Abstraction
In this paper. you will be able to see how to use professional values. codifications of moralss. and decision-making theoretical account to the procedure of ethical decision-making. I chose to look at ethical quandary figure 4. In this quandary. a client’s confidentiality has been breached ; due to her counsellor. The first attack is for me to place the job and use the ACA codification of moralss. I so place the moral rules and list all possible classs of action that could betake. Besides list all possible effects for each action that could be taken. I so carefully reexamine. after which I chose what I believe to be the most accurate class of action for this scenario. So in conclusion I will take you step by measure of how this action program will be implement.

Ethical Dilemma
I chose to reexamine ethical quandary 4. Where Wilma. a counsellor in a community bureau. has been working with Donna for several months for anxiousness and panic upset. On multiple occasions. Wilma has given Donna prep to finish between Sessionss that has non been completed by Donna. This past hebdomad. Wilma sees Donna once more in session and assigns her some more prep. Subsequently that hebdomad. Wilma and a friend travel out to dinner. Wilma looks up to see that Donna is her waitress. Frustrated with Donna’s deficiency of attempt with her prep and in an attempt to keep Donna accountable. Wilma decides to ask if Donna has done her prep and says. “Donna. I am glad I ran into you. Have you done your prep since our last session? ” I chose to reexamine this peculiar ethical quandary because this is something that could easy go on to any professional. if you fail to believe before you speak. It can even be done with no sick purposes. However this could possible destruct the client and counsellor relationship that has been built. The job with this conjectural ethical quandary is that the client’s confidentiality was broken and relationship boundaries were crossed. This is an ethical and possible a legal job.

It is an ethical job because the clients confidentiality was broken when Wilma inquire if Donna had been working on her prep from their last session. It can besides go a legal issue if Donna pursues it. This can go a major job as it relates to the Wilma and the bureau that she works for because the client’s confidentiality was broken. Donna could reach the bureau that Wilma is employed for. or even reach the province board of counsellors. The ACA codification of moralss screens any ethical issues that a counsellor possibly faced with. While reading over the ACA codification of moralss confidentiality privileged communicating and privateness was coved in great item. Respecting Client Rights was defined as “counselors maintain consciousness and sensitiveness sing cultural significances of confidentiality and privateness. Counselors respect differing positions toward revelation of information.

Counselors hold on-going treatments with clients as to how. when. and with whom information is to be shared” ( Ethics & A ; Professional Standards. 2005 ) . In the instance with Wilma and Donna. Wilma was non sensitivity sing Donna’s privateness. Wilma was holding dinner with a friend and Donna was at work. That was non the right clip to turn to anything that they had coved in a guidance session. Harmonizing the ACA codifications of moralss Wilma did non hold regard for privateness or regard for confidentiality for her client. The ACA codification of moralss defines respect for privateness as “Counselors respect client rights to privateness. Counselors solicit private information from clients merely when it is good to the comforting process” ( Ethics & A ; Professional Standards. 2005 ) . It is besides stated that regard for confidentiality “Counselors do non portion confidential information without client consent or without sound legal or ethical justification” ( Ethics & A ; Professional Standards. 2005 ) .

I believe that it a counselor’s chief moral rule is loyalty to their clients and honouring their committednesss to them. In this instance Donna believe that anything that was discussed in their guidance subdivisions would stay confidential. “There are province and national organisation That work to help clients and professional counsellors in taking the appropriate legal and ethical stairss. The American Counseling Association provides free confidential professional/ethical solaces to members of the ACA. If a counsellor is advice they van reach the ACA Ethics and Professional Standards Department to put up assignments. Counselors can besides reach their province LPCA to have information sing the proper protocol for certain cases” ( Ethics & A ; Professional Standards. 2005 ) . There are several possible class of action in this instance. Any class of action that would be taking would be to the full up to Donna in this instance. Donna could disregard the remarks that Wilma made to her. Donna could speak to Wilma. and express that she didn’t appreciate how she addressed her personal issues in forepart of a alien and while she was at work. Besides let Wilma cognize she would appreciate if she wouldn’t do that once more.

