Marriage is regarded as a sacred brotherhood between adult male and a adult female. and the household founded on matrimony is recognized as a font of love. protection and attention ; therefore it must be cherished and must last everlastingly. Nonetheless. when everything is broken. and many cryings were shed. all ends into divorce. Divorce is the concluding expiration of a matrimonial brotherhood. call offing the legal responsibilities and duties of matrimony and fade outing the bonds of marriage between the parties ( unlike revocation. which declares the matrimony nothing and nothingness ) . Divorce Torahs vary well around the universe. but in most states it requires the countenance of a tribunal or other authorization in a legal procedure. The ground that gave me impulse to prosecute this subject is my understanding to the kids that will acquire left behind. This study showcases the different positions of some people towards this subject.

“Divorce is a declaration of independency with merely two signers. – Gerard Lieberman

The inquiry I am postulating goes like this:

“Pipirma Ka Ba? ”

Peoples have different positions and sentiments refering this subject. There are those who are in favour of divorce and those who are non in favour of divorce. The 3rd will be those who are impersonal.

I asked several pupils about their base on divorce. The following are the remarks of some anti-divorce people:

Harmonizing to Jerome Canonizado. 1st twelvemonth pupil of Mapua Institute of Technology. why would people trouble oneself themselves for a matrimony if they will merely give themselves pester and fuss in covering with divorce documents? Canonizado is connoting that he is connoting that he isn’t in favour with divorce.

Another remark from Sorell Angeles. a first-year pupil in Ateneo de Manila University. said no for he believes that matrimony is a lifetime determination that’s why taking the right spouse should be taken earnestly. He every bit good added that with divorce. the holiness and sanctity of matrimony will be easy broken by those who will non be serious for this mode.

Other respondents like Julius Rodriguez of Mapua. and John De Asis of Ateneo. stressed out the vows and promises renounced by the twosome during the matrimony. They are stating that after all these vows and promises. why would a couple terminal up registering divorce documents with each other? They are implicitly stating that their base for this topic is against divorce.

In add-on with these anti-divorce people above. another anti-divorce individual in the name of Bernadette Senado. a cell group wise man and a instructor gave her sentiment as respects to disassociate. She said that in this twenty-four hours and age. most relationships are consequences of people’s emotional urges. Because of these. people were blinded and were non able to do right determinations and picks. and take the right spouse. All in all. in any angle. harmonizing to her. there’s no beauty in divorce.

Now. the following are the remarks of the pro-divorce people:

Arnold Justin Mejia Rull. a occupant of Marikina metropolis. commented that he is a pro-divorce. His reply was based on a certain state of affairs in a relationship. Harmonizing to him. he would decidedly register a divorce instance one time gets battered.

Another pro-divorce individual would be Alec Baluyot. a 1st twelvemonth pupil of Mapua. For him. when the clip comes where the familiarity and flicker between a twosome no longer exists. he will register a divorce. This would forestall more amendss caused by the wrangles and battles of the twosome. which would greatly give an impact to their kids.

At this clip. the following are the scrutinizations made by the people whose base on this affair is impersonal.

For John Roel Yerro. a first-year pupil of Ateneo de Manila University. his determination for this capable depends on the state of affairs undergone by a twosome. What is more of import for him is the proper and efficient direction of a relationship between twosomes.

Another pupil from Ateneo. in the individual of Benro Balaoing. stated his base for this issue. Harmonizing to him. presents. we’re in a state of affairs where in what is needed are the security of life and the saving of the award and self-respect of each person in our state. The kids are the 1s greatly affected by this issue. In add-on to that. he said that alternatively of reprobating a twosome for doing a incorrect determination. he said that what is more of import is the options we can supply for them to be freed out of such flagitious state of affairss.

As shown in this paper. people have different bases on divorce. In the terminal. though. the surefire manner to avoid this tragic stoping is consciousness: consciousness of yourself. consciousness of your relationship. and consciousness of the public assistance of the kids. As for me. I don’t hold my ain house base right now. With that I’m neither stating that I’m wholly opposing divorce nor approbating with it. Actually. I’m slightly in favour with the passing of the measure. Divorce would be auspicious for me when done in a complete and systematic manner. With systematic and complete. I mean. all documents are reviewed good. the side of the both parties are good heard. in short. everything is analyzed stupendously. On the other manus. I would wish. every bit much as possible. to forestall the filing of divorce instances. I honor the holiness and sanctity of matrimony. and believe its life-time prominence to a twosome. that’s why it should be preserved. maintained. and kept until the last breath of the twosome.

Prior to our cognition. the Philippines had been colonized by the Spaniards for about 300 old ages. For this ground. Catholicity. brought by these colonisers in our state. has a great influence to the province. The Filipino individuality which is largely expressed in this affair is their complete and pious devotedness to the Roman Catholic Church and its beliefs since Filipinos. as stated earlier. were greatly influenced by the faith brought by Spaniards. In position of the fact that the Catholic Church believes that matrimony is a lifetime partnership and committedness between twosomes. it can be said that the church does non agree with the construct of divorce. This may be proved by the absence of divorce here in the Philippines. Merely revocation is passed out in our state.

The statements that I like the most are:

The responses that I dislike are:

———————–
I like his statement because we have the same base and it doesn’t show any prejudice.

I besides favor this response because this reply is really oculus catching plus it’s composing & A ; construction is brilliant.

I dislike this for responses are irrelevant.

Merely God holds and knows our hereafter.

Marriage couldn’t be dash with that ground and there is a bigger opportunity that the kids could be more affected when their parents are separated.

I besides dislike this because we. worlds must cognize what is right and incorrect.