Microsoft Monopoly Essay, Research Paper
Roll the dies and watch the chapeau bounciness from one infinite to another, as the participant assists the chapeau with the inevitable completion of it s ultimate ocean trip. The ocean trip of having all of the belongingss, financess, real-estate, and strategically seting all the other participants into bankruptcy to complete this challenge of going the victor, or monopolizer. Bill Gates of the Microsoft Corporation has played this game, and he has played it good. The inevitable authorities intercession, that our modified market economic system creates, merely like victims before the current Microsoft Corp. s monopoly, such as Standard Oil, or AT & A ; T both of which were proven to be a monopoly under the Anti-Trust Act, and action was to taken to rectify the state of affairs so the monopolistic construction of these companies would non go on for consumer benefit. In these two instances the pre-determined finding of facts were right from the beginning of the test. Both companies were true monopolies and unjust, to the consumer, tactics were being invoked in a system were competition was non a member of the dictionary. Microsoft, nevertheless, has non committed any criminal Acts of the Apostless against the consumer. If a consumer was non happy so why would the consumer travel back and purchase the latest versions of the Microsoft merchandise line. A company can non be a monopoly when there is competition, or worthy adequate competition. The assorted versions of the Windows operating system were created for easiness of us for the user, and minimising the sum of complicated undertakings so merely about anyone could utilize a computing machine. Since no other company could bring forth a worthy adequate merchandise to vie with Microsoft s merchandises in the personal computing machine market, Microsoft was proclaimed to be a monopoly merely because of this deficiency of competition. A company designed to help the consumer, doing his or her undertakings easier and at a just monetary value for the merchandise that they receive, and now merely because of the deficiency of worthy competition this great company must be lacerate apart from the interior seams and reorganized in some disconcerted mode.
The success of a company is all about market scheme. Gates was a God of market strategizing. Back in the yearss when their were no Windows runing systems Gates put out MS-DOS ( Microsoft Disk Operating System ) to do an easier environment for tackling all the treating power a computing machine had available. With good advertisement and a few trades with computing machine shapers MS-DOS was a large success selling 1000s of transcripts. From so on Microsoft was on its manner up the ladder and their was no halting this steam engine from chugging along at its fast gait of crushing the competition and bring forthing the money. To the little start-up company making package for the consumer, they ever have person to fear, Bill Gates is their enemy from the clip their company starts till the death of their company when they can non vie at all from so on ( Dickinson 106 ) .
Microsoft has entered many markets and in each has dominated in all its glorification turn outing Microsoft can non be stopped. The database market was owned by Borland Inc. s MS-DOS version of Paradox, a database plan for making databases, Gates so stepped in with his long anticipated version of Microsoft Access for Windows ( a cardinal term here is long anticipated significance consumers wanted this merchandise ) and shamed the competition, being Borland, one time their merchandise became the industry criterion and leader Gates could non be stopped. He so offered Access for a cheaper introductory monetary value and besides introduced a new version of Visual Fox Pro, another database plan of a late acquired company, that ran on Windows, and unlike Borland s Paradox which ran on DOS this merely meant they could non vie with the user friendly Windowss versions ( Dickinson 106 ) . This success was merely a merchandise of good selling schemes and timing. The same thing occurred with Lotus 1-2-3, a spreadsheet plan, was shortly rivaled by Microsoft Excel which was of class for Windows unlike 1-2-3 and it had a GUI ( Graphical User Interface ) which was much more superior to the DOS based 1-2-3 where everything was a character-based plan, where you type everything in, even the bids to run the plan that must to typed in to set-up and utilize the spreadsheets ( Morissey 210 ) . The same exact thing occurred in the word processing market when Microsoft beat WordPerfect with its Microsoft Word. A consumer would non desire something that was non easy to utilize. Of class, the consumer would buy Excel or Access for the easiness of usage factor and high quality that was either physically there or mentally there ( Goetz 103 ) . It truly does non count every bit long as the consumer is the consumer and buys the merchandises. Should Microsoft be punished for viing with these companies and advancing promotion in making criterions? Bill provided newer and far superior thoughts to add to these assorted markets by puting even higher criterions. Without Microsoft s intercession, the procedure of doing these merchandises better might hold taken everlastingly. In the terminal the state of affairs is better for the consumer, you would non anticipate a consumer to buy a plan that is non every bit good as another one, and it is proven that it is non every bit good. These are the things that made Microsoft a monopoly.
