Legalizing Prostitution Essay, Research Paper

Prostitution is an issue which has caused controversy cross-culturally and historically and which has many persons reviewing the logistics of it. If harlotry is decriminalized it will go economically profitable and executable for non merely the cocottes, but besides western society as a whole. Without the twentieth century western Torahs, which force harlotry resistance, the profession of harlotry could go a clean and safe business. Prostitution Torahs are unconstitutional and deny the cocottes what the American fundamental law allows them. Prostitution is an illegal act in Canada and big parts of the United States which, if legalized, would protect and profit twentieth century western society. If sanctioned, harlotry will go economically moneymaking for the authoritiess involved. The colossal sum of money spent each twelvemonth on cocotte bar could be spent on more pressing issues, which is precisely what the San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution found. The entire costs accounted for in this study amounts to $ 7,634,750.00. Given the many countries in which we found that information is non available, or there are concealed costs, the over all disbursal to the taxpayer exceeds $ 7.6 million annually.1 The San Francisco Task Force is a group of research workers, constabulary officers, members of the San Francisco community, authorities functionaries and cocottes, who often meet to discourse the issues of harlotry and to seek to come to some solution. Although they may non ever hold, two issues they are in understanding about are that the $ 7.6 million dollars would be better spent elsewhere and that harlotry should be legalized.. Robert Noce of Manitoba metropolis council wants reform of the Canadian Justice System and he would wish to see harlotry go worthwhile to Canadian taxpayers. Quite honestly, for anyone to propose to me a dating or bodyguard bureau is merely offering company is being rather naif. Let & # 8217 ; s non seek to bury our caputs in the sand and feign nil else is traveling on. Alternatively of feigning these constitutions don & # 8217 ; t exist allow & # 8217 ; s alternatively be logical about this and seek to utilize the net incomes that we could be doing, in a wise and utile mode. I think that the highest paying clients for harlotry is us Canadians, in the money we put into contending this ineffectual cause.2 Alternatively of seting 1000000s of dollars into halting this consensual act, the money saved and made from the legalisation of harlotry can be spent on contending child harlotry and coerced harlotry. These two offenses are going rampant across North America, but deficiency of financess prevents a serious attempt from being made to contend against them. If whorehouses and cocottes were to be taxed like any other topographic point of concern, 1000000s of excess gross dollars would go available to the Canadian authorities, for it to pass as it sees fit. Although the pecuniary concerns are overpowering one of the most debated issues is the wellness and safety of harlotry. If harlotry were to be decriminalized, the profession of harlotry could go a healthy, publically canonic topographic point of concern. Throughout history and throughout European civilizations, harlotry has been legalized to diminish the spread of disease as historian Jennifer James studies. Get downing with Prussia in 1700, most Continental European authoritiess shifted their tactics from suppression of harlotry and sexually familial disease to command through a system of compulsory enrollment, accredited whorehouses, and medical review of cocottes. Although medical techniques were crude there was a noticeable diminution in sexual diseases among cocottes and their clients.3 European authoritiess 100s of old ages ago realized that since they could non contend harlotry, it was best to do it as safe and healthy as they could. Their attempts saved 100s of lives and provided intervention to the cocottes who antecedently could non seek medical attending without being arrested. A recent episode of 20/20 interviewed Joe McNamara, former constabulary head of Kansas and San Jose, and frailty squad officers as they discussed the physical injury that anti-prostitution Torahs inflict JOE MCNAMARA: What we & # 8217 ; re making now is worse than harlotry. JOHN STOSSEL: The jurisprudence makes it worse? JOE MCNAMARA: The jurisprudence makes it a batch worse. It drives up the net incomes. It drives up the potency for corruptness. It invites force. JOHN STOSSEL: It is true that when the frailty cops talk about the awful things they see & # 8230 ; 2ND VICE SQUAD OFFICER: You see homicides. You see the narcotics. You see the assaults. JOHN STOSSEL: They & # 8217 ; re speaking about things caused non by harlotry itself, but by the jurisprudence. Because the jurisprudence drives harlotry resistance into the condemnable universe, where everyone & # 8217 ; s concealing from the constabulary. 2ND VICE SQUAD

