Legalize Marijuana Essay, Research Paper

The legalisation of marihuana will cut down offense, narcotic drug usage, and make a Utopian society. Marijuana & # 8217 ; s consequence on society is greatly over exaggerated in that marijuana Acts of the Apostless as a whipping boy for many of society & # 8217 ; s jobs. Marijuana is blamed today for being a gateway drug ; this means that ingestion of marihuana will take to utilize of narcotic drugs, this claim has ne’er been proven, the lone evidences for it is that marihuana is a more widespread and more sampled drug. Furthermore, the legalisation of marihuanas would make possible revenue enhancement gross that would flux from a regulated market in marihuana.

Marijuana grows throughout temperate parts, with more powerful assortments produced in dry, hot, highland climes. Marijuana is defined as a hemp works ; and or a readying made from the dried flower bunchs and foliages of the hemp works, smoked or eaten to bring on euphory ( & # 8221 ; marijuana, & # 8221 ; 827, Webster & # 8217 ; s ) . Euphoria is a feeling of great felicity or good being ( & # 8221 ; euphoria, & # 8221 ; 468 ) .

Chronic marihuana users may develop a motivational syndrome characterized by passiveness, decreased motive, and preoccupation with taking drugs. The relationship of this syndrome to marijuana usage, nevertheless, has non been established. Like intoxicant poisoning, marijuana poisoning impairs judgement, comprehension, memory, address, problem-solving ability, and reaction clip. The consequence of long-run usage on the mind is unknown. There is no grounds that marihuana induces or causes encephalon harm ( & # 8221 ; marijuana & # 8221 ; 2, Microsoft ) .

The Drug Enforcement Agency estimates that we soon have 20 million regular users of marihuana in the United States ( Heerema 130 ) . The inclusion of drug users within society is in bend based on the premiss that the desire to change consciousness is a normal human trait, a thrust every bit deep as the demand for nutrient, shelter and love ( Siegel 1989 ) . Humans perceive the usage of marihuana to change their province of consciousness as being a basic inherent aptitude that seems harmless and natural.

Prohibition creates offense ; it does non work out offense. It creates a tenseness within society that society can non long bear. However, because some members of society are more tolerant of drug usage than others, the effort at prohibition necessarily tears society apart. It seems to work, for a piece, but earlier or subsequently the prohibition attack becomes indefensible if society is to turn instead than stagnate. In the long tally, society bit by bit adapts to the alterations made necessary by the failure of the War on Drugs ; and the new drugs appear, and so the rhythm starts over ( Aldrich 548 ) . Therefore, if society wants to go on to turn, we must let its dwellers to change their province of consciousness by utilizing marihuana.

A legal, regulated drug supply ( as intoxicant, baccy, java, tea, and prescription drugs ) encourages people both socially and personally to utilize the smallest dose and the lowest authority that will be effectual. It encourages standardization and control of drug usage, and discourages maltreatment. It accepts a certain societal cost in that the usage of these drugs will do jobs for some members of society ; but it does non deny that drug usage is human, and alternatively works through the jobs presented by drug usage in such a manner as to minimise their injury.

In precisely opposite manner, the condemnable attack to drug usage encourages drug maltreatment, by trying to cut off supply. This policy limitation makes the coveted trade good scarce and hard to obtain. In bend, the user wants every bit much as possible, in the highest possible authority, for stashing every bit good as immediate usage. This policy ignores the basic human impulse to acquire high, discourages the controlled usage of drugs, and offers no normal socialisation, no internal or external controls, and no possibility of injury decrease. It puts even the insouciant or experimental user into the illicit drug subculture where maltreatment is more likely ; and any effort to encoura

ge self-denial, that is, demoing people how to utilize drugs intelligently and in the least harmful manner, is seen as excusing maltreatment ( Weil and Rosen 1983 ) . Therefore, the illicit drug scene, created by drug prohibition Torahs, encourages high-dose, high-potency drug seeking, and discourages moderateness and self-regulation.

The procedure of dilution is possible when drugs are lawfully regulated ; but non when they are reprehensively distributed. In fact, dilution of strength is the footing for mass selling of legal drugs ; it could be the footing for ordinance of marihuana. Temperance means utilizing drugs reasonably, intelligently and safely, instead than in the habit-forming manner promoted by drug prohibition.

By replacing the War on Drugs with a policy of standardization and societal credence, including de facto legalisation of marihuana, the Dutch have made believable drug instruction possible. Alternatively of kicking childs who use drugs out of school, they have instituted a & # 8220 ; healthy life & # 8221 ; course of study get downing in simple classs that objectively outlines the pleasances, every bit good as the dangers of drug usage. Here once more, the consequences have been positive. The mean age of nuts has risen from 26 in 1984 to thirty-one in 1989, bespeaking that really few users are being added to society ( Tempest 1989 ) . This illustration of what has been traveling on in Amsterdam is a clear illustration of what can go on in the United States. The legalisation of marihuana can be good for the war on drugs, supplying that proper instruction is provided.

In the name of prolonging the drug war, we are taught that marihuana is deadly, a carcinogenic and habit-forming. While marihuana has its hazards, particularly for kids, none of this is true. Neither is it true that marihuana has no recognized medical usage ; in 1991, about half the oncologists who answered a Harvard Medical School Survey said they would order marihuana for alleviation of chemotherapy side effects were it legal, and most had already recommended it to their patients ( Baum, 132 ) .

Soon the United States will alter, alternatively of reprobating all the drugs that are now defined as illicit, differentiations will be made between those drugs showing a societal job and those determined to be victimless, such as marihuanas. While they will ne’er likely be wholly acceptable, drugs like marihuana will be seen as less threatening, less destructive, and less evil. Marijuana usage will come to be seen as a victimless activity. This alteration in attitude will take to intensified force per unit area to legalise the usage of marihuana. The logical thinking would be: If our citizens want to devour it, and it merely harms them marginally, why deny their right to make so when all we are making is making a immense illicit industry and a big new condemnable population. Therefore, early in the 2000s I expect to witness the formal legalisation of marihuana ; and the decrease of offense, narcotic drugs usage, and a more peaceable Utopian society.

Mentions

Aldrich, M. & # 8220 ; Legalize the lesser to minimise the greater: Modern application of antediluvian wisdom. & # 8221 ; Journal of Drug Issues. Fall 1990, Vol. 20 Issue 4: 543-554

Baum, Don. The War on Drugs: Opposing Views. Greenhaven Press, Sand, 1998

Burnet, J. Early Geek Philosophy. New York. Meridian World, 1957.

& # 8220 ; Euphoria. & # 8221 ; Webster & # 8217 ; s New World Dictionary. Third College Edition. 1988.

Heerema, Douglas L. & # 8220 ; Drug usage in the 1990 & # 8217 ; s. & # 8221 ; Business Horizons. Jan/Feb 1990, Vol. 33: 127-135.

& # 8220 ; Marijuana. & # 8221 ; Webster & # 8217 ; s New World Dictionary. Third College Edition. 1988.

& # 8220 ; Marijuana. & # 8221 ; Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 99. CD- ROM. Berger: Microsoft, 1999.

Siegel, R.K. Intoxication: Life in Pursuit of Artificial Paradise. New York: E.P. Dutton, 1989.

Tempest, R. Amsterdam & # 8217 ; s War on Drugs. San Francisco Chronicle, October 4, 1989.

Weil, A and W. Rosen. Chocolate to Morphine: Understanding Mind-Active Drugs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1983.