarta ) . A point closely associated with the idea

of utilizing cloning for medical research is of cloning people for trim parts. Many people believe

this would be a good thought because you ll ever have what you need, such as bone marrow, or

a kidney in instance of a demand for a graft, that will be indistinguishable to the 1 that is needed. But

those against cloning argue that this is a misdemeanor of one of the many rights given to persons.

Better yet, would be the ability to clone a bosom, or any of the other variety meats from the cells, so this

manner, the rights of the person would non be violated ( Bruce, Donald ) .

The moralss environing the issue of cloning are many, and it will be many old ages before a

concluding determination on whether or non cloning will be considered ethical or non. Personally, I believe

that worlds should non be cloned. It seems incorrect for people to hold the same cistrons, to be

precisely likewise in expressions, merely because the parent wanted the child to look that manner. It does go on in

the instance of indistinguishable twins and threes, but that is from a work of God, and in considered a

miracle, but when this happens by cloning, it is no longer a miracle, it is an point that is man-

made. In most instances, I believe that utilizing cloning for trim parts would be a positive thing, if the

ringer was non made to be a existent individual. If the lone thing that came out of the cloning was the

portion that needed to be used for a serious unwellness or for a graft, so I would see that to

be ethical, because you are salvaging a individual s life, without taking one in return. Furthermore, I

Don T believe in the theory of eugenics. The thought of person who believes that he could make a

maestro race of his cloned ego is wholly impossible to me, and the thought of the perfect race full

of perfect people could ne’er in actuality exist, because of the fact that flawlessness is in the oculus of

the perceiver. What symbolizes flawlessness to one individual, could be considered a major defect in

another.

The best usage of cloning, in my sentiment, would be to utilize it to assist contend off hungriness and

famishment. Scientists should set all the new information from what they have learned from Dolly

to clone workss and animate beings so that people in other portion of the universe who are hungry, could

eventually have something to eat. Furthermore, I believe that it would be a good thought to clone those

animate beings and workss that are in hazard of extinction. This would assist their species survive and

hopefully end extinction of many of the beautiful workss and animate beings that were one time plentiful on

this Earth.

Cloning BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Bernstein, Maurice M.D. Cloning of Humans. Feburary 27, 1997. hypertext transfer protocol: //www-

hsc.usc.edu/ mbernste/

2. Bernstein, Maurice M.D. -The Ethical Issue- Cloning of Humans: Will it be Ethical? Should it

be Done? hypertext transfer protocol: //www-usc.usc.edu/ mbernste/ethics.cloninghumnas.html

3. Bernstein, Maurice M.D. Subject

4: Poll Results. hypertext transfer protocol: //www-usc.usc.edu/ mbernste/index.htm # Topic 4

4. Dr. Dixon, Patrick. Life after Dolly & # 8211 ; Human Cloning

hypertext transfer protocol: //people.delphi.com/patrickdixon/clonech.htm

5. Dr. Dixon, Patrick. Headless Human Clones will Turn Organs in 10 Old ages. October 19,

1992. hypertext transfer protocol: //people.delphi.com/patrickdixon.frogs.htm

6. Voice of America. The Ethics of Cloning. March 13, 1997.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.kaiwan.com/ mcivr/clon19.html

7. Voice of America. Britain/Cloning/Ethics. February 25, 1997

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.kaiwan.com/ mcivr/cloning2.html

8. Dr. Bruce, Donald. Society, Religion and Technology Project. Church of Scotland. Cloning

Animals and Worlds, May 27, 1997 hypertext transfer protocol: //webzone1.co.uk/www/srtproject/ga97clon.htm

9. Why Ringer?

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.encarta.com/explore/yearbook/archive/may97/cloning/ybfeatur/asp 10. Mario,

Christopher. U.S. 1 Newspaper. A Spark of Science, a Storm of Controversy. March 5,

1997. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.princetoninfo.com/clone.html

11. Dr. Bruce, Donald. Cloning & # 8211 ; How Should Society Decide?

hypertext transfer protocol: //webzone1.co.uk/www/srtproject/clonres.htm

12. Dr. Bruce, Donald. Should We Clone Humans?

hypertext transfer protocol //webzone1.co.uk/www/srtproject/clonhum1.htm

13. Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory

Commission. Rockville, Maryland. June 1997 hypertext transfer protocol: //www/berzerk.com/acro/mime.acro