Many critics like William Deans Howells ; T. S. Eliot etc. hold called Jonathan Swift the greatest author of prose like T. S. Eliot says that

“Swift. the greatest author of English prose. and the greatest adult male who has of all time written great English prose. ”

But there are grounds for this illustriousness. One of the chief grounds is that Swift wrote in a really field and downright manner. He didn’t use any embroideries. At times. when Swift was composing serious material this same field manner appears dry but when composing humorously. this same plainness gives his humor a remarkable border. Swift didn’t usage ornate or rhetorical linguistic communication ; he said what he had to in merely without any mannerism as Hugh Blair says

“His manner is of the field and simple sort ; free of all mannerism. and all overplus ; limpid. manfully and pure. ”

And at times. his manner appears so simple that its seems like anybody with a small sense of authorship could compose like him but in this same simple cape of mode lies Swift’s illustriousness like Scott says

“Swift’s manner seems so simple that one would believe any kid might compose as he does. and yet if we try we find to our ain desperation that it is impossible. ”

This same simpleness of manner in Gulliver’s Travels corresponds to the naivete and simpleness of Gulliver.

Another of import characteristic of Swift’s prose is that he uses the common touch. In other words. everybody can understand his linguistic communication that is why even kids can read his books with so much enjoyment. Besides. Fleet addresses people as rational and political existences. doing them his peers. For illustration. in Drapier’s Letters Swift uses the same linguistic communication of the category which he is turn toing i. e. unsmooth and shrewd. Swift doesn’t write long sentences or addresss or hard words. And he familiarizes with the people by utilizing their ain simple and at times harsh linguistic communication.

Invention or imaginativeness is an aspect enchantress makes Swift one of the greatest English authors. J. J. Hogan says

“One of Swift’s greatest mercantile establishments. of class. was innovation. ”

Although Swift has used many non-sensical and fanciful words. but these fanciful words have an implicit in significance. For illustration. Lindalino indicates “Dublin” . Nardac when broken down in German Narr ( intending sap ) and doch ( intending still ) turns into ‘still a fool’ . Hekinah Degul can be translated. on evidences of similarity of sound. turns into ‘What in the devil’ . Glumdalclitch can be divided into Gallic ‘grand’ and Latin ‘altrix’ which in bend is combined to bring forth the significance ‘enormous nurse’ . The word Grildrig can be translated into ‘Girl-thing’ or ‘doll’ . Swift besides uses onomatopoetic words for illustration. Gulliver. Lilliput. Brobdingnag. Houyhnhnms. Yahoos etc. The name Lilliput suggest something little like in the word small. Brobdingnag suggest something. which is large.

The same manner Houyhnhnms ( marked Whinnims ) sounds merely like the neighing of a Equus caballus and Yahoo is the sound that people make when they are liberated. Even the names that Swift gives to characters are onomatopoetic like Gulliver which is similar in sound to gullible. the emperor’s name in Lilliput Golbasto Momaren Evlame Gurdilo Shefin Mully Ully Gue shows a small spot of the hyperbolic nature of the emperor and the last portion Mully Ully Gue sounds pathetic after such a long. inflated name. And Swift attempts to give significance to these same words to make a sense of genuineness for illustration. in ocean trip II. Gulliver is described every bit being every bit large as a splacknuck. So. although some words sound wholly non-sensical at that place. is. infact some sense and significance behind them.

There are a few other ways in which Swift’s authorship is so singular. One of them is that is that Swift creates genuineness through the usage of antediluvian linguistic communication ( like the linguistic communication used in the Old Testament ) for illustration after his long sleep. Gulliver says that he awaked after a long sleep. Besides. Swift goes into really infinitesimal item of anything that he’s depicting. Like he describes the exact latitude. longitude. day of the months. naval inside informations. inside informations about vesture. manners. etc. At times. these same inside informations are really gross outing like he describes how he had to unburden himself in Lilliput or the mendicants in Brobdingna. but these same disgusting inside informations create pragmatism.

One of the most outstanding characteristics of Swift’s authorship is his sarcasm. which is described by Jacques Barzun as more lifelessly than a trap. His sarcasm is really acrimonious. it isn’t gentle at all. But the best thing about his sarcasm is that he’s satirising the society through person as naive and gentle as Gulliver. Swift most caustic sarcasm is on adult females and politicians. although. at times he does satirise other people like the scientists in Voyage III of Gulliver’s Travels or the spiritual members through The Tale of a Tub.

Swift normally uses situational sarcasm to knock or when he overly praises person. it’s a scheme of sarcasm and Swift manipulates this congratulations for his ain satiric terminals.

So the chief grounds why Swift’s prose is apparent flawlessness is that he writes in a simple mode. uses common linguistic communication. he uses fanciful and non-sensical words and gives genuineness to these words. the usage of antediluvian linguistic communication to give genuineness. the description of everything up to the minutest item and the manner in which Swift uses sarcasm.