Drug Testing Essay, Research Paper
Although many people think that drug testing is a nuscience, it is essentialto
better the workplace. Seventy-four per centum of all drug users are employed, and
one out of every six has a serious drug job! Would you desire them working
for you? Plus, the fiscal impact on concern is badly astonishing because
of drug utilizing employees ( Psychemedics, 1 ) .
Harmonizing to federal experts, ten to 23 per centum of Americans
hold used or presently utilizing unsafe drugs while on the occupation, and forty-four
per centum of drug users even admit to selling drugs on the occupation. Drug maltreaters cost
an
employer on mean $ 7,000 to $ 10,000 per employee yearly ( Jussim, 14 )
( Psychemedics,1 ) . Today, 1000000s of workplaces have begun giving trial, trusting
to extinguish drugs from the employees and the workplace. The bulk of drug
testing is done in big mills and offices or on people who transport goods
,
such as by truck or plane ( Jussim, 11 ) . The big companies that use proving
today
is Exxon, IBM, Federal Express, United Airlines, AT & A ; T and the New York Times
( Jussim, 12 ) . The trials normally look for drugs such as cocaine, marihuana, diacetylmorphine,
PCP, barbiturates and pep pills ( Jussim, 11 ) . In most companies appliers
using for new occupations that trial positive are given a 2nd opportunity to use
( Jussim,
13 ) . About 68 per centum of companies do compulsory showings before they
engage a individual, such as if they were a campaigner for the occupation, instead than portion
of their
application. A assortment of trial can be given. About 82 per centum of
companies use urine trial, the most popular because they are cheap. Twelve
per centum use the blood trial for an even more accurate reading. Hair testing is
used
by about one per centum of companies. This method is one of the most accurate trials
because it can observe any drug used in the past 90 yearss ( 1994, 1 ) , this
trial is
used by about 1,700 corporations entirely ( Psychemedics, 5 ) . Merely about one
per centum usage public presentation proving, such as walking in a consecutive line or holding
a
individual touch his olfactory organ with his finger ( 1994, 1 ) .
Employers claim that workers who use drugs have lower productiveness rates
and an increased figure of yearss missed, 16 times more to be exact. As good,
they are at a greater hazard of acquiring themselves injured or wounding a colleague
( Jussim, 13 ) . When this happens it is bad for the company because it may hold
a
case filed against them, bing the company even more money ( Jussim, 14 ) .
Furthermore, lost productiveness by drug users costs concern an estimated
one-hundred billion dollars each twelvemonth, because they are one-third less productive
that other workers ( Hospitals,1 ) ( Psychemedics, 1 ) . Workers who use drugs besides
do more medical claims than others ( Jussim, 13 ) . In fact, they cost their
employer 300 per centum more in medical costs and benefits than non drug utilizing
employees ( Psychemedics, 1 ) . Therefore, they drive up the premiums of wellness
insurance paid for by the company ( Jussim, 13 ) . In add-on, it is a proven
fact that
drug nuts are more likely to rip off their companies or even steal from them,
which 18 per centum admitted making ( Jussim, 14 ) ( Psychemedics, 1 ) .
The per centum of workplaces that give drug trials rose from about
85 per centum to 88 per centum in merely one twelvemonth entirely. The figure
of
trials given has risen 300 per centum in a 10 twelvemonth period ( 1994, 1 ) . Since companies
have started utilizing trials they say that they have seen a major betterment in
work
quality, subject and employee morale ( Jussim, 15 ) .
Second, drug proving promotes better wellness for all people. Increasing the
figure of drug trials in the U.S. will give possible drug users a really good
ground
non to get down utilizing them. Since drug trials are going cheaper and more common,
people are get downing to put in them more ( Jussim,11 ) . The trials that are presently
done today are include uranalysis and bloodanalyze, along with trials on hair,
spit,
encephalon moving ridges, breathe, and some even maintain it every bit simple as to walk a line ( Jussim,
12 ) . As the engineering increases in this universe so does the truth of the tools
we use. In the hereafter, it can be assumed that the drug trials will decrease most
drug
usage.
