Compare and Contrast ancient India and Egypt combined political relations and faith Through history. faith has shaped civilisations in several facets. In ancient Indian and Egyptian civilisations it was really strong determining force in political constructions. but both the spiritual beliefs and the ensuing political system were different. merely like Pharaohs were different from rajas. The manner Egyptians and Indians blended faith with political relations bears certain similarities. First of all. the cardinal function of priests. who were the Egyptians pharaohs most of import advisers during the New Kingdom and at one point gained more power than the Pharaoh himself.
In the other manus. in India priests or Brahmans were besides of import political figures since they were considered to be at the top of the caste system and comprised the most educated part of society. Besides. in both civilisations faith became a manner to reenforce the authorities and lead volunteers to work during the summers to construct the celebrated Egyptian pyramids. In India. on the other manus. the caste system and the construct of Dharma taught the lower categories what their topographic point in society. and this topographic point was subordinated to the upper categories and the authorities.
Despite the similarities the influence of faith in the political life of both ancient civilisations displays some differences. For illustration. the Pharaoh was considered a godly swayer. doing him a taking priest. while rajas were military figures and even after the rise of the caste system warriors confined with priests for power. Even Ashoka. the emperor of India who became a Buddhist monastic. was non godly. eventhough his authorities gave Buddhism cardinal importance.
Here. we can see yet another difference that started with the outgrowth of Buddhism and Jainism in India. while in India more than one faith ( with Ashoka ) while the Hindu caste system was still in pattern. Egypt merely had one cardinal system of beliefs at a clip. Even though the signifier of worship and the beliefs changed over clip. merely one spiritual system held power at a clip. even during the short period during which the Pharaoh became monotheistic with Akhenaton and the worship of Aton. merely this system held political power even if the people still worship the old Gods.
Because of this. priests and Lords overthrew this spiritual system in Egypt and regained their power. Even though faith was an of import portion of the Indian political system. neither rajas nor ulterior emperors established a theocracy. while the Egyptian Pharaoh did. In Egypt the Pharaoh were spiritual and political figures. in fact. during the New Kingdom they had no standing ground forces. while Rajas were warriors and the authorization of Indian emperors besides derived from military power. This is due because Egyptian civilisation was peaceful through most of its history. so faith. instead tan an ground forces was used to warrant the Pharaoh regulation.
In India. on the other manus. Indo-european folks spread through war. and the Indian imperium was established by subverting the Macedonians through military conquering. So in both the places of the Raja and the emperor were sustained by their ability to suppress and subdue others. even during the reign of Asoka diplomatic negotiations was used to spread out the imperiums domains. As we can see. faith in India and Egypt became a factor of importance. but in clearly different ways and giving different constructions and interactions.
The spiritual and political constructions of both ancient civilisations can be related to the Nipponese authorization of Eden. This comparing can be made because in India and Egypt the leaders shared both spiritual and political authorization ; they were the supreme leaders in both facets. In the authorization of Heaven Japanese political swayers. were supposed to be enlightened or chosen by God to govern the imperium. In decision the three civilisations had swayers in which were germinate both political and sacredly.
