& # 8217 ; s Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper

& # 8220 ; Utilitarianism & # 8221 ; is the ethical philosophy, which basically states that which is good is that which brings about the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill believed that the determinations we make should ever profit the most people every bit much as possible regardless of the effects to the minority or even yourself. He would state all that affairs in the determination of right versus incorrect is the sum of felicity produced by the effects. In the determinations we make Mill would state that we need to weigh the results and do our determination based on that result that benefits the bulk. For Mill, pleasance is the lone desirable effect of our determinations or actions. The Judeo-christian moral principle embraced by Augustine topographic points inquiries of right and incorrect under the authorization of a Godhead Godhead & # 8211 ; God. The Judeo-christian moral principle can be summed up in one word & # 8211 ; Love. In Matthew 22:40 Jesus says: & # 8220 ; Love the Lord your God with all your bosom and with all your psyche and with all your head. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the 2nd is like it: Love you neighbor as yourself. & # 8221 ;

Utilitarian desire the greatest felicity as an terminal, their committedness is to pleasure. For Mills, felicity is the coveted terminal regardless of the agencies. In the procedure of organizing a determination the Utilitarian must consciously weigh results for the greatest felicity.

John Stuart Mill obviously laid out what he believes that the footing for ethical decision-making. First, the chase of pleasance is straight related to happiness. This thought can be easy accepted. It is natural for a individual to concentrate his ends on things that will convey him pleasance. It would be absurd if person & # 8217 ; s end in life were to be hapless and hungering. This being said, it does non intend that people are merely happy due wealth

but that no one’s ends are focused on poorness. Although there are many issues that can be agreeable with Mill, there are jobs that exist with his theory of utilitarianism. First, Mill says that all ethical determinations should be based on pleasance. This statement becomes questionable when Mill states that pleasance is the exclusive demand for felicity. Pain indirectly effects felicity. Pain is an indirect factor because is non the object of one’s felicity, but is an obstruction which 1 must get the better of to derive it. If one is to avoid all hurting in his or her life, so how will that individual genuinely cognize what true pleasance feels like? True pleasance comes merely after sing hurting. If a individual ever wins a race, does he or she feel true pleasance each clip they win or does it turn into a feeling that they come to anticipate? Pain can finally do pleasance, and in some instances the presence of hurting will increase the feeling of felicity.

Mill justifies the chase of pleasance by stating & # 8220 ; actions are right in proportion as they tend to advance felicity ; wrong as they tend to bring forth the contrary of happiness. & # 8221 ; This statement is non universally true. Peoples have different positions, what is pleasance for one could be pain for another. Who is right and is incorrect? A job evolves because there is no set definition refering to what is enjoyable hence right and painful hence incorrect.

If one performs a moral action, but has immoral purposes, that individual should non be considered ethically right. To be genuinely right and happy, one must non merely act but besides think right. Mill suggests that pleasance should steer our decision-making. While the statement is true, it is non to the full correct. If a individual will cover with hurting that come from difficult work, dedication, and doggedness, so the benefits will be that much sweeter.