Kant’s review of Utilitarianism is that it treats people as a means non as an ends in themselves. Since he is a deontologist he presumes that there is a cosmopolitan moral jussive mood. certain ways in which we must move. no affair what our single desires or demands or public-service corporation might be. The Categorical Imperative is an thought of ground. This cognition is non derived from experience but instead. it is a priori. It besides binds us and we all act in a certain manner because of it. It is unconditioned. It is the first rule of the moral jurisprudence and it applies to rational and sensible existences. Since we are sensuous animals. we experience the moral jurisprudence as a restraint. We have a inclination to make otherwise because we may come across moral quandary. Sometimes we know we should make something but we might ground against it. Kant believed that by seting something through the CI process we would be able to see if it was moral or immoral.
There are four stairss in this process. First you formulate you subjective axioms. Let us utilize the illustration that: I will rip off on my doctrine trial because I didn’t have adequate clip to analyze. The following measure is to generalise this axiom. so for every clip I don’t have adequate clip to analyze I will rip off on my doctrine trial. Then you universalize this axiom as if it were an inherent aptitude: everyone will rip off on their doctrine trial every clip they don’t have adequate clip to analyze. You so take this new jurisprudence and fall in it with the old jurisprudence and compare its affects. Now that I have put it through these four stairss it is a given that people will analyze on their doctrine trial every clip they don’t have adequate clip to analyze.
This will take away the value of a good class that a individual that surveies may have. You so inquire yourself two inquiries: Can I coherently conceive of such a universe? And if so. Can I unfeignedly will such a universe? If at the terminal of all this. the axiom drops out and passes all these trials so it is all right to move on it because it is morally allowable. As seen in my illustration. it is non moral to rip off on a trial because if everyone did it so it would devaluate the good classs that people got that put work and attempt into analyzing for the trial.
Kant claims that moving from the categorical Imperative “reveals to us our freedom and dignity” . by this he means that Dignity brings about your morality which is what makes you portion of the Kingdom of terminals. It frees us from our senses by doing us recognize our ain nature. The Categorical Imperative reveals what is moral and immoral and therefore we are able distinguish the two and this allows us to be independent and if you are independent so you are free.
