Cloning Essay, Research Paper
The Case against Cloning
When I foremost began this essay, I held no stance on the topic of human cloning. After my initial research, I came to the decision that there was no existent grounds that human cloning should be illegal. My first bill of exchange nevertheless lacked good statements. I & # 8217 ; ve since returned to the library and took a new expression at the job. And, after more research my stance was changed. Human cloning, while conveying some good, is non God & # 8217 ; s will, and any God fearing homo should see human cloning wrong.
There are many good grounds why human cloning should non be outlawed. Parents unable to hold kids could clone themselves. & # 8220 ; If and when human cloning becomes possible, it will stand for little more than another measure in generative engineering and one that persons would be free to take if they desire & # 8221 ; ( Hines ) . The kids, being familial reproduction of the parents, would be true offspring. This would soothe the parents in the fact that they truly lived on through their kids. This engineering could besides convey great things to the medical universe. & # 8220 ; The engineering of cloning may good let biotechnologists to develop animate beings which will turn human-compatible variety meats for graft. Cloning is likely to be foremost used to make animate beings that produce valuable curative endocrines, enzymes, and proteins & # 8221 ; ( Bailey 2 ) . These progresss could salvage many human lives, all through cloning. The cloning of worlds could besides be applied to endangered animate beings. & # 8220 ; Cloning something every bit nonextant as the stars of Jurassic Park remains fiction, but Lanza has merely received permission from Spain to clone the bucardo, a mountain caprine animal that became nonextant when a tree fell on & # 8216 ; Celia, & # 8217 ; the last of its sort. The tissue was frozen ; if it can be cloned in the egg of a common ibex, the bucardo would populate once more. & # 8216 ; We hope to hold unrecorded bucardo childs by early summer, & # 8217 ; says Lanza & # 8221 ; ( Begley 3 ) . We could take action against the deceases of whole species. This engineering could turn the universe on its caput. However, merely like trial tubing babes were denounced in the 60 & # 8217 ; s, we now do the same with cloning. Before the engineering has even entered the door, we ask it to go forth by non merely censoring the thought but any research on it. Nevertheless, with adequate research these things could be a world in the hereafter. A world that would genuinely do the universe a better topographic point.
I must acknowledge that about all the statements against human cloning are really weak. What if Hitler was cloned or an ground forces of Hilters, others go every bit far as to state that cloning would make a sub category of citizens. These nevertheless, are narratives of scientific discipline fiction. It could go on
pen, but non truly. To go genuinely similar Hitler, a ringer would non merely hold to be a familial reproduction but besides experience the same things. Our familial codification is merely the beginning of who we are. Our environment adds merely every bit much. A ringer of Hitler would hold to turn up in the same exact manner. In add-on, what factors would convert a individual that ringers are any less human existences? When familial reproduction, or indistinguishable twins, are born, one is non considered more human than the other is. A ringer would be considered merely every bit human as any other would, because they are. It may seam like I’m reasoning against myself, but there is one statement that stands above all the remainder.
& # 8220 ; But at the beginning of creative activity God & # 8216 ; made them male and female & # 8217 ; & # 8216 ; For this ground a adult male will go forth his male parent and female parent and be united to his married woman, and the two will go one flesh, & # 8217 ; So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, allow adult male non separate & # 8221 ; ( New International Version, Mark.10.6-9 ) . These are the direct words of Jesus to the Pharisees. Clearly, this transition from the Word of God shows that he intended male and female to reproduce. With cloning nevertheless, this is non needed. A adult female could clone herself and transport the kid until birth. Furthermore, this girl could make the same, transporting on for coevalss. Where is the adult male, he is non needed. Through cloning, we can divide what God has put together, and disobey his direct bid.
While cloning would give medical benefits and perchance do the universe a better topographic point. God has clearly commanded us that this is non his will. We must listen, and obey, non merely for ourselves but besides for the hereafter of the universe. God gives his bids non to impede our lives, or do it hard to populate. Commands are given to protect us from ourselves. AIDS would be rather harmless if the 7th commandment was obeyed to some extent. Therefore, we must obey, and maintain from cloning. What cloning will convey to the universe I truly don & # 8217 ; t cognize? Nevertheless, I trust the Lord and his word.
Plants Cited
Bailey, Ronald. & # 8220 ; The twin paradox: what precisely is incorrect with cloning people? & # 8221 ;
Reason May 1997: 52-54.
Begley, Sharon. & # 8220 ; Cloning the Endangered. & # 8221 ; Newsweek 16 Oct. 2000: 56
Hines, Terence. & # 8220 ; Clear Thinking About Human Cloning. & # 8221 ; Skeptical Inquirer
Nov. 1999: 57
Bailey, Ronald. & # 8220 ; The twin paradox: what precisely is incorrect with cloning people? & # 8221 ;
Reason May 1997: 52-54.
Begley, Sharon. & # 8220 ; Cloning the Endangered. & # 8221 ; Newsweek 16 Oct. 2000: 56
Hines, Terence. & # 8220 ; Clear Thinking About Human Cloning. & # 8221 ; Skeptical Inquirer
Nov. 1999: 57
