Drugs And Alcohol Essay, Research Paper
Imagine a thirteen-year-old male child life with his female parent. His parents have been
divorced since he was four-years-old. He has ne’er truly known his male parent
and therefore uses his friends for his male function theoretical accounts. His female parent has to work
two occupations to back up her household and is hence non at that place to pass much clip
with her kid. This is the type of kid that is usually delinquent. Add to this
scenario a group of teenage friends that are involved in delinquent activities and
it is about guaranteed that a juvenile delinquent will emerge out of this
state of affairs. In an interview that I conducted with a juvenile corrections officer
this scenario was seen as one of the biggest causes of juvenile delinquency.
He, Mike Smith, said that: The three chief causes of juvenile delinquency are
male parents non being in the place, kids being unsupervised, and kid maltreatment.
This is because kids learn through mold, or what they see, so if there is
non a strong, good function theoretical account, they learn through their equals. ( 1999 ) One of the
biggest jobs of juvenile delinquents, or one of their biggest beginnings of
delinquency, harmonizing to Mike Smith is, & # 8220 ; without a uncertainty, ? drugs and intoxicant.
These are normally the things that lead to other delinquent Acts of the Apostless such as jumping
school, stealing, and Acts of the Apostless of force and devastation ( 1999 ) . & # 8221 ; The lone manner
that these jobs can of all time be solved is by everyone working together to
do a difference in every kid? s life. Harmonizing to Smith, rectifying the
job of juvenile delinquency, & # 8220 ; Would affect alterations from the person
degree all the manner up to the social degree ( 1999 ) . & # 8221 ; This would intend that
plans such as the Big Brother Program would be good plans to put in
in individual parent households. The lone job with this is that kids do non necessitate
merely a male and female function theoretical account in their life ; they need a good male and
female function theoretical account in their life. In this instance it is non measure of function theoretical accounts it is
the quality of function theoretical accounts in an person? s life. The chief theory that best
supports this interview is Hirschi? s societal bond theory. This theory suggests that
there are four elements of adhering that & # 8220 ; tie the person to conventional
society and therefore prevent delinquency ( Bynum and Thompson, 1999: 193 ) . & # 8221 ;
These elements are: fond regard, committedness, engagement, and belief.
Harmonizing to this theory, if all four elements are present in an person the
person will non perpetrate delinquent Acts of the Apostless. Yet if an person lacks even one of
these elements, that person has a higher likeliness of perpetrating delinquent
Acts of the Apostless. Hirschi said that there is big fluctuation among persons in the sum
of fond regard, committedness, engagement, and belief in conventional behaviour
and hence there is variableness in their ability to defy pervert and delinquent
behavior ( Bynum and Thompson, 1999: 193 ) . & # 8220 ; He said that delinquents tend to
hold comparatively weak societal bonds and accordingly experience small compunction for
go againsting by and large accepted societal criterions ( Bynum and Thompson ) . & # 8221 ; The
findings in a survey of four-thousand young persons conducted in the metropoliss of Denver,
Pittsburgh, and Rochester gave five causes of juvenile delinquency. This
study sampled young persons at high hazard for serious delinquency and drug usage and
found that: ( 1 ) The more earnestly involved in drugs a young person was, the more
earnestly that juvenile was involved in delinquency, ( 2 ) greater hazards exist for
violent piquing when a kid is physically abused or neglected in early life, ( 3 )
pupils who we
rhenium non committed to school had higher rates of delinquency, ( 4 )
hapless household life exacerbates delinquency and drug usage, and ( 5 ) association with
street packs and illegal gun ownership are both prognostic of delinquency.
( Schmallenger, 1997: 532 ) These five causes that are listed in the survey are
about precisely what the individual that I interviewed said were the causes of
juvenile delinquency. The lone fluctuation in what Smith said and what the survey
found is that my interviewee left out engagement in packs and engagement in
school. These two elements are really of import in the causing of juvenile
delinquency. Gangs are of import because of the strong sum of equal
force per unit area involved in gang life. For some packs, induction involves some type of
condemnable act, such as shrinkage or robbery. There is besides the added factor of
drug usage and drug distribution for some packs. Engagement with school is besides
really of import because a non-delinquent kid? s twenty-four hours normally involves seven to
eight hours of schooling. Whereas a juvenile who is delinquent is normally either
non in school, or they are in school, but acquiring into a batch of problem while at that place.
This same survey besides identified young persons who have many of the same hazard factors
for delinquency, yet did non prosecute in delinquent behaviour. The survey identified
six factors that are said to beef up juveniles so that they do non go
delinquent. These factors are known as protective factors and include the
following: Committedness to school, accomplishment at school, continuation of
instruction ( no dropping out ) , high degrees of parental supervising, high degrees of
fond regard to parents, and association with conventional equals and equals
approved of by their parents ( Schmallenger, 1997: 533 ) These factors explain
why some kids who have high hazard factors for going a juvenile
delinquent do non needfully ever turn out to be delinquent. In my sentiment,
non all kids who happen to be in state of affairss of individual parent households are
traveling to go delinquent. There are some instances where there is no male parent in
the family but an uncle or gramps has stepped into the function of & # 8220 ; father & # 8221 ;
and they end up make fulling that function better that the biological male parent of all time could.
There are besides some instances where there are two parents in the family yet
both parents are bad function theoretical accounts. This is a state of affairs in which the kid of
parents such as these will normally turn out to be a batch like the parents. The
simplest manner to explicate this is that people, as human existences, learn by illustration.
We pick up on what the people around us do and we tend to move as they do, non
as they tell us to make, if they happen to state us to move different than they act.
When I think of juvenile delinquency, I think of Acts of the Apostless that juveniles commit that
are in misdemeanor of the jurisprudence. I think that the causes of juvenile delinquency are
precisely what my interviewee said that they were, deficiency of a strong male function
theoretical account, kids being left unsupervised, and kid maltreatment. The job of so
many kids today is deficiency of strong parental figures. There are excessively many
young persons that have been raised by the telecasting. Until we begin to see our young person
as the most of import plus, we will ne’er work out the job of juvenile
delinquency.
Bynum, Jack E. and William E. Thompson. ( 1999 ) . Juvenile
delinquency: A sociological attack ( 4th ed. ) . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn
& A ; Bacon. Schmallenger, Frank. ( 1997 ) . Condemnable justness today ( 4th ed. ) . Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Smith, Mike. ( 1999 ) . Personal interview. Troy,
MO.