The Windows Operating system has been claimed one of the most user-friendly operating systems in the personal computing machine market, if you do non include Apple s operating system. The operating system market is what separated Microsoft from the little company they were to the large company that it has grown to go. Unlike a monopoly which raises monetary values and invention normally declines, Microsoft has created bigger and better thoughts with each new release of their operating system and their monetary values remain at the sensible monetary value, if you don t see the fact that there are no other runing systems like it to compare a monetary value to, yet the monetary value is still sensible for something that runs your full computing machine commanding its every operation and procedures. A consumer has a pick, even though there are non excessively many picks the pick still exists, UNIX or LINUX which are both two command-based runing systems like DOS but they are far superior and more powerful. Tonss of companies put out assorted versions of LINUX and UNIX ( which are fundamentally about the same type of operating system ) , so there is decidedly a scope of options in this sub-market of runing systems ( Michael-Hayes 83 ) . There is pick, but would a consumer prefer to purchase a plan that goes from Point A to Point B, Windows, or one that goes from Point C to Indicate A so to Point D to the completion at Point B? The reply to this inquiry would normally be no, because your mean consumer does non hold a unmarried man s grade in computing machine scientific discipline which is sometimes required to carry through a command of UNIX, sometimes merely to even put in it. Deciding factors in this market are besides based upon trust, does this consumer trust a little company that merely began that they might hold ne’er heard of or do they swear Big Bill with his Windows operating system ( OS ) ( Bournellis 6 ) . An Operating System is an built-in portion of every computing machine, and normally a necessity, unless the user wants to gaze into the inkiness of an empty proctor twenty-four hours in and twenty-four hours out. Operating Systems form all the computing machine processes to be processed expeditiously it is what makes your computing machine the computing machine. An old bible narrative speaks of a adult male that built his house on sand and a adult male that built his house on a stone, even though Microsoft built its operating system on sand, it is really epicurean sand that does non gnaw excessively fast compared to
the sturdy jagged stone that takes a good trade of work to make the pinnacle, the completion, of a undertaking that UNIX sits on. It is like taking a nice looking, on the outside, FORD auto to purchasing a boxlike GMC full-sized cab truck. The merchandise of pick, of class, would be the epicurean house on the sand, Windows OS, because even though you have a few interruption downs, sometimes a batch of dislocations, dislocations being instabilities in the OS, like what the FORD auto might supply person might still bask driving about in something that looks nicer. With all of these variables that go into doing Windows OS the success that it is the authorities still found Microsoft to be a monopoly, even with just pricing, and invention with deficiency of competition they still are a monopoly.
In order for Microsoft to do it in the hereafter they have to maintain making things, and coming up with new inventions and thoughts, if non so that would be their death. Bill Gates is cognizant of this and he is mundane looking for new thoughts that will assist hike his company into the following millenary on a base. When Gates eventually realized the hereafter is the Internet ; with 1000000s and 1000000s of users a twenty-four hours and an addition in users by twenty-four hours as good, how could this non be the hereafter he had to take action. One of Microsoft s large conflicts was with the Netscape Navigator in the browser wars between Netscape and Internet Explorer, Microsoft s web browser. A web browser is used to expose information that is put into a natural format that is non really easy to read until it is inputted into the web browser and so outputted to a nice clear web page. The web browser is what makes the Internet the Internet. It is like what an Os is to a computing machine as a web browser is to the Internet. For Microsoft to be the leader in the browser market every bit good as the OS market would decidedly guarantee their hereafter, at least it did until the determination that Microsoft was a monopoly. Since Gates had adequate operating expense to cover the assets of offering something like his web browser for free to increase popularity of his merchandise, Internet Explorer ( IE ) , over Netscape s. Netscape could non vie with these utmost concern tactics because they did non hold excessively many other ways to bring forth adequate operating expense to cover the losingss. Although, Bill took a batch longer to go the top Canis familiaris of the browser market compared to the clip it took in other markets, he still managed a triumph over Netscape. Over clip more and more people adopted IE over Netscape because of assorted grounds each user finds for him or herself ( Bell 7 ) . Thingss that might rock a users determination could be quicker lading times, more characteristics for more advanced web browse, more embedded circuit boards, a circuit board is a thing that adds a characteristic that can tackle some new engineering or something of that kind. The grounds for why person might take IE over Netscape is a really short list or a long list depending upon the individual. The popularity of IE over Netscape is fringy, at least, but as clip goes on Netscape will of class lose more and more support until eventually Microsoft is on top of yet another market ( Moschella 117 ) . They are non at the top because of greed and monopolistic grounds, but they are at the top because of their invention, low, fundamentally non-existent, monetary values, and assorted methods of deploying the browser to the consumer.
