Declaration Of Individualism Essay, Research Paper
The Declaration of Individualism and The Encouragement of Protest from Birmingham
Jail
Although the clip periods and ends may be different the method for
conveying about alteration is normally the same, this method is protest. ? ? This method
is supported by two different people, in two different clip periods, with two
different ends ; these two people are Thomas Jefferson and Martin Luther King
Junior.
Martin Luther King Junior & # 8217 ; s missive from Birmingham Jail was an
look of his encouragement for protest against tradition and established
Torahs and a justification for his actions. ? ? King, a leader of a civil-rights
group that supported protest against traditional positions, encouraged protesting
against tradition and established Torahs that are unjust. ? In his missive from
Birmingham Jail King provinces:
& # 8220 ; It was illegal to assistance and comfort a Jew in Hitler & # 8217 ; s Germany. ? Even so, I am
sure that, had I lived in Germany at that clip, I would hold aided and comforted
my Judaic brothers. ? If today I lived in a Communist state where certain
rules dear to the Christian religion are suppressed, I would openly recommend
disobeying that state & # 8217 ; s anti-religious laws. & # 8221 ;
This extract shows that King encourages protest because in some state of affairss he
deems it necessary, be it in Hitler & # 8217 ; s Germany, a Communist state, or any
state of affairs in which unfairnesss are occurring. ? In the last sentence of the
extract King openly admits that he would protest against established Torahs or
traditions. ? King was against the traditional positions and unfair Torahs, which
discriminated against him and his fellow people. ? He felt that the lone manner that
these unfair Torahs and traditional beliefs would of all time alter would be by agencies
of protest. ? He felt that without protest the Torahs and traditions would stay
the same forever. ? Along with encouraging protest, King & # 8217 ; s missive was besides a
justification of his actions. ? The missive was written to his fellow reverends to
explicate his anterior actions and to try to warrant them. ? In the missive he
tried to explicate to the clergy that his actions although illegal were justified
and allow for the situation. ? He expressed that he exhausted every other
option possible and direct action was the lone available option left, which
could do a difference.
Similarly to King & # 8217 ; s missive from Birmingham Jail, The Declaration of
Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson to promote the protest of
established Torahs and justify possible actions. ? But unlike King, Jefferson besides
encouraged individuality in his declaration. ? His positions are clearly stated in
the
first sentence of The Declaration of Independence:
& # 8220 ; When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
fade out the political sets which have connected them with another, and to
presume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station to which
the Laws of Nature and the Laws of God entitle them, a nice regard to the
sentiments of world requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to separation. & # 8221 ;
In this individual sentence Jefferson states his support for the encouragement of
individuality and the demand for protest against established Torahs. The
declaration was written to convey approximately integrity to our nation. ? Even though it was
meant to convey integrity and similarity as a group it still encouraged individuality,
merely on a larger scale. ? The papers states that we, the full state, need
to unify to go an single offprint from England. ? Jefferson feels that it
is in the class of human event for individuality to happen, and that without
individuality alteration would ne’er occur. ? The full papers is fundamentally a
declaration of individualism. ? & # 8220 ; The Declaration of Independence & # 8221 ; , along with the
encouragement individuality supports the protest against established laws. ? The
Torahs of England were the established Torahs at the clip prior to the authorship of
the declaration, and Jefferson felt that everyone should hold the right protest
against any Torahs that they feel are unfair no affair how good established they
may be. ? Throughout the full declaration Jefferson states how he, and the
bulk of the state, felt that the established Torahs of the clip were unfair
and deserved protest. Jefferson & # 8217 ; s view on protest is clear in one particular
sentence of the declaration, & # 8220 ; whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive to these terminals, it is the Right of the People to change or to get rid of
it & # 8221 ; . ? Since the Torahs of the clip were thought to be unfair, protest was
appropriate and good justified in Jefferson & # 8217 ; s eyes. ? Jefferson stated multiple
grounds to warrant his position that the settlements needed to divide from England. ?
This papers was non merely intend to convey about individuality and protest, but
warrant the future action that would happen to accomplish it. ? ? Martin Luther
King Jr. and Thomas Jefferson were both leaders of revolutions, and though each
revolution was immensely different, they believed in the thought that alteration would non
occur unless it was forced along. ? They believed that alteration among established
Torahs and traditions could merely happen through protest. ? Two different work forces, about
two hundred old ages apart, with two different ends, and about indistinguishable methods
of accomplishing their ends