King Of Kings Essay, Research Paper

Even though the people of Israel were under the leading of the Godhead God, they were non pleased. They wanted a human male monarch, person fallible and imperfect to take them. Even so, God was forgiving and appointed a human male monarch over them. As I intend to turn out, kingship was non a good thing for the state of Israel because male monarchs were corrupt and iniquitous. They imposed rough labours and Torahs on the people who followed them. But most significantly, by holding a male monarch, they were turning their dorsums on God. There were a few benefits that came from holding a male monarch, but these proved to be an semblance.

Many will reason that a male monarch was good for Israel. Advocates for a male monarch argue that male monarchs brought political stableness to the state. By enforcing revenue enhancements and labours, they argue that the economic stableness of the state was established. A male monarch would unify all the folks of Israel into a individual state under his leading. A human male monarch was person whom all the people could near and speak to, whereas God merely appeared to a choice few people.

While David was king over Israel, the land reached its extremum in district and conquerings. He captured the fastnesss of Zion and Jerusalem ; 2 metropoliss which held great importance to the people of Israel. Solomon, with the cognition God gave him, was possibly the wisest adult male of his clip. He was a great supreme authority of justness and the deepnesss of his cognition amazed all who came to seek his advocate. A male monarch was besides the leader of the ground forces and would take his military personnels into conflict. Even though these were good facets of holding a male monarch, they did non get the better of the negative facets of kingship.

I will reason that holding a male monarch was bad for the state of Israel. I will rebut the statements that protagonists of a male monarch. Even though the Israelites made many territorial conquerings under the leading of King David, these additions would merely be impermanent. They would subsequently lose much of the lands they gained. David, though he was a good male monarch, besides sinned against God. He coveted another? s married woman and indirectly had her hubby killed. Even though Solomon was wise, all his wisdom could non forestall him from transgressing against God. A male monarch and his reign are non lasting. A good male monarch may sit on the throne, but he will decease, and the male monarch who follows him may non be a good male monarch at all. In many instances, God did non anoint the male monarchs that were chosen. God, on the other manus, is ever-present for his people in their clip of demand. God is good and all-powerful and will ever make what is best for his people. God was the leader of the Israelites through the Judgess, but the people rejected Him in their privation of holding a male monarch.

Sin and corruptness are to be found in human nature. When God appointed a human to be male monarch, it was inevitable that he would transgress. Though they started out good as male monarchs, they finally lost their righteousness and religion. We can see that no male monarch has been all good and merely. Saul, the first male monarch of the Israelites, sinned rapidly against God. He does non wait for Samuel to get and makes a forfeit of his ain to God. After Saul did so, God? declinations that [ He ] made Saul King over Israel? ( I Samuel 15.28 ) . David, who has been widely regarded as being the best male monarch in Israel, besides sinned against God. In his lecherousness for his soldier? s adult female, David sends her hubby to the front lines of conflict where he is killed. David so marries his married woman. God was angry a

T David for this wickedness and punished him. Solomon, irrespective of all his wisdom, sinned against God. Because he took so many married womans and courtesans, they overwhelmed him and convinced him to construct up statues of their Gods for worship. God was angry that he made false graven images of worship and that he worshipped them with his married womans. Furthermore to the wickednesss of the male monarchs, the competition for kingship was besides a ferocious 1. Inevitably, boies of the male monarch would contend the throne. David? s ain boy, Absalom, rebellions against him for the place of male monarch. The male monarchs of Judah and the male monarchs of Israel besides fought for the throne of Israel. With the male monarch? s deficiency of religion and the acrimonious bickers of their boies, wickedness and corruptness ran rampant throughout the kingships.

As by the patterns of male monarchs set Forth by God, male monarchs forced labour and revenue enhancements on the Israelites. They took harvests, kids, flocks, and slaves from the people. When the Israelites foremost wanted a male monarch, God told the people, through Samuel, the patterns of a male monarch. He told them that a male monarch would enforce labours and Torahs upon the people. He even tells them that there will come? the twenty-four hours when you cry out because of the male monarch whom you yourselves have chose ; and the Lord will non reply you on that twenty-four hours? ( I Samuel 9.16 ) . The people chose to non listen to God or to Samuel. They wanted really severely to be like other states, no affair the monetary value. Solomon used the people? s labour to construct the House of the Lord and his ain palace. When Solomon died, his boy Rehoboam became king. The Israelites asked him to? buoy up the yoke your male parent placed upon us? ( I Kings 12.10 ) . Not merely did Rehoboam non listen, but said, ? My male parent made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke ; my male parent flogged you with whips, but I will welt you with Scorpio? ( I Kings 12.10 ) . The male monarchs abused their place for their ain benefit and made the people suffer greatly.

When the Israelites cried out for a human male monarch, they were turning their dorsums on God. They would non mind the warnings of Samuel ; the people were inexorable about holding a human male monarch. They wanted to, ? be like all other states? ( I Samuel 8.3 ) . Though God was their male monarch, He tells Samuel that he will name a human male monarch for the Israelites. The Lord tells Samuel that, ? it is non you they have rejected ; it is Me they have rejected as their male monarch? ( I Samuel 8.3 ) . Having God as their male monarch was really good to the Israelites. In the clip before kingship, Judgess would govern with the aid of God. Each clip that they would process out to make conflict and had God at their side, they would be winning, no affair how outnumbered and outmatched they were. The Israelites were excessively unsighted to see this nevertheless. They wanted above all else to hold a male monarch and to hold him take them into conflict. They wanted a human male monarch to give their state an individuality, non to be the state of God. But without the aid of God, the male monarch and its state would non last.

Ultimately, a kingship was damaging for the state of Israel. Though at that place seemed to hold short-run benefits, in the long tally, holding a male monarch was non good. The male monarchs would systematically transgress against God. They were morally corrupt and would make what they pleased, non what pleased the people. And eventually, by holding their male monarch, they turned their dorsums to God. This entirely should hold been ground adequate to non hold a male monarch. God was their defender and Jesus, no human being could of all time come near to fiting Him.

321