Military officer: We see the black eyes. We se

e the rapes. We see them crying. JOHN STOSSEL: Such problems occur much less often where sex for money is legal. Here, in rural Nevada, for example, the state has licensed 35 brothels. These businesses don’t have robberies, rapes or beatings.4 The Nevada police force is an advocate for the legalization of prostitution because they have seen the difference that legalization makes. Crime rates drop when prostitution is brought to a setting where it is monitored. Prostitutes are forced to work through established brothels and are forbidden to work out of their homes. All prostitutes and brothels must be licensed and the brothels must provide the prostitutes with personal doctors who test all of the prostitutes for sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV tests are done on a monthly basis and condoms are mandatory. When prostitution is legalized, not only are the pimps, who are often involved in other illegal affairs illuminated, but the prostitute and the community are protected. Anti-prostitution laws are unconstitutional in their nature and deny the prostitutes what the American constitution would allow them. In 1973 the case of Roe v. Wade established certain legal precedents concerning a woman’s body, the court found that: “a woman has a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy, does exist in the Constitution and that it is founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action. This right of privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman’s body and her decision of whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.”5 Although the courts in the case of Roe v. Wade were referring to the woman’s right to abort her unborn fetus they inadvertently set a precedent for prostitution as well. The fourteenth amendment of the American constitution states that all individuals have the right to life, liberty, and the ownership of property. For the Roe v. Wade court to find that liberty encompasses the meaning of aborting what is, by definition, the woman’s own property, a woman should have the right, under the constitution, to not only sell her property, but to do it in privacy. In 1905 during the case of Lochner v. New York Mr. Justice Holmes made a closing statement appropriate to the issue of the constitutionality of Prostitution. [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.6 What Mr. Justice Holmes was trying to convey to the jury was that certain subjects like prostitution cannot be viewed as a moral issue but as a constitutional legal issue. Prostitution cannot be judged using preconceived notions, but rather by viewing all of the facts and determining logistically whether or not prostitutes are receiving lawful treatment. The answer to this question is that they are not. Prostitution in the 20th century in Western society is an illegal act which if were to be legalized would profit and preserve not only the prostitutes but society as a whole. Legalizing prostitution is economically profitable for governments in dire need of resources. The anti-prostitution laws which are intended to help the prostitutes and society, instead force prostitution underground and without these laws prostitution could become a clean and safe occupation. Present day prostitution laws are unconstitutional and should be abolished because of their unconstitutional nature. Prostitution and prostitutes are issues that few individuals have taken the time to fully understand, and so the issues are misunderstood and their voices go unheard. Some issues, like prostitution, have been around for thousands of years and will never go away, so it is for this reason that, as Barbara Walter said, “Prostitution is a world that is here to stay, like it or not it is time to make the best of it”7. Endnotes 1. San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution: Report.1994. www.bayswan.org/SFTFP.html 2. Jeffs, Allyson. Legalizing Prostitution. Edmonton Journal. October 21 1997. 3. James, Jennifer. Encarta: Prostitution. Microsoft. 1997 4. 20/20. Sex for Sale: Should Prostitution be legal in America? ABC. June 27 1997 5. Roe v. Wade 1973 6. Lochner v. New York. 1905 7. 20/20. Sex for Sale: Should Prostitution be legal in America? ABC. June 27 1997 Bibliography 1.20/20. Sex for Sale: Should Prostitution be legal in America? ABC. June 27 1997 2.20/20. Sex for Sale: Should Prostitution be legal in America? ABC. June 27 1997 3.James, Jennifer. Encarta: Prostitution. Microsoft. 1997 4.Jeffs, Allyson. Legalizing Prostitution. Edmonton Journal. October 21 1997. 5.Lochner v. New York. 1905 6.Roe v. Wade 1973 7.San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution: Report.1994. www.bayswan.org/SFTFP.html