Mitigation Essay, Research Paper
Extenuation steps for all culturally important locations found during an archeological study along the thirty-mile long proposed gas grapevine undertaking in parts of Cleveland and McClain Counties in cardinal Oklahoma should see the grade of the impact, such as, no inauspicious affect, an inauspicious consequence, or no consequence. Other consideration, when sing extenuation techniques is how important is the impact. Early presentment of the State historic saving officers is besides of import when finding historical site information and extenuation considerations.
1.Mitigation programs for location A ( 5 stat mis east of the westernmost point of the grapevine ) , which is already included in the National Register of Historic Places ( NRHP ) would dwell of the followers ; jump paths that would avoid the NRHP site wholly, down scaling the proposed undertaking size, or perchance abandoning the grapevine undertaking wholly. All these proposed extenuation techniques could be used which would save the NRHP site any inauspicious effects. If the grapevine undertaking must go on along the proposed path, alternate extenuation options could be used. Possibly mending, rehabilitating or even reconstructing the site where any harm has occurred during the building stage of the grapevine. If these extenuation would non be acceptable, so resettlement of the site and the salvage of all sites & # 8217 ; stuff if the site location had to be destroyed during building.
2.Location B and C ( 8 stat mis and 9 stat mis, severally, E of the westernmost point of the grapevine ) , were found eligible for NRHP protection. Mitigation measures at both location B and C would be the same as location A, since belongingss eligible for inclusions are covered under subdivision 106 of The National Historic Preservation Act which is the same as belongingss already listed in the NRHP.
3.At location D
( 14 stat mis east of the westernmost point of the grapevine ) , an old edifice used as a farm house by early colonist ( about 100 old ages ago ) in Cleveland county was found non eligible for the NRHP. Even thought the farmhouse was non eligible for the NRHP this does non needfully intend that the farmhouse does non hold historical value to the Locals. Consideration of Local concerns should be addressed when sing devastation of the farmhouse and possible extenuation steps. Other considerations include possible future eligibility to the NRHP, since the farmhouse is 100 old ages old. Possible extenuation step could include resettlement of the farmhouse or event an surrogate path for the grapevine. Finally it may be necessary to pulverize the farmhouse in the involvement of the gas grapevine undertaking.
4.At location E ( 23 stat mis east of the westernmost point of the grapevine ) several grave sites were found: which are thought to be a portion of a larger Indian entombment land. This location and all associated points would be protected by The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990. Mitigation recommendation for this site would be non to upset the Gravess by rerouting the grapevine, or call offing the grapevine undertaking. Break of the Indian entombment land as a extenuation option would be improbable.
Prearranged programs should be made for any extra historic belongingss found during the building stage of the thirty-mile long grapevine. The programs should be included in any certification during the appraisal and audience stairss of the Section 106 procedure. It may be necessary to develop understandings or Memoranda of Understanding with the province and local archeological bureaus merely in instance a site is discovered during the building stage. Care should be taken non to unwrap any information to the populace until the historical site is protected from stealers and from people that could damage the site.
