Media Essay, Research Paper

Pro and con Television.

This essay is non divided in pro and con parts, I have merely written it as a whole essay, chiefly about pro & # 8217 ; s but you will be able to happen some con & # 8217 ; s. I was in uncertainty if I should hold did it the other manner, but I hope this is the right manner. Now at least you know the ground.

I must state I am wholly pro telecasting, it is a superb manner for us to absorbe assorted information. The gait of intelligence, films, series, or whatever we are shown is up to the broadcaster but anyway it is much quicker than to read a newspaper to i.e. watch the seven o & # 8217 ; clock intelligence, though a inquiry is likely to be raised here ; Do we retrieve a intelligence bulletin every bit good as if we had read a newspaper? I can non give a unequivocal reply to that, but I must state that for my interest I do. Anyway you can ever watch the intelligence more than one time, of class you can make the same with a newspaper, but that is one of the great things about telecasting ; it does non demand anything from the spectator, merely that he/she has one. You must of class be able to read to read a newspaper, so you must open it, put on your spectacless if necessary, turn the pages and read. Making that, reading, you must concentrate, otherwise you do non understand any of it. It is more easy with a telecasting ; you merely sit down force your remote, if you have one, and whatever you are whatching gets practicaly thrown out into your livingroom.

Radio is besides a good option, for intelligence and music, but so, to me, that is it. There were in the past wireless dramas, but the lone & # 8220 ; subsister & # 8221 ; is, every bit far as I know, the old drama by O.Wells non that there is anything incorrect with that, but today we want more action. Exciting images, and expensive particular effects, the people behind it all knows it, so they try of class to give us what we want, which is wining brightly, after my oppinion! Some do non like this development. They want the old radioplays back. They long for the clip when you went to the films, whenever we wanted to se a movie. But the lone one responsible for this development is us, chiefly the people in the 60 & # 8217 ; s and the 70 & # 8217 ; s. They instead wanted to watch telecasting than listen to radio shows, and as I wrote above, T

hey merely satisfies our, the viewers/listeners, demands. They do non care about tradition or how we messure our life qualities today, it is all buisness, merely money affairs. That is the most unsafe, if non vulgar, factor of our medias today. The few who tries to keep on to i.e. good news media is traveling down, which is a shame, but… . To take to illustrations, “Det Friday aktuelt” , and “Ekstra bladet” , merely attempt and compare their sale figures! Even though “Det Friday aktuelt” is a far better newspaper, I am certain that “Ekstra bladet” sells twice every bit many newspapers. That makes you wonder! ! !

What is coming towards us? What can we anticipate as the following information roar? It has already been predicted. The Internet! The following 21th century society has already been named as & # 8220 ; The information society & # 8221 ; . As more and more bargains a computing machine, it will shortly be every bit common as telecasting, what could we hold expected? But is it non unsafe? See how fast a missive or a book can be read by 1000s all over the universe. The latest illustration is Ritt Bjerreg? rds book, or diary if you like, non merely was it published by a newspaper, & # 8220 ; Politiken & # 8221 ; , it was besides & # 8220 ; launched & # 8221 ; on the cyberspace, everyone with acces to the cyberspace could read it ; even & # 8220 ; download*1 & # 8243 ; it, I would wish to cognize how many computing machines it is on right now, non precisely few I think. I unfeignedly hope that whoever was behind the launching of that book on the cyberspace, gets a serious sentence, because where will it stop if we accept this ilegal publication of anything, nil will be secret any longer, a chilling idea after my oppinion. Fortunatly this is the first illustration, every bit far as we know anyhow, of truly internet offense. There I mean it should hold terrible effects, we must non tollerate this sort of unsafe media before it is legal. To stop the capable cyberspace I will turn back to my old statement ; todays medias is all about money. About a month ago the proprietor of the biggest package company in the universe Bill Clarke, proprietor of & # 8220 ; Microsoft & # 8221 ; , declared that he was shaving to purchase the cyberspace. I do non believe, hope, it is possible because right cipher truly owns it. It is a large telephone meeting, like Telecoms 159 figure, merely much more complicated. But we will see in the hereafter!