Love And Hate Essay, Research Paper

On Love and Hate

Historically, extremes in emotion and ground do non frequently mix. I am

therefore cautious of trying to comb through love or hatred with ground. My

resorts are two: to ( yes, utilizing what ground I have ) separate rational

thought from emotion ; and to use every bit small ground as possible without

discontinuing to compose.

It seems sensible ( regretful ) to presume that emotion and ground have

nil to make with each other. It besides seems really likely that one can non

exist with the other. They seem capable of cohabitation within a individual

individual, but fall upon differing objects. Are non the things we love or

hatred non the things we understand?

Hate:

Hate is one of our reactions to a deficiency of understanding. We can non

hatred that which we understand. Hate is our defeat at failure to

comprehend. The more we understand something hated, the more our hate

becomes sadness or commiseration, or deepens to a hate of that which caused

whatever it was that we did non understand. In the latter instance, the hate

may increase with understanding, but the object of the hate has shifted.

We are given a broad scope of waies for covering with our hatred, from

the selfless to the ultraconservative. The philanthropists, wishing peace without

social strife, tell us to quash our hatred and replace it with love, a

way edge finally for affectional detonation and dislocation. The diametric

way gives us a series of smaller detonations with promise of emotional

stableness as a consequence of changeless ejection of malevolent impulses.

Neither of these, or combinations thereof, are awfully productive

ways in which to cover with hatred, as even the moderate waies trade with the

hatred merely superficially and inefficiently. I see the lone manner around

hatred being understanding. Upon comprehension of the object of hatred,

one is either better equipped for the constructive remotion of said object,

coolie and rationally ; or no longer wishful of the remotion. Either result

is to the full fulfilling selflessly. In the latter instance, one must accept

at the same time a spot of humbleness for holding been mistaken every bit good as a spot

of pride for holding become a bit more right. This leaves one emotionally

balanced. The hate is non repressed, but transformed. The same

emotional energy is merely working in a different way. Upon the

remotion of the object, the hate is put to work in a positive mode

alternatively of merely floging out half-cocked and perchance falsely.

The procedure is merely that of inquiring: & # 8220 ; why does this particular

state of affairs be? & # 8221 ; , and & # 8220 ; what can be done to do this state of affairs non to

be? & # 8221 ; . Recognize that merely as for every action, there is an equal and

opposite reaction ; for every reaction, there is an equal and opposite

cause ; and that nil is merely either cause or consequence, but everything is

both.

Love:

Ask the same inquiries, hope non to happen replies, and wear & # 8217 ; t be

disappointed when you do. If you find understanding of the object of love,

it will no longer be an object of love, as love, likewise to detest, is a

reaction to a deficiency of apprehension. The faster you find replies, the more

superficial the emotion. When replies come in the signifier of more inquiries,

you have a true indicant of the strength and thoroughness of the

emotion, and there is more likelyhood that when love eventually disappears,

through comprehension, it will be replaced with regard and esteem

which you will happen really easy to state yourself is the same thing.

I am sorry if it seems I have advised you to treat that diminish

or destruct emotions ; I have non. Emotions, contrary to poetic premise,

are non lasting, but transitory ( although it is surely non impossible

for them to stay for continuances transcending a human life-time ) . I believe

that the proper thing to make with emotions is to consummate them, non to

either prolong or shorten their continuance, for one is stagnancy and the

other repression.

_