After Donna reference this issue with Wilma she could take to maintain her as her counsellor or inquire for a new counsellor. Donna could besides confer with another counsellor to find the best class of action to take against Wilma. Last. Donna could reach ACA for legal and ethical advice sing breach of confidentiality. For each possible class of action there is a possible effect ( s ) and deductions for each chose. If Donna choses to disregard the remark that Wilma made to her. there will non be any effect for Wilma. However there could be possible effects and/or deductions for Donna. If Donna ignores the remarks. Wilma may maintain to doing statements. If Donna negotiations to Wilma. and express that she didn’t appreciate how she addressed her personal issues in forepart of a alien and while she was at work. this could assist. The effects of this class of action could be good to both Donna and Wilma. It could be good to both parties. Wilma will see that she breached her clients confidentiality and Donna will hold the opportunity to show how that made her feel. This could assist reconstruct the trust that was lost do to Wilma’s deficiency of professionalism ; it could besides assist Donna with her anxiousness. If Donna consults another counsellor to find the best class of action. this could be really of import in this instance.

By discoursing this with another counsellor can assist Donna derive a better penetration as to how to manage and travel frontward with intervention. Last if Donna contacts the ACA board for legal and ethical advice. this could hold major effects for Wilma and the bureau. Wilma will most probably be fined or even have her licences revoked. I believe that the best class of action in this instance would be for Donna to speak Wilma. and express that she didn’t appreciate how she addressed her personal issues in forepart of a alien and while she was at work. I believe this is the best class of action merely because Wilma did non travel into item about what the prep consisted of. Although Donna confidentiality was breached. no important information was exposed. other so the fact that she sees a counsellor. I don’t believe that is would be necessary for any legal action to be taken. I do believe that Donna should inform another member of the bureau of what happened and the class of action that she has chose to take in covering with quandary. The selected class of action does non show any new ethical jobs in my eyes. I believe that Donna has covered herself in all countries. If Donna negotiations to Wilma and besides consult another counsellor in the bureau. this should extinguish any possible ethical jobs.

After reexamining all possible classs of actions and effects. I believe the most good option would be to for Donna to speak Wilma. and express that she didn’t appreciate how she addressed her personal issues in forepart of a alien and while she was at work and consult another counsellor in the bureau. I applied the trial of justness. promotion. and catholicity here are my findings. Justice: In this instance taking to confer with Wilma with this quandary it will assist Wilma be more cognizant of confidentiality of her clients. Promotion: In the public oculus Wilma is non moving ethically. Universality: The class of action that Donna has chosen ( turn toing Wilma and confer withing another counsellor in the bureau ) would be a great recommendation for other people put in similar state of affairss.

There are certain stairss that Donna has to take in order to implement this class of action. First. Donna needs to confer with the other counsellor that works for Wilma bureau. Donna should hold a sit down conversation with this individual and travel over each item of the event that happen on the dark she was working. Besides Donna should show the class of action that she wants to take to manage this instance. Last Donna. Wilma and the counsellor that Donna informed of the incident should all hold a sit down conversation. Donna can so explicate to Wilma how she felt and the deficiency of professionalism. Wilma and Donna are both being protected in this instance because there is a three individual at that place to over see the conversation and take notes that can travel into Wilma and Donna records.

Mentions
Chappell. C. ( 2013. July 1 ) . Virginia Board of Counseling. Retrieved November 15. 2013. from Virgunia. gov:
World Wide Web. dhp. Virginia. gov/counseling/counseling_law_regs. htm

Ethical motives & A ; Professional Standards. ( 2005 ) . Retrieved November 15. 2013. from American Counseling Association: World Wide Web. counseking. org/knowledge-centr/ethics