Equally shortly as drug testing was introduced, the use of drugs and the positive
trial rate began falling steadily ( 1994, 1 ) . The fright of being caught is a major
hindrance for non utilizing drugs. Peoples know that if they use drugs now, they
hold a
lesser opportunity of acquiring a good, high paying occupation in the hereafter. Not merely is
drug
proving being given to empl
oyees, but is besides being given to pupils, captives
and
arrestees ( Jussim, 13 ) . This is likely a good thought because drug use hinders
the advancement of a pupils larning.
Now yearss people argue that drug testing is a misdemeanor of privateness, but those
people Dons? T know the true effects of drug usage ( Buddy, 1 ) . The people who are
giving the trials are trusting that the individual being tested is clean because they
privation
him healthy so he is non at hazard for himself or others ( Jussim, 15 ) . Furthermore,
they besides claim the trials are non just because they monitor the employees? off
responsibility
activities, and they believe that is their ain concern ( Jussim, 13 ) . However,
as
long as a individual is employed by a company, that has the right to maintain checking
in
on a individual to do certain he is non seting himself or others at hazard. Plus,
it is
cheaper for the company to give the trials than to hold workers that are high
on
drugs and non doing much advancement ( Psychemedics, 5 ) . In add-on, there is
no
better illustration of caring for a individual? s wellness than parents giving their kids
these trials. Parents wear? T want to hold their kids harm themselves in any
manner,
and they merely want to make what is right and the best for them ( Jussim, 13 ) . Not
many parents give place drug trials, alternatively most of the testing goes on in clinics
and other intervention centres ( Jussim, 11 ) .
Peoples still argue that drug testing is unjust because they say it is
inaccurate, it makes them prove they? re utilizing drugs and a individual should be
guiltless until proved guilty ( Buddy,1 ) ( Jussim, 16 ) . This doesn? Ts make sense
because if the trial is really inaccurate, the individual can revoke it and take
another
trial. As for the inexperienced person until proved guilty theory, it is a individuals pick
to take
the trial, but if he refuses he might non hold a occupation. It is the employer? s right
to
cognize if a individual is presently capable of finishing the undertakings that are needed.
If
the individual is non able to he is bing the company money and seting everyone
in
danger.
Last, drug testing must be done because it promotes a better society for
everyone. By utilizing these trials, more people will believe twice about utilizing drugs.
They know that drug usage may maintain them from acquiring the occupation they dream of.
There is evedence that this is working, for it is known that the figure of people
that usage drugs is on a steady diminution. By detouring people off from drug usage
we
can do a safer, more perfect society.
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act
was passed by Congress in1996. This act authorizes provinces to enforce compulsory
drug testing on all public assistance receivers. Then in 1999 the Michigan province
legislative assembly passed a measure that required public assistance receivers to subject monthly
piss
trials to see if they are utilizing drugs. If they refuse to give the piss samples
their
benefits will be denied, and if they continue to decline to take the trials,
their
benefits will be terminated. Experts say that the incidents of drug usage among
public assistance receivers is about the same as the general populace, but the province doesn? T
desire the money they give them to travel to the purchase of drugs. Today the merely
province making this is Michigan, but experts hope that the tendency will catch on
in others
provinces.
In Charleston, South Carolina, a infirmary, in cooperation with the local
constabulary section, requires that wellness attention suppliers give positive drug trial
consequences of pregnant adult female to the constabulary. While it is non unusual for Torahs to
require
wellness attention suppliers to describe grounds of kid maltreatment, this construct is non
normally
applied to pregnant adult females who abuse their foetuss by taking illegal street drugs.
This is a reasonably good thought for the most portion, but utilizing this method might frighten
adult female who use drugs from traveling to the physician or any wellness attention suppliers. This
could perchance harm the kid even more. This instance is now in the Supreme Court
to see if it qualifies under the hunt and ictus or favoritism Torahs in
the
Fundamental law of the United States ( Gould, 1 ) .
Furthermore, Major League Baseball, the National Football League and
several other athletics organisations, both professional and recreational, have teamed
up
to check down on participants that use illegal drugs. They are following the illustration
set by the Olympic Games. If a participant trials positive for utilizing drugs he is normally
suspended for a few games and given a all right, but in the Olympics jocks who
usage
drugs are non allowed to vie and are a shame to the state ( Jussim,
12 ) .
