Philosophers live and encourage others to populate harmonizing to the regulations of practical wisdom. Aristotle. Immanuel Kant. and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out assorted ethical attacks. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to make. For case. Aristotle contemplated the purpose of human life. Kant observed responsibility and duty from regard for the jurisprudence. and Levinas examined one’s duty to the Other. These alone points of position offer different replies sing the hunt for the good.
In add-on to their differences. these philosophers are bound together by similar thoughts. For illustration. each of the philosophers believed in optimism– they thought that all worlds are of course ethical. In add-on. each of the philosophers believed in utilizing ground to be ethical. They emphasized the construct of life well and moving good by utilizing virtuous wonts and good character to make the “good” . Furthermore. they all believed in ego actualization– in other words. ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical individual must be rational and responsible for their actions.
They proposed that each individual has a responsibility towards others and society. Aristotle lived during the B. C. epoch and established the construct of teleological moralss. This means that moralss has a intent or a ground. He stressed the construct of philosophy of the mean– keeping balance in one’s actions. Additionally. he theorized the thought of developing virtuous wonts to construct good character every bit good as that felicity is the chief end of all human existences. He explained how making one’s possible by populating good and moving good will finally take to happiness.
Furthermore. he stated one should establish one’s actions on ground and he introduced the construct that ground controls desire. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the bulk his life in the 1700’s. He believed that an person should utilize God. freedom. and immortality to be able to prosecute and achieve the supreme good. He besides believed in deontological moralss. intending it is one’s duty and responsibility to make what is right. Kant said that an person must utilize mind. free will. and ground to transport out this responsibility.
He is similar to Aristotle because likewise. he believed that it is ideal for all people to move in an ethical mode by utilizing ground. However. unlike Aristotle. Kant believed one must move ethically as an single liberty for the good of society.
He said that one must utilize ground and free will to transport out one’s responsibility and moral duty to make good. He stressed the construct of non anticipating to derive anything in return while executing ethical tasks– even though one might non wish it– one should move ethically out of the goodness in one’s bosom. On the other manus. Aristotle believed one should move ethically as portion of a community– based on political relations. He besides expected a benefit in return. contrary to Kant.
Aristotle said that it is ideal to accomplish a sensible agency in moralss. and he expected to derive something– like felicity for instance– in return. Besides. contrary to Aristotle’s theory. Kant’s theory proposes that it is non really possible to accomplish the supreme good in one’s life-time. He suggested that worlds must accomplish this good in a life after decease. This proves that their theories sing how to accomplish the supreme good differ well. Emmanuel Levinas was a Judaic philosopher of the twentieth century. He observed that the West focused on the Unity of Beings. non the Hebrew eternity.
The Hebrew Infinity focuses on singularity and uniqueness of things which gives them individuality. Levinas based his moralss on this construct. Levinas believed one encounters the good or God in all persons or in creative activity. He said one needs to acknowledge these hints. accept them. and respond to them. He talked about the bang of amazement. which is a face to confront experience that touches one deeply. Additionally. he suggested that the face of the alien ( the Other ) demands that you recognize it and supply it cordial reception. Therefore. the face becomes ethical. He had this whole thought of advancing freedom instead than restricting it.
He believed that the face is a “trace of God” that refuses to utilize power. Alternatively. the face calls one to be responsible by meekly waving those that passes by. Kant besides had similar theories as Levinas because both of them emphasized that God is necessary for a individual to move ethically. In other words. they included God in their hunt for the good. Kant believed one can non make this without God. whereas Levinas believed worlds are motivated by God to make good. With the construct of the Other. Levinas suggested that worlds have a duty to react with lovingness and compassion.
Similarly. Kant besides believed in lovingness and compassion because he believed in the Universal Law– if it is an act that is good for everyone. so it is good for an person. It is apparent that Aristotle. Immanuel Kant. and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out assorted ethical attacks that aided them in their hunt for the good. Despite the fact that they have several similar theories. each philosopher has many alone theories that will go on to assist future coevalss learn to populate ethically and to finally accomplish the greater good.
