Money, Money Essay, Research Paper

Farnaz Falsafi

English 210

12/7/1999

Money, Money, Money, Money

Some people say that money is the root of all evil, but even so, it is realized that one can non last with out it. Money is a necessity, and most everyone can hold to the fact that fiscal security can do one? s life easier. The implicit in subject of money plays a cardinal function in Henrik Ibsen? s play A Doll House. The economic subject shapes the secret plan of the drama, affects each character? s behaviour, and decides the characters? state of affairss.

First, in the secret plan, reader can rapidly see that it is built on economic sciences. One gets this right off when it is revealed that Helmer, Nora? s hubby, has merely become the new director of a bank. Not merely does his new place bring in fiscal security, but besides the bank itself is a symbol of money or economic system. As the narrative progresses, the reader easy discovers the fiscal insecurity that the household had suffered in the yesteryear. Because of the difficult times, Helmer was forced to happen excess work and his many occupations caused him to go ill. It is based on this old economic insecurity that Ibsen develops the secret plan. To salvage Helmer? s life, Nora is forced to borrow money for a trip that he must take from an old familiarity, Krogstad. The narrative revolves around the fact that Nora has kept her borrowing money from Krogstad and easy paying off her debt monthly an unbelievable secret from Helmer. Nora? s secretiveness creates an air of tenseness in the drama. ? But that? s the point: he mustn? T know! My Lord, can? t you understand? He mustn? t of all time cognize? ? ( Meyer, 1572 ) . In the terminal, economic affairs besides add to the secret plan. Driven for the demand for fiscal stableness, Nora decides to go forth her hubby and her household so that she may do a life on her ain. She realizes that she has been dependent on Helmer for everything that she has needed and wants one time and for all to be free of the load of economic insecurity. ? I have to seek to educate myself. You can? t aid me with that. I? ve got to make it entirely. And that? s why I? m go forthing you now? ( 1609 ) . Another point in the drama where money plays a cardinal function in the secret plan is when Nora? s friend Kristine shows up at her house with non a penny to her name. Kristine asks Helmer for a place at the bank, which he lief gives her. But, Helmer does so by firing Krogstad. ? I? m besides cognizant now whom I can thank for being turned out? Krogstad says angrily ( 1578 ) . Money evidently plays an of import map in the secret plan of the drama.

Aside from the secret plan, the characters? behaviours and ways of thought are strongly influenced by economic state of affairss. First, Nora? s behaviour can be compared to that of a stereotyped homemaker. Because Nora lacks money, she is wholly dependent upon her hubby for support. Anything she wishes to purchase she must first acquire money from Helmer, and in a manner, besides acquire permission. ? You could give me money, Torvald. No more than you think you can save ; so one of these yearss I? ll purchase something with it? ( 1566 ) . Nora besides equates personal freedom with how affluent she is. Since she does non work and does non do any money, she does non believe that she is? free? and allows Helmer to command her. Nora? s psychological attitude is besides affected by money. The reader can observe how Nora? s temper alterations in relation to how much money she has. When Nora has money, it is apparent that she is enraptured and thought of how to pass it. When she is missing money, her character becomes down and disquieted. ? Oh, Kristine, I feel so light and happy! Won? t it be lovely t

Os have tonss of money and non a attention in the universe? ? ( 1569 ) . In Helmer? s instance, he excessively is easy manipulated with money. The reader can see that Helmer acts more strongly when he has more money. Helmer believes he is more powerful and is more of import than others because he possesses more wealth. In this manner, the fact that Helmer has money affects his relationship with his married woman. Helmer treats Nora as if she were a kid, person without cognition or capableness to make anything for herself. ? Whatever comes, you? ll see ; when it truly counts I have strength and bravery plenty as a adult male o take on the whole weight myself? There, there, there? non these frightened dove? s eyes? ( 1588 ) . Another economic facet that forms Helmer? s character is that he besides does non believe in borrowing money. He thinks borrowing puts a individual in a disadvantageous place and he refuses to of all time travel into debt. His feelings are apparent when he tells Nora, ? No debts! Never borrow! Something of freedom? s lost? and something of beauty excessively? from a place that? s founded on adoption and debt? ( 1565 ) . Clearly, wealth and wealths influence people? s behaviour and ways of thought.

Finally, throughout the drama, the acquisition of wealth plays a map in the character? s state of affairss. In Nora? s instance, the fact that she had borrowed money, and done so illicitly with a bad signature, puts her in the grave state of affairs where she can be blackmailed by Krogstad. ? Do what you want now. But I? m stating you this: if I get shoved down a 2nd clip, you? re traveling to maintain me company? ( 1580 ) . Because Nora had to borrow financess, she is now under the control of an unrespectable adult male and lives in fright that he will uncover her secret. Krogstad and Anne-Marie? s state of affairss are besides likewise shaped by pecuniary demands. In Krogstad? s fortunes, his deficiency of money forced him to look toward dishonest agencies of going financially unafraid. As a consequence, he has created for himself a awfully hapless repute. Krogstad? s deficiency of money besides meant that he could non back up his kids as he would wish to. Krogstad urgently needed to maintain his place at the bank so that he could better his position and gain money at the same clip. ? I? ll have to win back every bit much regard as possible here in town. That occupation in the bank was like the first round in my ladder? ( 1578 ) . Quite likewise, Anna-Marie had besides had fiscal jobs. So much that she could non take attention of her kids either. This caused her to give up her kids in order to do money by going the household? s nurse. When Nora asked how she could give up her kids, Anne-Marie answers, ? When I could acquire such a good topographic point? A miss who? s hapless and who? s gotten in problem is glad plenty for that? ( 1584 ) . Another character? s state of affairs shaped by deficiency of wealths was Kristine? s. Kristine had been hapless and married for money, non for love. Acerate leaf to state, her matrimony fell apart and she was left with nil. Her state of affairs led her to come to Nora for aid. ? If merely I could acquire a steady occupation, some office work & # 8211 ; ? ( 1570 ) . All of these characters? state of affairss were based on fiscal insecurity and demand.

In decision, the characters of A Doll House, and the drama itself, are greatly affected by money. Monetary conditions influence the secret plan of the drama, the characters? manners and behavior, every bit good as form the state of affairss that the characters are in. Economic conditions is the cardinal subject of the drama and most facets of the drama revolve around it. Ibsen? s drama reflects the importance of money in people? s mundane lives, and demonstrates what can go on if one? s focal point relies wholly on wealth.