Are drug companies that test experimental drugs in foreign states moving ethically? In my sentiment. a batch of people in foreign states are uneducated and hence. may non to the full understand the hazards. complications and side effects of these experimental drugs. If they do non hold the agencies to adequately research the drug prior to proving it. they may stop up making so without to the full understanding what possible side effects are involved. I am non certain how good companies educate these foreign states and or people involved in the instance survey. If these people are non educated decently than it is unethical for them to prove experimental drugs on them. Is American industry at excessively much hazard of cases to stay competitory? Should companies seeking to develop drugs be given unsusceptibility from cases? The American industry is at hazard for cases. I believe people sue now yearss for about anything. However. it is non excessively much of a hazard to stay competitory.

America is one of the richest states in the universe. I feel China is our biggest competition. We must go on to progress our engineering. heighten our merchandises and services and look for new thoughts and innovations in order to stay competitory. There will ever be a hazard of cases but I do non experience is would halt us from being competitory. Companies seeking to develop drugs should non be given unsusceptibility from cases. I know that by developing and contriving new drugs. companies are seeking to stay competitory and happen remedies or medical specialties to assist people. However. some of the side effects that are related to these drugs are awful and can do lasting harm. I besides understand that most side effects are disclosed to people who take these new drugs nevertheless ; non all side effects are known with these new drugs and some of them can take to decease. It may non be the company’s purpose to do decease or some other serious lack but it happens and when it does. the person should hold to compensate to action for medical related costs and hurting and agony. Is it ethical for companies to worsen to sell a utile drug because they can do more money selling drugs that are more widely needed? Is it ethical for companies to worsen to sell a utile drug in a foreign state because they can do more money marketing the drug elsewhere? I personally feel that it is neither ethical nor unethical for a company to worsen to sell a utile drug merely because they can do more money selling drugs that are more widely needed.

It truly is up to the company what drugs they want to sell nevertheless ; if a drug is available that will assist people and or remedy disease. it should be made available and companies should sell it. From a concern base point I can understand why they would desire to market merely drugs that are more widely needed as it will do them more money nevertheless ; by offering or selling drugs that are utile. they will finally derive more acknowledgment and that could take to a competitory advantage. As for whether or non it is ethical for companies to worsen selling a utile drug in a foreign state because they can do more money marketing the drug elsewhere. I am once more neither in understanding or dissension on this 1. It is a company’s chose where and to whom they want to sell drugs to. However. in hapless states. people can non easy afford anything. Companies would hold to cut down their monetary value significantly even by selling in majority. If they sell to China or other states that can afford the drugs. I am certain they would make so but they besides risk losing money.

Make companies hold an ethical duty to do drugs available in hapless states at small or no cost? I personally feel that companies do non hold an ethical duty to do drugs available in hapless states at small or no cost. I surely can understand that people in other states have it really hard. A batch of people have small or no money and can hardly afford to feed their household and or kids allow entirely afford wellness attention and or drugs. However. by doing drugs available at small to no cost. people will be able to sell it and utilize it illicitly making an even bigger job. Peoples will smuggle it into the United States as they do now with street drugs. It is unfortunate that people with good purposes who will utilize the drugs and or medicine for what it is prescribe for have to endure because of those people whose purposes are non so good. Those free and or lost cost drugs will be another manner for felons to do money. I do non believe it is a good thought nor do I experience that companies have any type of moral or ethical duty to make this.