The instance that was late against Microsoft, the Anti-trust instance, found them guilty of being in misdemeanor of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. The Sherman Act was designed to keep economic autonomy, and to extinguish restraints on trade and competition, ( www.law.cornell.edu ) . In this instance Gates company was proven to hold committed a few well backed up things that might impute to a monopoly, but still it does non intend Microsoft is a monopoly particularly since they do non utilize manipulative monopolistic tactics. It was proven that Windows 98 tallies slower with IE bundled with the Windows 98 OS, but even if it was non bundled the consumer would still obtain a transcript of IE if that is what he preferred to utilize as his browser. It was besides said that it posed possible security hazards, what a individual must understand is that the Internet is a large security hazard all by itself. If you are of import plenty of a individual that person is out to acquire you and assail you electronically, so they will. They will make whatever stairss they can to accomplish their end, despite the fact that person might hold IE or Netscape or whatever that individual is utilizing on the Internet they will acquire them, browser or non ( Penfield 60 ) . The tribunals felt they had significant grounds, and they likely were right in naming Microsoft a monopoly under written fortunes. On unwritten footings and if you looked beyond the documents and the facts, people would see Microsoft was a company seeking to do things better, of class, doing a net income for themselves, but overall bettering things for the consumer with its easiness of usage, or more power and faster operation Microsoft was their to do that go on, and if they would non hold stepped in the alterations might hold ne’er been made.
The fact of Microsoft being a monopoly all comes down to this, does a consumer purchase the merchandise still? Does the consumer want the merchandise? Consumers demand the merchandise and acquire disquieted when these merchandises are late. If Gates had created a monopoly the consumer would non desire to acquire the merchandise so much, in fact, the consumer would non even upgrade his package to a ulterior version because he was morally against the full thought of Microsoft, and did non desire to back up the company. This is non the instance so many people want these merchandises that they outweigh the figure that do non desire the merchandises by far. Bill Gates might be a difficult working concern adult male with capitalist tactics, and possibly his motives are self involved. These facts do non do Bill s company a monopoly, it makes him a austere unpleasant man of affairs, but it does non do his company a monopoly. Supplying a service that betters, and makes life easier at a sensible monetary value does non be up to a monopoly, but to a company that wants to do money, knows how to do money, and is seting into drama the proper concern tactics to bring forth the money in order for their company to be successful in the technologically fueled old ages in front.
Plants Cited
Bell, Allison. No Hostages in Browser War. National Underwriter Life & A ; Health-
Bournellis, Cynthia. Microsoft Presence Sends Wake-Up Call. Electronic News
( 1991 ) , Oct 14, 1996 v42 n2138 p6.
Buran, Bradley. Microsoft & # 8217 ; s Monopoly Game: Letterss to the Editor. The
Washington Post, Washington Nov 13, 1999
Cornell Law II. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.law.cornell.edu/topics/antitrust.html.
Dickinson, John. The Secrets to Microsoft s Monopoly. Personal computer Computing, May 1993
v6 n5 p106.
Goetz, A. Martin. The Government has to Stop Microsoft Now. Computerworld,
June 19, 1995 v29 n25 p107.
Michael-Hayes, Garett. Windows 2000 directory additions land on NetWare, Unix.
Computerworld, Dec 14, 1998 p83 ( 1 ) .
Morrissey, Jane. The Microsoft Monopoly: Less Chaos More Concern. Personal computer Week,
Nov 14, 1994 v11 n45 p210.
Moschella, David. Few Escapes for Netscape. Computerworld, Jan 19, 1998 v32
n3 p117 ( 1 ) .
Michael-Hayes, Garett. Windows 2000 directory additions land on NetWare, Unix.
Computerworld, Dec 14, 1998 p83 ( 1 ) .
Penfield, T. Jackon. Microsoft Enjoys Monopoly Power. Time, Nov 15, 1999
v154 i20 p60.
