Majority of us worlds get up from bed in the forenoon. set out for school or our occupation and practically make our day-to-day modus operandis in a manner that is alone to us. We interact to our environment and the people around us without to the full understanding why we are making our everyday – why we go to school or make great in our occupation or are amused from a peculiar activity. Nonetheless we all know that there is something that motivates us for making this. Motivation refers to the things either internal or external to a individual from which makes him enthusiastic and relentless on prosecuting a peculiar class of action ( Daft. 526 ) .

Analyzing motive makes us understand what makes us people initiate a certain action. and what influences our choice of actions. After I took the motive evaluation test. I have a moderate degree of group motive. This means that I am non to the full committed to my group but besides non wholly ignoring how my group will execute. After taking the test. I realized that there are factors that affect a person’s motive on a group.

Some of these factors are: 1 ) composing of the group ; 2 ) committedness and dedication of other members ; 3 ) chemical science within the group ; 4 ) grasp of the group ; and 5 ) each member’s part for the group’s success. Upon taking the test. I became cognizant that the factor that largely affects my motive in a group is a member’s committedness and dedication to the group. This is possibly because I have the wont of giving my best on anything that I am making. Having this attitude makes me compare what my parts to the other members of my group.

If I think that they are non every bit dedicated as me. my motive becomes lower. Appreciation of the group is the following factor that affects my motive. In my sentiment. merely a sufferer would work on a group that does non value what he is making. When it comes to the composing of my group. the lone job is that some of the members of the group are so diffident to even state their names. I have encountered this sort of members. They normally want to work on their ain. The lone thing a leader should make is give him/her what she will make and that is all. The composing of the group is indispensable to another factor. chemical science.

The interaction within a group is besides of import when sing one’s motive. Working with group whose chemical science is good normally leads to accomplishing the group’s end. Contribution of other members to the group besides affects my motive. If all of the members participate good and lend what they should give makes me desire to besides make my portion good. On the other manus. if some members do non really assist with the accomplishment of our group’s ends. the other members. including myself. would hold to exercise more attempt. Therefore. we have to be more motivated.

The motive test made me recognize that I am reasonably motivated when I am involved in a group. Unlike before. I think I can besides mensurate the dedication of the other group members. With this. I am able to compare my degree of motive with the other members of the group. Merely a small spot has truly changed. I still do my portion wholeheartedly. I try to go to all of the scheduled group meetings and make my best to assist the group finish its ends. The lone thing that changed is on how I interact with them. Normally before taking the test. I merely ask something to the group if I am holding problem understanding what I should make.

I do non desire a conversation other than the jobs that the group is covering with. Now. I talk to my other co-members about anything under the Sun to further better our chemical science. With each member’s trust and friendliness. I became a batch motivated. After taking this test and analysing my consequences. there are some things that I would alter in order to farther better my engagement and motive in other future groups. First. I will better my interaction to my future co-members. The chemical science becomes the “spark” of a good group relationship.

If group members interact to each other with regard and friendliness. everyone will assist on each. Therefore. group ends will be done in a smooth manner. In the hereafter. I will besides actuate my co-members. I will speak to them if I think they are non take parting good in the group and promote them that we are a squad and we have to work together to be successful. There are some theories or attacks to farther better motive within an organisation. One peculiar theory is the Expectancy Theory associated to the plants of Victor Vroom with a figure of parts from other bookmans.

The Expectancy theory implies that the grade of motive of a certain person is associated on his outlooks on their capableness to execute a peculiar undertaking and the coveted awards he will have. Expectancy theory focuses on the thought procedure nowadays to an person to derive wagess. non on acknowledging what his demands are ( Daft. 536 ) . With this theory. I think that sharing my outlooks to my co-members will farther better each of our motives. therefore bettering the public presentation of the group. The factor that largely affects my motives. based on the consequences. is the committedness of the other group members.

If other members do non make their portion. my motive decreases. I am non comfy working with a group who is non every bit committed as me. In order to avoid this. confrontation is needed. Other member should be confronted sing their attitude and their several duties to the group. In a sense. before the group does anything. regulations should be made clear. Contented Theories can besides be used to better motive within an organisation. One of these Content theories is the celebrated Hierarchy of Needs theory by Abraham Maslow.

The theory suggests that there are five categories of demands that motivate a individual bing in a hierarchal signifier. Maslow argues that needs with low-ranks should be the precedence. These demands ( from lowest to highest rank ) are as follows: 1 ) Physiological needs – the most basic physical demands of worlds ; 2 ) Safety needs – the demand for a protected and harmless physical and emotional scene ; 3 ) Belongingness needs – the desire to be in a peculiar group with their trust ; 4 ) Esteem needs – the demand for grasp and acknowledgment within a group or organisation ; 5 ) Self-actualization demands – the demand of self-fulfillment ( Daft. 529-530 ) .

The suited inducement for the group would be from the classs of belongingness and esteem demands. To better motive within the group. one should admit each member for what he had done for the group. Appreciation should besides be given to them even though their work is non that excellent. At least they have given their best. For every work that a member accomplishes. the other members should at least attempt to thank him/her. A simple line of “good job” will do a individual exert more attempts and be more motivated. Mention: Daft. Richard. 2005. Management fifth Ed. New York: MacMillan Printing Company.