Media Essay, Research Paper

I believe that through media, society? s point of views are swayed easy without critically believing about the issues. In this paper I would wish to concentrate on how the media has affected and will impact the people who are voting or are believing about vote in the 2000 Presidential Election. The three chief types of media I would wish to concentrate on are telecasting, wireless, and the newspaper.

First, I would wish to give a short account of the three types of media I chose. For telecasting, I chose to utilize MTV and CNN. MTV uses the run, ? Choose or Loose, ? which focuses on younger electors. MTV tends to emphasize subjects that are more of import to younger viewing audiences, such as pollution or abortion. MTV doesn? T choose a side in the election, but attempts to give the two major parties equal airtime. Very rarely is a 3rd party shown, but still, ? Choose of Loose, ? helps to mobilise younger electors. I believe that MTV? s? Choose or Loose, ? run is a great tool for younger electors to go informed. There are many other shows on telecasting about the elections, but I think they are geared toward the older, working category. Major webs tend to demo the addresss of campaigners and dissect budget plans, which is more of import to the employed. Besides, some of these webs tend to advance one campaigner. An illustration of this is CNN, which seems to hold largely Republican talk shows. These shows stress the good things about the Republicans and seek to dismiss the Democratic Party. Besides, I chose the wireless show, ? Mancow? s Morning Madhouse, ? to assist show the ways media influences people. In the show the host, Mancow, tries really difficult to press people to vote. His show has some of the highest evaluations in the state and reaches many people. The last signifier of media I chose to utilize was? The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. ? Many Journal Sentinel articles tend to cover the good in the Republican Party and emphasize the bad in the Democratic Party. However, the Journal Sentinel itself did non back a campaigner, which surprised many people. These three signifiers of media significantly influence people everyday, and rock their point of views to one campaigner or the other.

Following, I would wish to discourse why these different types of media cover a narrative. For illustration, I would wish to utilize the fact that George W. Bush was arrested for driving while intoxicated. MTV reported the intelligence without prejudice, but questioned the timing and beginnings of the information. However, in contrast, CNN shows and invitees tended to seek to fault the timing of the release of the narrative on the Gore run. They questioned why the information was coming out during the stoping yearss of the run and non earlier. Basically, they accused the Democrats of seeking to undermine the Republican Party. Mancow and his wireless show besides sided with this sentiment. Mancow questioned the cogency of the beginning, and tried to demo that Gore is a prevaricator and that the narrative was likely a prevarication. Mancow was really disquieted with the media that released the intelligence, and called them felon.

Another issue that stemmed from the George W. Bush DUI was the credibleness of the beginning and the significance of the information. MTV told their viewing audiences that the information was valid, and even confirmed it with the constabulary section that arrested Bush. The CNN shows and Mancow tried to state that the release of the information was a confederacy and didn? t focal point on whether the information was legitimate or non. However, the Journal Sentinel said that the information was legitimate, but that it was non important due to the fact that the incident happened over 20 old ages ago.

Besides, the information on George W. Bush harmed the morale of

Republicans or possible Republicans. As a consequence of this, MTV gave the Republicans a opportunity to give a statement about the issue. They covered the Republican point of view and account, that the incident happened in the past and shouldn? T affect electors, and tried to stay nonsubjective. CNN became defensive of Bush and tried to demo bad things about Gore, such as lying about statistics and bizarre narratives. Mancow besides became really defensive. Mancow called the media? evil broad media, ? that is seeking to destruct Bush? s opportunities of being elected. Mancow had many invitees come on to state bad things about Al Gore to seek to conceal the fact about Bush. The Journal Sentinel tried to stay nonsubjective and describe the facts about Bush. The Journal Sentinel wasn? T looking to ache Republicans or assist Democrats.

Next, the narratives may or may non be shown from a assortment of point of views. MTV was great at demoing both the Republican and Democratic point of views of the issues. In most, if non all sections on the election, equal clip was given to the two major parties. Once once more, CNN tended merely to demo the Republican point of view of the narrative. They tried to switch the limelight by stating bad things about Al Gore, and avoiding the subject of the Bush DUI. Mancow besides didn? T entertain the point of views of Democrats. During listener call-in sections, Mancow hung up on Democrats, but listened to what Republicans had to state. Mancow even went so far as to name a hearer a? Dummycrap, ? if the hearer endorsed Gore. However, one time once more, the Journal Sentinel remained about impersonal on the topic. Their articles did non discourse how atrocious the Republicans or Democrats were. Alternatively the Journal Sentinel reported the facts and tried to stay impersonal so the populace could do its ain determination.

Last, the gatekeepers frame the different point of views of each of these types of media. MTV is chiefly geared towards younger people concerned with? dad culture. ? MTV tried to cover the most interesting things about the election that would assist their evaluations with the adolescents and immature grownups in America. CNN is funded by large concern, which tends to be Republican. Therefore, the positions of CNN tend to demo the Republicans in a positive visible radiation and seek to dismiss the Democratic Party. Besides, Mancow and his manufacturers are purely anti-Democrat. They hate the Clinton Administration and think that Gore is an abomination. As a consequence, Mancow does everything he can to seek to do Gore expression bad and seek to switch electors over to the Republican side. Finally, the Journal Sentinel and its editors wanted to stay every bit impersonal as possible in this election. As a consequence, they didn? Ts take a side in the issue.

In decision, all these types of media had dockets. The Bush DUI apprehension helped to do these dockets clearer to the populace. MTV wanted to keep evaluations, and acquire immature people informed about the campaigners. CNN wanted people to vote Republican so they tried to dismiss the narrative whenever possible. Mancow? s docket is that he doesn? T want Gore in office and will make whatever it takes to maintain him out. Finally, the Journal Sentinel? s docket may hold been to maintain endorsers and involvement other readers. As a consequence they tried to appeal to the largest audience by staying impersonal on the subject and allowing people think for themselves. I think that people need to analyse things for themselves and non value the sentiment of others or Television shows every bit much as they do. Many people believe that all they see and hear is true, when in world the information is filtered into something that an executive wants the populace to hear. Peoples need to believe critically the following clip an issue like this is presented to them by the media.

310